Skip to main content

Firm Founders and Novelty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 575 Accesses

Part of the book series: Innovation und Entrepreneurship ((INNOV))

Abstract

Founders are critical to the performance of new ventures. However, recent research has started a debate on the continuing role of founders in maturing ventures. At some point, founders who stay in control of a company’s management may become a hindrance to value creation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, R. B., Almeida, H., & Ferreira, D. 2005. Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance. Review of Financial Studies, 18(4): 1403–1432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aime, F., Humphrey, S., DeRue, D. S., & Paul, J. B. 2014. The riddle of heterarchy: Power transitions in cross-functional teams. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2): 327–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. 2001. The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6): 755–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmus, A., & Haeussler, C. 2016. Bridging the gap from inventions to innovations: Increasing success rates in clinical trials. Working Paper, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åstebro, T., & Thompson, P. 2011. Entrepreneurs, jacks of all trades or hobos? Research Policy, 40(5): 637–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audia, P. G., & Goncalo, J. A. 2007. Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry. Management Science, 53(1): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S., Sahaym, A., Howard, M. D., & Boeker, W. 2015. Parent inheritance, founder expertise, and venture strategy: Determinants of new venture knowledge impact. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(2): 322–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, C. M., & Burton, M. D. 2008. Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organization Science, 19(1): 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. 2004. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science, 15(6): 633–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunderson, J. S. 2003a. Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(4): 557–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunderson, J. S. 2003b. Team member functional background and involvement in management teams: Direct effets and the moderating role of power centralization. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4): 458–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunderson, J. S., & Reagans, R. E. 2011. Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organization Science, 22(5): 1182–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buyl, T., Boone, C., Hendriks, W., & Matthyssens, P. 2011. Top management team functional diversity and firm performance: The moderating role of CEO characteristics. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1): 151–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. 1982. The entrepreneur. Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, A. K. 2009. Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2): 185–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H.-S., & Thompson, L. 2005. Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 98(2): 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. 2005. Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research Policy, 34(6): 795–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conti, R., Gambardella, A., & Mariani, M. 2014. Learning to be edison: Inventors, organizations, and breakthrough inventions. Organization Science, 25(3): 833–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dencker, J. C., & Gruber, M. 2015. The effects of opportunities and founder experience on new firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 36(7): 1035–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. 2002. The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organization Science, 13(2): 128–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fern, M. J., Cardinal, L. B., & O’Neill, H. M. 2012. The genesis of strategy in new ventures: escaping the constraints of founder and team knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 33(4): 427–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S. 1992. Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3): 505–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, L. 2001. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47(1): 117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. J. 1993. Theories of the firm: Contractual and competence perspectives. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 3(2): 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. 2012. Organizing entrepreneurial judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. 2015. Introduction to a forum on the judgment-based approach to entrepreneurship. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(03): 585–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. K., Gino, F., & Staats, B. R. 2012. Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: Transforming resources into performance. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4): 998–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A. 2016. Knowledge-intensive work and the (re)emergence of democratic governance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(2): 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, H., Jungmittag, A., Schmoch, U., & Legler, H. 2000. Hochtechnologie 2000: Neudefinition der Hochtechnologie für die Berichterstattung zur technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands [High-tech industries 2000: New definition of high-tech industries for the reports on the technological performance of Germany], Report for the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research. Karlsruhe/Hannover, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeussler, C., Hennicke, M., & Mueller, E. 2016. Founder inventors and their investors: Implications for firm survival and growth. Working Paper, 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, D. H., & Lim, K. 2014. Knowledge brokering and organizational innovation: Founder imprinting effects. Organization Science, 25(4): 1134–1153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. F. 2009. The burden of knowledge and the ‘death of the renaissance man’: Is innovation getting harder? Review of Economic Studies, 76(1): 283–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaish, S., & Gilad, B. 1991. Characteristics of opportunities search of entrepreneurs versus executives: Sources, interests, general alertness. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(1): 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S., & Vakili, K. 2015. The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10): 1435–1457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keijl, S., Gilsing, V. A., Knoben, J., & Duysters, G. 2016. The two faces of inventions: The relationship between recombination and impact in pharmaceutical biotechnology. Research Policy, 45(5): 1061–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. 1979. Perception, opportunity, and profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. 1921. Risk, uncertainty and profit (Reprints of Economic Classics). New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kor, Y. Y. 2003. Experience-based top management team competence and sustained growth. Organization Science, 14(6): 707–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kor, Y. Y., Mahoney, J. T., & Michael, S. C. 2007. Resources, capabilities and entrepreneurial perceptions. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7): 1187–1212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E. P. 2005. Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(4): 649–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. M., Hwang, B.-H., & Chen, H. 2017. Are founder CEOs more overconfident than professional CEOs? Evidence from S&P 1500 companies. Strategic Management Journal, 38: 751–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, K. 2003. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4): 587–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, K. 2004. Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50(11): 1519–1533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlepage, G., Robison, W., & Reddington, K. 1997. Effects of task experience and group experience on group performance, member ability, and recognition of expertise. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2): 133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, K., Li, J., Hesterly, W., & Cannella, A. 2012. Top management team tenure and technological inventions at post-IPO biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Research, 65(9): 1349–1356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. 1979. Biased assimilation and attitude polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11): 2098–2109.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. 2010. The ambiguities of experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. 2006. Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1): 132–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melero, E., & Palomeras, N. 2015. The renaissance man is not dead! The role of generalists in teams of inventors. Research Policy, 44(1): 154–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, F. J., Bartel, C. A., & Kurtzberg, T. R. 2003. Diversity and creativity in work groups. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity. Innovation through collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. 2003. The persistence of founder influence: Management, ownership, and performance effects at initial public offering. Strategic Management Journal, 24(8): 707–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerlinger, E., & Berger, G. 1995. Technologieorientierte Industrien und Unternehmen: Alternative Definitionen [Technology-oriented industries and companies: Alternative definitions]. ZEW Discussion Paper, No. 95–20, Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. 1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2): 175–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocasio, W. 2011. Attention to attention. Organization Science, 22(5): 1286–1296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomeras, N., & Wehrheim, D. 2016. The strategic allocation of inventors to R&D collaborations. UC3M Working Paper Series, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2754691.

  • Park, H. D., & Tzabbar, D. 2016. Venture capital, CEOs’ sources of power, and innovation novelty at different life stages of a new venture. Organization Science, 27(2): 336–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reagans, R., Argote, L., & Brooks, D. 2005. Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Science, 51(6): 869–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D. 2001. Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2): 243–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmoch, U. 2008. Concept of a technology classification for country comparisons. Final report to the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4): 448–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J., & Fleming, L. 2010. Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Science, 56(1): 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stasser, G., & Titus, W. 1985. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6): 1467–1478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, W. H., & Roth, P. L. 2001. Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1): 145–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J., & Yogo, M. 2005. Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In D. W. K. Andrews, J. H. Stock, & T. J. Rothenberg (Eds.), Identification and inference for econometric models. Essays in honor of Thomas J. Rothenberg. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stucki, T. 2016. How the founders’ general and specific human capital drives export activities of start-ups. Research Policy, 45(5): 1014–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A., & Greve, H. R. 2006. Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 723–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valliere, D. 2013. Towards a schematic theory of entrepreneurial alertness. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3): 430–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vella, F., & Verbeek, M. 1999. Estimating and interpreting models with endogenous treatment effects. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 17(4): 473–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Hicks, D. 2015. Scientific teams: Self-assembly, fluidness, and interdependence. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1): 197–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, N. 2017. The throne vs. the kingdom. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2): 255–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M. 1987. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior: 185–208. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenbaum, G. M. 1998. Information sampling in decision-making groups. Small Group Research, 29(1): 57–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenbaum, G. M. 2000. The bias toward discussing shared information. Communication Research, 27(3): 379–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827): 1036–1039.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Figge .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Figge, P. (2018). Firm Founders and Novelty. In: Collective Knowledge. Innovation und Entrepreneurship. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22180-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics