Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Drogenpolitik und ihre (nicht-intendierten) Effekte

Die Praxis der globalen Prohibition und des „War on Drugs“

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Drogen in sozial- und kulturwissenschaftlicher Perspektive

Zusammenfassung

Seit 1961 existiert die moderne Drogenprohibition, seit 1971 ein Krieg gegen die Drogen. Der Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die Entstehung der globalen Drogenprohibition und stellt beispielhaft verschiedene Praktiken der Prohibition vor. Er diskutiert im Wesentlichen anhand der Figur des Drogenabhängigen vor allem die nicht-intendierten Effekte der modernen Prohibitionspraxis und des Krieges gegen die Drogen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Andreas P., E. Nadelmann. 2006. Policing the Globe. Criminalization and Crime Control in International Relations. Oxford et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreas P., E. Nadelman.(200). The Internationalization of Crime Control. In Crime and the global political economy, hrsg. v. R. H. Friman, 21-33., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartilow, H. A. 2014. Drug Wars Collateral Damage: US Counternarcotic Aid and Human Rights in the Americas. Latin American Research Review 49: 24–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, P. 2008. Drugs and Crime. Cullompton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, P. 2010. Legalising Drugs: Debates and Dilemmas. Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewley-Taylor, D. R. 1999. The United States and international drug control, 1909-1997. London, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewley-Taylor, D. R. 2003. Challenging the UN drug control conventions: problems and possibilities. The International Journal of Drug Policy 14: 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewley-Taylor, D. R. 2012. International Drug Control: Consensus Fractured. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewley-Taylor, D., M. Jelsma. 2012. Regime change: Re-visiting the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. The International journal on drug policy 23: 72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekhout van Solinge, T. 2004. Dealing with Drugs in Europe. An Investigation of European Drug Control Experiences: France, the Netherlands and Sweden. The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouley, E. 2001. The Drug War in Latin America: Ten Years in a Quagmire. In Drug War, American Style: The Internationalization of Failed Policy and its Alternatives, hrsg. v. J. Gerber, E. L. Jensen, 169–196. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briesen, D. 2005. Drogenkonsum und Drogenpolitik in Deutschland und den USA. Ein historischer Vergleich. Frankfurt/Main, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruun, K., P. Lynn, I. Rexed. 1975. The Gentlemen’s Club: International Control of Drugs and Alcohol. Chicago, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, E. 2012. Drugs as an existential threat: An analysis of the international securitization of drugs. International Journal of Drug Policy 23: 407–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutrona, SAC. 2017. Challenging the U.S.-Led War on Drugs: Argentina in Comparative Perspective. London et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ridder, M. 2000. Heroin: vom Arzneimittel zur Droge. Frankfurt/Main, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. 1995. The Rhetoric of Drugs. In Ders., Points…: Interviews, 1974-1994, 228–254. Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, L. 2000. Reconsidering Drugs. Mapping Victorian and Modern Drug Discourses. Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elvins, M. 2003. Anti-Drug Policies of the European Union. Transnational Decision-Making and the Politics of Expertise. Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazey, C. S. J. 2003. The Commission on Narcotic Drugs and the United Nations International Control Programme: politics, policies and prospect for change. International Journal of Drug Policy 14: 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, S., D. Moore. 2011. Introduction. Constructing drugs and addiction. In The Drug Effect. Health, crime and society, hrsg. v. S. Fraser, D. Moore, 1–16. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1991. The War We are Loosing. In Searching for Alternatives: Drug-Control Policy in the United States, hrsg. v. M. B. Krauss, E. P. Lazear, 53–67. Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, J. 2008. Fighting Terrorism and Drugs. Europe and International Police Cooperation. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesendorf, C. 2007. US Foreign Policy and the War on Drugs: Displacing the Cocaine and Heroin Industry. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friman, R. H. 1996. NarcoDiplomacy: Exporting the US War on Drugs. Ithaca (NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, J., E. L. Jensen. (Hrsg.). 2001. Drug War, American Style: The Internationalization of Failed Policy and its Alternatives. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, K. 2008. Chasing Dragons. Security, Identity, and Illicit Drugs in Canada. Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, J. R. 1981. The Culture of Public Problems. Drinking, Driving and the Symbolic Order.Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, R. 2008. Drugs and Crime. Theories and Practices. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschinger, E. 2011. Constructing Global Enemies. Hegemony and Identity in International Discourses on Terrorism and Drug Prohibition. Abingdon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschinger, E. 2012. ‘Hell Is the Other’: Conceptualising Hegemony and Identity through Discourse Theory. Millennium – Journal of International Studies 41: 65–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschinger, E. 2015a. The drug dispositif: Ambivalent materiality and the addiction of the global drug prohibition regime. Security Dialogue 46: 183–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschinger, E. 2015b. Gerechte Praxis statt universellem Standard: Eine alternative Perspektive auf Gerechtigkeit am Beispiel des globalen Drogendiskurses. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 56: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschinger, E., M. Jachtenfuchs, C. Kraft-Kasack. 2011. Scratching the heart of the artichoke? How international institutions and the European Union constrain the state monopoly of force. European Political Science Review 3: 445–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, A. 2012. Medicine and the psy disciplines. In Research Methods in Critical Security Studies, hrsg. v. M. B. Salter, C. E. Mutlu, 129–132. Abingdon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelsma, M. 2003. Drugs in the UN system: the unwritten history of the 1998 United Nations General Assembly Special Session on drugs. International Journal of Drug Policy 14: 181–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, H. G. 2003. Global drug prohibition: its uses and crises. International Journal of Drug Policy 14: 145–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnemann, T. 2013. Governing through meth: Local politics, drug control and the drift toward securitization. Crime, Media, Culture 9: 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCoun, R., K. Model, H. Philipps-Shockley, P. Reuter. 1995. Comparing Drug Policies in North America and Western Europe. In Policies and Strategies to Combat Drugs in Europe, hrsg. v. G. Estievenart, 197–220. Florence.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCoun, R., P. Reuter. 2002. Preface. The Varieties of Drug Control at the Dawn of the Twenty- First Century. The Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science 582: 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, W. B. 2000. Drug Diplomacy in the Twentieth Century. An International History. London, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montigny, E.-A. (Hrsg.). 2011. The Real Dope. Social, Legal, and Historical Perspectives on the Regulation of Drugs in Canada. Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. 2007. Criminal Artefacts. Governing Drugs and Users. Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musto, D. 1973. The American Disease. Origins of Narcotics Control. New Haven, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelmann, E. A. 1990. Global prohibition regimes: the evolution of norms in international society. International Organization 44: 479–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelmann, E. A. 1993. Cops Across Borders. The Internationalization of US Criminal Law Enforcement. University Park (PA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rincón-Ruiz, A., G. Kallis. 2012. Caught in the middle, Colombia’s war on drugs and its effects on forest and people. Geoforum 46: 60–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rios Contreras, V. 2014. The Role of Drug-Related Violence and Extortion in Promoting Mexican Migration: Unexpected Consequences of a Drug War. Latin American Research Review 49: 199–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, L. R. S., A. A. Said. (Hrsg.). 1974. Drugs, Politics, and Diplomacy: The International Connection. Beverly Hills, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., G. Hooks, M. Lengefeld. 2014. The War on Drugs in Colombia: The Environment, the Treadmill of Destruction and Risk-Transfer Militarism. Journal of World-Systems Research 20: 185–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGASS. 2016. Outcome Document of the 2016 United Nations General Assembly Special Session on the World Drug Problem (New York, 19-21 April 2016). Our joint commitment to effectively addressing and countering the world drug problem. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 1964a. Official Records of United Nations Conference for the Adoption of a Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, New York, 1961 (Vol. I). New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 1964b. Official Records of United Nations Conference for the Adoption of a Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, New York, 1961 (Vol. II). New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 1991. Official Records of United Nations Conference for the Adoption of a convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Vol. II). New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 1998. Commentary on the United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Done at Vienna on 20 December 1988. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNODC. 2011. Ensuring availability of controlled medications for the relief of pain and preventing diversion and abuse. Striking the right balance to achieve the optimal public health outcome. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. 2012. The new Jim Crow: mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO/UNODC/UNAIDS. 2004. Position paper: Substitution maintenance therapy in the management of opioid dependence and HIV/AIDS prevention. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leibniz-Institut Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung (HSFK), Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland

    Eva Herschinger

Authors
  1. Eva Herschinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva Herschinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany

    Robert Feustel

  2. Universität Bremen , Bremen, Germany

    Henning Schmidt-Semisch

  3. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany

    Ulrich Bröckling

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Herschinger, E. (2019). Drogenpolitik und ihre (nicht-intendierten) Effekte. In: Feustel, R., Schmidt-Semisch, H., Bröckling, U. (eds) Handbuch Drogen in sozial- und kulturwissenschaftlicher Perspektive. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22138-6_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22138-6_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22137-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22138-6

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation