Advertisement

Gifted Education and the Matthew Effect

  • Leslie Margolin
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

The Matthew effect refers to the notion that advantaged people receive increasing advantages over time, while the disadvantaged wind up with increasing disadvantages. As worded in The Gospel According to Matthew: “For unto every one that hath shall be given, but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath.” With regard to education, this translates to students who are performing better will receive more credit and more educational opportunities, and hence will perform even better. Conversely, children who are performing poorly—who receive bad grades and receive few positive reinforcements for their scholarship - study less, and as a result develop academic skills more slowly, which further inhibits their academic growth. The Matthew effect has been observed among children with academic deficiencies (Gaultney, 1998), but has not yet been examined among children singled out for their academic strengths. This paper will show how this inequitable distribution of resources operates in gifted education - how children who are identified as gifted not only perform better in school, they are advantaged by their membership in privileged racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups (Ford, 2014) and are further advantaged by their access to better teachers, curriculum, and material support (Berlin, 2009; Henfield et al., 2008; Shaunessy et al., 2007). Secondly, this paper addresses the question of how these inequities continue, and proposes that the Matthew effect which so favors gifted children is covered and obscured by a counter narrative which portrays gifted children as unusually needy. Gifted child scholars and teachers mask the inequities of gifted education by systematically highlighting gifted children’s unhappiness, sensitivity, and victimization.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Akin, C.A. (2005): Asynchrony. Gifted Child Today 28, 60-66.Google Scholar
  2. Alsop, G. (2003): Asynchrony: Intuitively valid and theoretically reliable. Roeper Review 25, 118-127.Google Scholar
  3. Amend, E.R., Schuler, P., Beaver-Gavin, K. & Beights, R. (2009): A unique challenge: Sorting out differences between giftedness and Asperger’s disorder. Gifted Child Today 32, 57-63.Google Scholar
  4. Andronaco, J.A., Shute, R. & McLachlan, A. (2014): Exploring asynchrony as a theoretical framework for understanding giftedness: A case of cognitive dissidence? Roeper Review 36, 264-272.Google Scholar
  5. Assouline, S.G., Foley Nicpon, M., Colangelo, N. & O’Brien, M. (2008): The Paradox of giftedness and autism: Packet of information for professionals (PIP)—Revised. Iowa City: The University of Iowa, The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, B.D. & Friedman-Nimz, R. (2003): Gifted children, vertical equity, and state school finance policies and practices. Journal of Education Finance 28, 523-555.Google Scholar
  7. Berlin, J. (2009): It’s all a matter of perspective: Student perceptions on the impact of being labeled gifted and talented. Roeper Review 31, 217-223.Google Scholar
  8. Barnett, W.S. & Belfield, C.R. (2006): Early childhood development and social mobility. The Future of Children 16, 73-98.Google Scholar
  9. Barthes, R. (1972): Mythologies 1957. Comp. and trans. Annette Lavers. New York: Hill and Wang. Benbow, C.P. & Stanley, J.C. (1996): Inequity in equity: How “equity” can lead to inequity for high-potential students. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2, 249-292.Google Scholar
  10. Berlin, J. (2009): It’s all a matter of perspective: Student perceptions on the impact of being labeled gifted and talented. Roeper Review 31, 217-223.Google Scholar
  11. Berninger, V. W. & Abbott, R. D. (2013): Differences between children with dyslexia who are and are not gifted in verbal reasoning. Gifted Child Quarterly 57, 223-233.Google Scholar
  12. Borland, J.H. (2003): The death of giftedness: Gifted education without gifted children. In Borland, J.H. (ed.), Rethinking gifted education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press Columbia University, 105-124.Google Scholar
  13. Bracamonte, M. (2010): Twice-exceptional students: Who are they and What do they Need? Twice Exceptional Newsletter 39, 1-8.Google Scholar
  14. Brighthouse, H. & Swift, A. (2006): Equality, priority, and positional goods. Ethics 116, 471-497.Google Scholar
  15. Cartledge, G., Sentelle, J. L.S., Lambert, C.M. & Reed, E.S. (2002): To be young, gifted, and black?: A case study of positive interventions within an inner-city classroom of African American students. Journal of Negro Education 70, 243-254.Google Scholar
  16. Coleman, L.J. & Cross, T.L. (2001): Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance, and teaching. Waco. TX: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar
  17. Coleman, L.J. & Cross, T.L. (2014). Is being gifted a handicap?” Journal for the Education of the Gifted 37, 5-17.Google Scholar
  18. Cross, T.L. (2001): The rage of gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 24, 43-45.Google Scholar
  19. Cross, T.L. (2014): The effects of educational malnourishment on the psychological well-being of gifted students. Gifted Child Today. 37, 264-265.Google Scholar
  20. Cross, T. L., Gust-Brey, K., & Ball, P. B. (2002): A psychological autopsy of the suicide of an academically gifted student: Researchers’ and parents’ perspectives. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 247-264.Google Scholar
  21. Daniels, V. I. (1998): Minority students in gifted and special education Programs: The Case for Educational Equity. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 41-43.Google Scholar
  22. Davidson, J., & Davidson, B. (2004): Genius denied: How to stop wasting our brightest young minds. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  23. Davis, G. A. & Rimm, S. B. (1998): Education of the gifted and talented. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  24. Fears Floyd, E., McGinnis, J.L. & Grantham, T.C. (2011): Gifted education in rural environments. In: Castellano, J.A. & Frazier, A.D. (eds.): Special populations in gifted education: Understanding our most able students from diverse backgrounds. Waco: Prufrock Press, 27-46.Google Scholar
  25. Ford, D.Y. (1995): Desegregating gifted education: A need unmet. The Journal of Negro Education 64, 52-62.Google Scholar
  26. Ford, D. Y. (1998): The underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education. The Journal of Special Education 32, 4-14.Google Scholar
  27. Ford, D. Y. (2003): Equity and excellence: Culturally diverse students in gifted education. In: Colangelo, N. & Davis, G.A. (eds.): Handbook of gifted education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 506-520.Google Scholar
  28. Ford, D.Y (2014): Multicultural issues: Gifted education discrimination in McFadden v. Board of Education for Illinois School District U-46. Gifted Child Today 37, 188-193.Google Scholar
  29. Gallagher. J.J. (2004): No Child Left Behind and gifted education. Roeper Review 26, 121-123.Google Scholar
  30. Garland, A.F. & Zigler, E. (1999): Emotional and behavioral problems among highly intellectual gifted youth. Roeper Review 22, 41-44.Google Scholar
  31. Gaultney, J.F. (1998): Utilization deficiencies among children with learning disabilities. Learning-and-individual-differences 10, 13-28.Google Scholar
  32. Goerss, J. (2011): Asynchronous development (pp. 1-2): Retrieved from: www.sengifted.org/asynchronous-development.
  33. Grantham, T.C. (2004): Rocky Jones: Case study of a high-achieving black male’s motivation to participate in gifted classes. Roeper Review 26, 208-215.Google Scholar
  34. Grantham, T.C. & Ford, D.Y. (1998): A case study of the social needs of Danisha: An underachieving gifted African-American female. Roeper Review 21, 96-101.Google Scholar
  35. Grissom, J.A. & Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2011): Bureaucratic representation, distributional equity, and democratic values in the administration of public programs. Journal of Politics 72, 582-596.Google Scholar
  36. Grissom, J.A. & Redding, C. (2016): Discretion and disproportionality: Explaining the underrepresentation of high-achieving students of color in gifted programs. AERO Open 2, 2332858415622175.Google Scholar
  37. Gross, M.W.M. (2002): Social and emotional issues for exceptionally intellectually gifted students. In: Neihart, M., Reis, S., Robinson, N.M. & Moon, S.M. (eds.): The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?. Waco: Prufrock Press, 19-29.Google Scholar
  38. Hargrave, K. (2011): Stop Bullying: A tale of two girls. Gifted Child Today 33, 39-40.Google Scholar
  39. Hatt, B. (2012): Smartness as cultural practice in schools. American Educational Research Journal 49, 438-460.Google Scholar
  40. Hatt, B. (2016): Racializing smartness. Race, Ethnicity, and Education 19, 1141-1148.Google Scholar
  41. Hebert, T.P. & Beardsley, T. M. (2001): Jermaine: A critical case study of a black child living in rural Poverty. Gifted Child Quarterly 45, 85-103.Google Scholar
  42. Henfield, M.S., Moore, J. & Wood, C. (2008): Inside and outside gifted education programming: Hidden challenges for African American students. Exceptional Children 74, 433-450.Google Scholar
  43. Hernandez, D.J. (2011): Double jeopardy: How third-grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. The Annie E. Casey Foundation.Google Scholar
  44. Hollingworth, L. (1922): Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Hyatt, L. (2010): A case study of suicide of a gifted female adolescent: Implications for prediction and prevention. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 33, 514-535.Google Scholar
  46. Hyatt, L.A. & Cross, T.L. (2009): Understanding suicidal behavior of gifted students: Theory, factors, and cultural expectations. In: Shavinina, L.V. (ed.): International Handbook on Giftedness. Cham et al.: Springer, 537-556.Google Scholar
  47. Isaacs, A.F. (1965): Even inanimate objects receive better treatment, Gifted Child Quarterly 9, 169-170.Google Scholar
  48. Jackson, P.S. & Peterson, J. (2003): Depressive disorder in highly gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education 14, 175-186.Google Scholar
  49. Kao, G. & Thompson, J.S. (2003): Racial and ethnic stratification in educational achievement and attainment. Annual Review of Sociology 29, 417-442.Google Scholar
  50. Karnes, F.A., & Shaunessy, E. (2004). Gifted students with disabilities? Are we finding them? Gifted Child Today 27, 16-21.Google Scholar
  51. Karnes, F.A., Stephens, K.R. & Whorton, J.E. (2000): Certification and specialized competencies for teachers in gifted education programs. Roeper Review 22, 201-202.Google Scholar
  52. Kearney, K. (2000): Dysgraphia. In: Kiesa, K. (ed.): Uniquely gifted: Identifying and meeting the needs of twice exceptional students. Gilsum: Avocus Publishing, 7-8.Google Scholar
  53. King, E.W. (2005): Addressing the social and emotional needs of twice-exceptional Students. Council for Exceptional Children 38, 16-20.Google Scholar
  54. Long-Mitchell, L.A. (2011): High-achieving black adolescents’ perceptions of how their teachers impact their academic achievement. In: Castelanno, J.A. & Frazier, A.D. (eds.): Special populations in gifted education: Understanding our most able students from diverse backgrounds. Waco: Prufrock Press, 99-123.Google Scholar
  55. Lovett, P. (2011): Solutions for Jay and other underrepresented gifted minority students. Gifted Child Today 34, 55-59.Google Scholar
  56. McBee, M.T. (2006): A descriptive analysis of referral sources for gifted education screening by race and socioeconomic status. Journal of Advanced Academics 17, 103-111.Google Scholar
  57. McIntosh, P. (1988): White privilege and male privilege: A personal account of coming to see correspondence through work in women’s studies. Working Paper 189: 1-20. Wellesley: Wellesley Center for Research on Women.Google Scholar
  58. Maker, C.J. (1996): Identification of minority Students: A national problem, needed changes, and a promising solution. Gifted Child Quarterly 40, 41-50.Google Scholar
  59. Margolin, L. (1994): Goodness personified: The emergence of gifted children. Hawthorne: New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  60. Martin, L.T., Burns, R.M. & Schonlau, M. (2010): Mental disorders among gifted and nongifted youth: A selected review of the epidemiologic literature. Gifted Child Quarterly 54, 31-41.Google Scholar
  61. Massie, L. & Gagne, F. (2002): Gifts and talents as sources of envy in high school settings. Gifted Child Quarterly 46, 15-29.Google Scholar
  62. Mazie, S. (2009): An egalitarian critique of admission to New York City’s specialized schools. Theory and Research in Education 7, 5-25.Google Scholar
  63. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964): Signs. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Merry, M.S. (2008): Educational justice and the gifted. Theory and Research in Education 6, 47-70.Google Scholar
  65. Mississippi Department of Education (2014): The New Gifted Contact Persons Training. Retrieved from:www.made.k12.ms.us/…/gifted-contact-persons-training_20141009095312-3863132014.
  66. Mofield, E.L. & Peters, M.P. (2016): The Relationship between perfectionism and overexcitabilities in gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 38, 405-427.Google Scholar
  67. Moon, S.M. (2009): Myth 15: High-ability students don’t face problems and challenges. Gifted Child Quarterly 53, 274-276.Google Scholar
  68. National Association for Gifted Children (2012): Gifted education programming standards: A guide to planning and implementing high-quality services. Waco: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar
  69. National Association for Gifted Children. (2016): Gifted by state. Retrieved from: https://www.nagc.org/resources-publications/gifted-state.
  70. Neihart, M. (1999): The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being. Roeper Review 22, 10-17.Google Scholar
  71. Ng, S.J., Hill, M.F. & Rawlinson, C. (2016): Hidden in plain sight: The experiences of three twice exceptional students during their transfer to high school. Gifted Child Quarterly 60, 296-311.Google Scholar
  72. Nicholson-Crotty, S., Grissom, J.A., Nicholson-Crotty, J. & Redding, R. (2016): Disentangling the causal mechanisms of representative bureaucracy: Evidence from assignment of students to gifted programs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1-13.Google Scholar
  73. Olthouse, J. (2014): How do preservice teachers conceptualize giftedness? A meteaphor analysis. Roeper Review 36, 122-132.Google Scholar
  74. Pelchar, T.K. & Bain, S.K. (2014): Bullying and victimization among gifted children in school-level transitions, Journal for the Education of the Gifted 37, 319-336.Google Scholar
  75. Pendarvis, E.D., Howley, A.A. & Howley, C.B. (1990): The abilities of gifted children. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  76. Persell, C.H. (2010): Social class and educational equality. In: Banks, J.A. & McGhee Banks, C.A. (eds.): Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (7th ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 85-108.Google Scholar
  77. Peters, M.P. & Bain, S.K. (2011): Bullying and victimization rates among gifted and high-achieving students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 34, 624-643.Google Scholar
  78. Peterson, J.S. (2001): Gifted and at risk: Four longitudinal case studies. Roeper Review 24, 31-39.Google Scholar
  79. Peterson, J.S. (2009): Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Quarterly 53, 280-282.Google Scholar
  80. Peterson, J.S. (2012): Gifted children and bullying: Victims and perpetrators. Retrieved fromGoogle Scholar
  81. Peterson, J.S. (2014): Giftedness, trauma, and development: A qualitative longitudinal case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 37, 295-318.Google Scholar
  82. Peterson, J.S. & Ray, K.E. (2006): Bullying and the gifted: Victims, perpetrators, prevalence, and effects. Gifted Child Quarterly 50, 148-168.Google Scholar
  83. Peterson, J.S., Duncan, N. & Canaday, K. (2009): A longitudinal study of negative life events, stress, and school experiences of gifted youth. Gifted Child Quarterly 53, 34-49.Google Scholar
  84. Pfeiffer, S.I. & Stocking, V.B. (2000): Vulnerabilities of academically gifted students. Special Services in the Schools 16, 83-93.Google Scholar
  85. Piechowski, M.M. (2003): Emotional and spiritual giftedness. In: Colangelo, N. & Davis, G.A. (eds.): Handbook on Gifted Education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 403-416.Google Scholar
  86. Reardon, S.F. (2011): The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In: Duncan, G.J. & Murname, R. (eds.): Whither Opportunity? Rising Inequality, Schools, and Children’s Life Chances. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 91-116.Google Scholar
  87. Rimm, S. (1981): It’s dumb to be smart. Gifted Child Today 60, 58-60.Google Scholar
  88. Robinson, N.M. & Noble, K.D. (1991): Social-emotional development and adjustment of gifted children. In: Wang, M.C., Reynolds, M.C. & Walberg, H.J. (eds.): Handbook of Special Education. Research and Practice: Vol 4. Emerging Programs. New York: Teachers College Press, 57-76.Google Scholar
  89. Roscigno, V.J. (1998): Race and reproduction of educational advantage. Social Forces, 76, 1033-1060.Google Scholar
  90. Scott, M.B. & Lyman, S. M. (1968): Accounts. American Sociological Review 33, 46-62.Google Scholar
  91. Scott, M.S., Perou, R., Urbano, R., Hogan, A. & Gold, S. (1992): The Identification of giftedness: A comparison of white, Hispanic, & black families. Gifted Child Quarterly 36, 341-381.Google Scholar
  92. Shaunessy, F., MccHatton, P. Hughes, C. & Brice, A. (2007): Understanding the experience of bilingual, Latino/adolescents: Voices from gifted and general education. Roeper Review 29, 174-182.Google Scholar
  93. Schulz, S. (2005): The gifted: Identity construction through the practice of gifted education. International Education Journal 5, 117-128.Google Scholar
  94. Silverman, L.K. (1997): The construct of asynchronous development. Peabody Journal of Education 72, 36-58.Google Scholar
  95. Singer, L. (2000): If gifted=asynchronous development, then gifted/special needs=asynchrony squared. In: Kiesa, K. (ed.): Uniquely gifted: Identifying and meeting the needs of twice exceptional students. Gilsum: Avocus Publishing, 44-46.Google Scholar
  96. Smith, B.W., Dempsey, A.G., Jackson, S.E., Olenchak, F.R. & Gaa, J. (2012): Cyberbullying among gifted children. Gifted Education International 28, 112-126.Google Scholar
  97. Smith, J., Le Rose, B. & Clasen, R. E. (1991): Underrepresentation of minority students in gifted programs: Yes! It matters. Gifted Child Quarterly 35, 81-83.Google Scholar
  98. State Advisory Council for Gifted Education and the Kentucky Department of Education (2016). Gifted and talented coordinator handbook. Retrieved from: www.ky.gov.education.
  99. Sykes, G.M. & Matza, D. (1957): Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review 22, 664-670.Google Scholar
  100. Terman, L.M. (1922): Were they born that way? World’s Work, 44 (Oct.), 660.Google Scholar
  101. Terman, L.M. (1925): Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children (Vol. 1: Genetic studies of genius). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Terman, L.M. & Oden, M.H. (1947): The gifted child grows up (Vol. 4: Genetic studies of genius). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Turk, N.T. & Campbell, D.A. (2002): What’s wrong with Doug: The Academic struggles of a gifted Student with ADHD from Preschool to College. Gifted Child Today 48, 48-65.Google Scholar
  104. Vialle, W.E., Heaven, P.C.L. & Ciarrochi, J. (2007): On being gifted, but sad and misunderstood: Social, emotional, and academic outcomes of gifted students in the Wollongong youth study. Educational Research and Evaluation 13, 569-586.Google Scholar
  105. Webb, J.R., Amend, E.R., Webb, N.E., Goerss, J., Beljan, P. & Olenchak, F.R. (2005): Misdiagnosis and dual diagnosis of gifted children and adults: ADHD, bipolar, OCD, Asperger’s, depression, and other disorders. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.Google Scholar
  106. Willard-Holt, C., Weber, J., Morrison, K.L. & Horgan, J. (2013): Twice-exceptional learners’ perspectives on effective learning strategies. Gifted Child Quarterly 57, 247-262.Google Scholar
  107. Winkler, D. & Voight, A. (2016): Giftedness and overexcitability: Investigating the relationship using meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly 60, 243-257.Google Scholar
  108. Yeung, R. (2012): Gifted education: Robin Hood or the Sheriff of Nottingham? Education and Urban Society 20, 1-28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EducationUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations