Regime Implications of Legislative Institutionalization in Post-Authoritarian Societies
The paper discusses regime implications of legislative institutionalization in post-authoritarian societies. Specifically, it addresses the role of legislatures in the process of democratic transition and consolidation. It contributes to explaining roles of legislatures in post-authoritarian societies after they complete the process of legislative institutionalization and develop full institutional capacity. The paper makes a case for the importance of theory development to address the needs of post-authoritarian societies in their democratic pursuits. It builds on well-established theories of evolutionary and historic institutionalism and contributes to further development of these theories by offering an additional perspective – compassionate institutionalism.
SchlagworteParliament democratic transition legislative institutionalization compassionate institutionalism regime transformation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Copeland, Gary W., and Samuel C. Patterson. 1994. Changing an Institutionalized System. In Parliaments in the Modern World: Changing Institutions, eds. Gary W. Copeland and Samuel C. Patterson, 151-160. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Copeland, Gary W., and Samuel C. Patterson. 1998. Parliaments and Legislatures. In World Encyclopedia of Parliaments and Legislatures, ed. George T. Kurian. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Book.Google Scholar
- D’Anieri, Paul, Robert Kravchuk, and Taras Kuzio. 1999. Politics and Society in Ukraine. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Huntington, Samuel P. 1965. Congressional Responses to the Twentieth Century. In Congress and America’s Future, ed. David B. Truman. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Khmelko, Irina. 2015. Legislative Strengthening Programs in Ukraine. USAID Center for Democracy and Government. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00KTXM.pdf.
- March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1995. Democratic Governance. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1984. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review 78 (3): 734-49.Google Scholar
- Olson, David, M. 1994. Democratic Legislative Institutions: A Comparative View. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
- Olson, David M., and Philip Norton, eds. 1996. The New Parliaments of Central and Eastern Europe. London: Frank Class.Google Scholar
- Ostrow, Joel M. 2000. Comparing Post-Soviet Legislatures: A Theory of Institutional Design and Political Conflict. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
- Patzelt, Werner J. 2010. Parliamentary Institution Building by using Blueprints: The Case of former East Germany and its present State Parliaments. Paper presented at 2010 SPSA Annual Meeting, January 2010. http://rc08.ipsa.org/public/2010_Papers/Patzelt_2010_ParliamentaryInstitutionBuildingbyusingBlue.pdf.
- Patzelt, Werner J. 2011. Connecting Theory and Practice of Legislative Institutionalization. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, January 2011. http://rc08.ipsa.org/public/2011_papers/Patzelt_2011_Connecting_Theory_and_Practice_of_Legislative_Institutio.pdf.
- Polsby, Nelson W. 1990. Legislatures. In Legislatures, ed. Philip Norton, 129-148. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Remington, Thomas F., ed. 1994. Parliaments in Transition: The New Legislative Politics in the Former USSRE and Eastern Europe. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Wise, Charlies R., Trevor L. Brown, and Vladimir Pigenko. 1999. Measuring Parliamentary Development: The Case of Ukraine’s National Parliament. Paper prepared for presentation at the Midwest Political Science Association Meetings, Chicago, IL, April 15-17.Google Scholar