Maritime logistics in global value chains: mastering an era of ideas, information and integration

Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Two waves of global economic development, falling transportation costs and falling costs for the exchange of information and ideas, disintegrated value chains into task-by-task competition. No longer is there competition between vertically ingetrated organisations, but between individual business activities, or tasks, performed in different nations. The recent efforts of organisations to adapt to these developments are superseded by an upcoming third wave of falling costs of information manipulation and storage. This, what we might call digitalisation, enables organisations to re-integrate, both in terms of process design and introduction of digital tools, to support their activities. Maritime logistics benefited substantially from the first and second waves. The sector needs to be watchful for changes affecting its business models from the third wave to meet the changing needs of their trading and manufacturing clients. However, organisational change costs financial and mental resources. Firms need to sacrifice today’s cash flow to innovate and to reap future benefits of change, and they need to beat their internal inertia. This paper will use Baldwin’s concept of the Two Unbundlings to explain globalisation from a historical perspective and to assess the implications of this development on the logistics industry. Firms in the maritime industry need to assess their corporate sustainability. The paper introduces the Corporate Sustainability-Value Added Model which helps firms to analyse where they stand managing the trade-off between profitability and innovation. Along these dimensions the model identifies strategy categories; these guide firms towards more favourable competitive positions. But beware: the bargain between innovation and value-added might result in a corporate “coffin corner” – a synonym in aviation for saving fuel in high altitudes at the risk of losing lift due to lower air density – resembling a paradox of trying to achieve extensive innovative capability and at the same time superior financial performance.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Baldwin, R. (2006): Globalisation: The great unbundling(s). Prime Minister’s Office/Economic Council of Finland. A contribution to the Project “Globalisation Challenges for Europe and Finland. www.eu2006.fi.
  2. Baldwin, R. (2011): Trade and Industrialisation after Globalisation’s 2nd Unbundling: How Building and Joining a Supply Chain are Different and Why it Matters, in: National Bureau of Economic Research: Working Paper 17716, http://www.nber.org/papers/w17716.
  3. Baldwin, R. (2012): WTO 2.0: Global governance of supply chain trade, in: Centre for Economic Policy Research, Policy Insight No. 64, December 2012, www.cepr.org.
  4. Bernstein, W. (2008): A Splendid Exchange: How Trade Shaped the World, Grove PressChristopher, M. (2011): Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 4th ed., Harlow: PearsonGoogle Scholar
  5. Cowan, C. C.; Todorovic, N. (2000): “Spiral dynamics: the layers of human values i.n strategy”, in: Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 28 No. 1, 4-12.Google Scholar
  6. Dynamar B.V. (pub.) (2017): Deepsea Ro/Ro Shipping II, Alkmaar.Google Scholar
  7. Ferguson, N. (2011): The Six Killer Apps of Western Power. Pinguin, London.Google Scholar
  8. Karboul, A. (2017): Coffin Corner Warum auch die besten Firmen abstürzen können, 2. ed Midas Management.Google Scholar
  9. Landon, F. (2017): Port development: Building ports ´future ready´ is becoming harder to achieve, in: Port Strategy, October 2017.Google Scholar
  10. Leclere, J.-C. (2016): Zusammenhang zwischen Corporate Sustainability und Innovation: Das CS/IModell. AV Akademikerverlag, Saarbrücken.Google Scholar
  11. Manders, S. (2017): Keep ahead with the game-changers, in: Ports and Harbours. Journal of the International Association of Ports and Harbours. Vol. 62, No. 5, Sep/Oct 2017, 10-11.Google Scholar
  12. Millar, M. (2017): Global Freight Forwarding – Overview of global forwarding sector and its impact on globalization. On: http://www.focuescargonetwork.com, accessed 07.09.2017.
  13. Stern, J.; Stewart, G. Bennett; Chew, D. (1994): The EVA Financial Management System, in: Journal for Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 8, No. 2, 32-46.Google Scholar
  14. Stopford, M. (2009): Maritime Economics. 3rd ed. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  15. The Economist (ed) (2017a): Adidas’ „Speedfactory“, 14.01.2017.Google Scholar
  16. The Economist (ed) (2017b): Wait for parts, 07.10.2017.Google Scholar
  17. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2016): Review of Maritime Transport, Geneva.Google Scholar
  18. Veenstra, A. W. (2015): Maritime Transport and Logistics as a Trade Facilitator, in: Song, Dong-Wook; Panayides, Phatos: Maritime Logistics, 2. ed. Kogan, London.Google Scholar
  19. Vries, P. (2012): Europe and the rest: Braudel on capitalism, on: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282184064, accessed 02.09.2017.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BremerhavenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations