Managing risks under highly dependent supplier-producer relation in modern automotive industry

  • Arshia Khan


Outsourcing, modularization and other modern supply chain approaches have increased the dependence on modern supply chains, since automobile producers prefer to get complete modules from a few suppliers, instead of getting components and building parts in-house. This dependence on supply chain has made them vulnerable to risks; many incidents happened when automotive producers had to stop the production because of first or second tier suppliers. In this paper we analysed how automotive producers are managing high dependence in the supply chain and how suppliers perceive the orignal equipment manufacturer (OEM). For this purpose, we compare policies from three German automotive companies by which they manage relations with the suppliers, moreover it is investigated how suppliers perceive the regulation policies of automotive companies. The analysis showed that when the companies are highly dependent on the supplier, the management of supplier-producer relation is more efficient while when the dependence is less, and the management of relation with supplier is inefficent.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adamowski, J.; Robinson, S. (2017). PSA halts 3008 production after supplier plant fire. Plant customers also include Renault, Daimler, BMW and Volkswagen, (accessed April 2017).
  2. Automotive News (2005). Volkswagen to form long-term supplier partnerships-Deal reached with union over plant shifts, (accessed May 2017).
  3. Automotive News Europe (2016). VW ready to seize withheld parts from supplier plants, report says, (accessed May 2017).
  4. Baldwin, C.; Clark, K. (2006). Modularity in the design of complex engineering systems. Complex engineered systems, 175-205.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, D.; Klug, F. (2012). Logistics supplier integration in the automotive industry.International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(11), 1281-1305.Google Scholar
  6. BMW Group (2014). BMW Group International Terms and Conditions for the Purchase of Production Materials and Automotive Component, (accessed April 2017).
  7. Boysen, N.; Emde, S., Hoeck; M.; Kauderer, M. (2015). Part logistics in the automotive industry: Decision problems, literature review and research agenda. European Journal of Operational Research, 242(1), 107-120.Google Scholar
  8. Cabigiosu, A.; Zirpoli, F.; Camuffo, A. (2013). Modularity, interfaces definition and the integration of external sources of innovation in the automotive industry.Google Scholar
  9. Childerhouse, P.; Hermiz, R.; Mason-Jones, R. (2003). Information flow in automotive supply chainspresent industrial practice. Industrial Management & Data Systems 103 (3), 137–149.Google Scholar
  10. Christensen, C. M.; Raynor, M.E. (2003). The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  11. Collins, R.; Bechler, K.; Pires, S. (1997). Outsourcing in the automotive industry: from JIT to modular consortia. European management journal, 15(5), 498-508.Google Scholar
  12. Daimler (2016a). Responsibility along the supply chain, (accessed May 2016).
  13. Doran, D. (2004). Rethinking the supply chain: an automotive perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(1), 102-109.Google Scholar
  14. Doran, D.; Hill, A.; Hwang, K. S.; Jacob, G.; Operations Research Group (2007). Supply chain modularization: Cases from the French automobile industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 106(1), 2-11.Google Scholar
  15. Fini. M (2012). SuRe (Supplier Relationship)index,
  16. Grohn (2002): Interview with Mr. F. Grohn, Member of Volkswagen’s corporate management for global and forward sourcing, 21st of March 2002, Wolfsburg.Google Scholar
  17. Harrison, A.; Van Hoek, R. I. (2008). Logistics management and strategy: competing through the supply chain. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  18. Himmelreich, H (2014). 4 Outsourcing Lessons IT Can Learn From Automakers. Automakers get 80% of a vehicle’s components from suppliers. Why are they better at outsourcing than IT?, (accessed April 2017).
  19. Investopedia (2015). Who are Daimler / Mercedes’ (DAI) main suppliers?, (ac-cessed May 2016).
  20. just-auto (2004). UK: Pischetsrieder is overlooking the obvious as he faces up to financial prob-lems, (accessed May 2017).
  21. Kamp, B. (2015). Examination Of Dedicated Relationships Between Automotive Suppliers And Carmakers: Evidence On The Flagship/5 Partners Model. Business Development: Outsourcing, Teamwork and Business Management.: Key’s for Exponential Growth, 191.Google Scholar
  22. Kollewe, J. (2016). VW settles dispute that stopped output at half of German plants (accessed May 2017).
  23. Kotha, S.; Olesen, D. G.; Nolan, R.; Condit, P. M. (2005). Boeing 787: Dreamliner. Harvard Business School Case Study, 9-305.Google Scholar
  24. Larsson, A. (2002). The development and regional significance of the automotive industry: supplier parks in Western Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(4), 767-784.Google Scholar
  25. Lopez, E.; McKevitt, J (2017). BMW halts production as Bosch fails to meet supply needs, (accessed April 2017).
  26. McElroy, J. (2012). How Volkswagen is to run like no other car company, (accessed May 2017).
  27. McElroy, J. (2013), Today’s VW Looks Like Sloan’s GM, (accessed April 2017).
  28. Morris, D.; Donnelly, T.; Donnelly, T. (2004). Supplier parks in the automotive industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(2), 129-133.Google Scholar
  29. Needle, D. (2010). Business in context: An introduction to business and its environment. Cengage Learning EMEA.Google Scholar
  30. Pandremenos, J.; Paralikas, J.; Salonitis, K.; Chryssolouris, G. (2009). Modularity concepts for the automotive industry: a critical review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 1(3), 148-152.Google Scholar
  31. Rhodes, E.; Warren, J. P.; Carter, R. (Eds.). (2009). Supply chains and total product systems: a reader. John Wiley & 172.Google Scholar
  32. Rice Jr., J.B.; Caniato, F. (2003). Building a secure and resilient supply network. Supply Chain Management Review 7 (5), 22–30.Google Scholar
  33. Sako, M.; Murray, F. (1999). Modules in design, production and use: implications for the global auto industry. In IMVP Annual Sponsors Meeting.Google Scholar
  34. Schwartz, J.; Cremer, A. Reuters (2016). VW reviews supplier strategy after dispute hits production, (accessed May 2017).
  35. Sheffi, Y.; Rice Jr., J.B. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise.MIT Sloan Management Review 47 (1), 41–48.Google Scholar
  36. Thun, J. H.; Hoenig, D. (2011).An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 242-249.Google Scholar
  37. Ukessays (2015). The Supply Chain Management In Volkswagen Marketing Essay, (accessed May 2017).
  38. Ülkü, S.; Schmidt, G. M. (2011). Matching product architecture and supply chain configuration. Production and Operations Management, 20(1), 16-31.Google Scholar
  39. Volkswagen (1981-2002), Geschäftsbericht 1980-2001, Wolfsburg.Google Scholar
  40. Volkswagen Autoeuropa (o. J.). General Purchase Order Conditions, (accessed May 2017).
  41. WardsAuto (2005). BMW Outsourcing, (accessed April 2017).
  42. Zimmer, K. (2002). Supply chain coordination with uncertain just-in-time delivery. International journal of production economics, 77(1), 1-15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BremenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations