Partizipation und Moderne: Nutzerorientierte Technikentwicklung als missverstandene Herausforderung

Chapter
Part of the Vechtaer Beiträge zur Gerontologie book series (VEBEGE)

Zusammenfassung

Der demographische Wandel gilt als eine der größten Herausforderungen spätmoderner Gesellschaften (Drucker 2002; Kohlbacher & Herstatt 2011). Die zunehmende Zahl älterer Menschen gilt einerseits als Risiko für etwaige Sicherungssysteme, Firmen, Institutionen und die Wirtschaft im Allgemeinen sowie andererseits als neue Chance in verschiedener Hinsicht. Als Risiken werden die abnehmende Zahl der Erwerbsfähigen, ein allgemeiner Wissensverlust, eine sinkende Kaufkraft sowie hohe Kosten der medizinischen und pflegerischen Versorgung genannt.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Akrich, Madeleine (1992): The de-scription of technical objects. In Bijker, Wiebe; Law, John (eds.): Shaping technology ⁄ building society: studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge: MIT Press, 205–225.Google Scholar
  2. Berger, Johannes (2002): Die Versprachlichung des Sakralen und die Entsprachlichung der Ökonomie. In: Axel Honneth & Hans Joas (Hrsg.): Kommunikatives Handeln. Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas’ ‘‘Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns’’. (3. Aufl.), Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 255–277.Google Scholar
  3. Bertsche, B., Bullinger, H.-J., 2007. Entwicklung und Erprobung innovativer Produkte – Rapid Prototyping – Grundlagen, Rahmenbedingungen und Realisierung. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Bijker, Wiebe E. (1997): Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs. Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blackman, Tim (2013): Care robots for the supermarket shelf: a product gap in assistive technologies. In: Ageing and Society, 33 (5), 763-781.Google Scholar
  6. Blumenberg, Hans (1981): Lebenswelt und Technisierung unter Aspekten der Phänomenologie. In: Ders.: Wirklichkeiten in denen wir leben. Aufsätze und eine Rede. Stuttgart: Reclam, 7–54.Google Scholar
  7. Bowker, Geoffrey C. & Susan Leigh Star (1999): Sorting things out. Classification and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Braun, Kathrin & Susanne Schultz Susanne (2010): ‘‘… a certain amount of engineering involved’’. Constructing the public in participatory governance arrangements. In: Public Understanding of Science, 19 (4), 403–419.Google Scholar
  9. Brul Mark, Rianne Huis In ‘t Veld, Lisette ven Gemert-Pijnen, Charles Willems & Hermie Hermens (2010). Designing a telecare system for caregivers: A user-centered approach using scenarios. In: Gerontechnology, 9 (2), 175–176.Google Scholar
  10. Burawoy, Michael (1982): Manufacturing consent. Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Callén, Blanca, Miquel Domènech, Daniel López & Francisco Tirado (2009): Telecare research: (Cosmo)politicizing methodology. In: ALTER – European Journal of Disability Research / Revue Européenne de Recherche sur le Handicap, 3 (2), 110–122.Google Scholar
  12. Callon, Michel (1986): Elements of a sociology of translation. Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc bay. In: John Law (ed.): Power, action and belief. A new Sociology of knowledge? London: Routledge, 196–233.Google Scholar
  13. Callon, Michel (1991): Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In: John Law (ed.): A sociology of monsters. Essays on power, technology and domination. London: Routledge, 132–161.Google Scholar
  14. Carroll, John M. (ed.) (1995a): Scenario-based design. Envisioning work and technology in system development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Carroll, John M. (1995b): Introduction. The Scenario Perspective on System Development. In: Ders. (ed.): Scenario-based design. Envisioning work and technology in system development. New York, NY: Wiley, 1–17.Google Scholar
  16. Chilvers, Jason (2008): Deliberating Competence. Theoretical and practitioner perspectives on effective Participatory Appraisal practice. In: Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33 (3), 421–451.Google Scholar
  17. Clarkson, John, Roger Coleman, Simeon Keates & Cherie Lebbon, C. (eds.) (2003): Inclusive design. Design for the whole population. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Compagna, Diego (2011): Partizipative Technikentwicklung: Eine soziologische Betrachtung und Reflexion. Duisburg: Universität Duisburg (Working Papers kultur- und techniksoziologische Studien). Duisburg: Institut für Soziologie der Universität Duisburg-EssenGoogle Scholar
  19. Compagna, Diego (2012): Lost in translation? The dilemma of alignment within participatory technology developments. In: Poiesis & Praxis, 9 (1–2), 125–143.Google Scholar
  20. Compagna, Diego & Stefan Derpmann (2009): Verfahren partizipativer Technikentwicklung. Duisburg: Universität Duisburg (Working Papers kultur- und techniksoziologische Studien) Duisburg: Institut für Soziologie der Universität Duisburg-Essen.Google Scholar
  21. Compagna, Diego, Stefan Derpmann & Kathrin Mauz (2009): The operation of autonomous mobile robot assistants in the environment of care facilities adopting a usercentered development design. In: Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, 5 (5), 11–24.Google Scholar
  22. Compagna, Diego, Stefan Derpmann, Thorsten Helbig & Karen A. Shire (2011): Fazit: Generierung einer Wissenstransferschleife für partizipative Technikentwicklung im Pflegedienstleistungssektor. Working Brief 35. Duisburg: Institut für Soziologie der Universität Duisburg-Essen.Google Scholar
  23. Cooper, Alan (1999): The inmates are running the asylum: why high-tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. Indianapolis: Sams Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Czaja, Sara J. &Richard Schulz (2006): Innovations in Technology and Aging: Introduction. In: Generations, 30 (2), 6–8.Google Scholar
  25. Dienel, Hans-Liudger, Alexander Peine & Heather Cameron (2004): New participative tools in product development for seniors. In: David C. Burdick & Sunkyo Kwon Sunkyo (eds.): Gerotechnology: Research and practice in technology and aging. New York: Springer, 224–238.Google Scholar
  26. Drucker, Peter F. (1985): Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  27. Drucker, Peter F. (2002): Managing in the next society. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.Google Scholar
  28. Durkheim, Émile (1999): Über soziale Arbeitsteilung. Studie über die Organisation höherer Gesellschaften. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  29. Ebel, Roland H., Willam Wagoner & Henry F. Hrubecky (1979): Get ready for the LBomb: a peliminary social assessment of longevity technology. In: Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 13, 131–148.Google Scholar
  30. Eijndhoven, Josée van & Rinie van Est (2002): The choice of participatory technology assessment methods. In: Simon Joss & Sergio Bellucci (eds.): Participatory technology assessment. European perspectives. London: Center for the Study of Democracy, 209–234.Google Scholar
  31. Erickson, Thomas (1995): Notes on design practice. Stories and prototypes as catalysts for communication. In: John M. Carroll (ed.): Scenario-based design. Envisioning work and technology in system development. New York: Wiley, 37–58.Google Scholar
  32. Felt, Ulrike & Maximilian Fochler (2010): Machineries for making publics. Inscribing and de-scribing publics in public engagement. In: Minerva, 48 (3), 219–238.Google Scholar
  33. Fisk, Arthur D., Wendy A. Rogers, Neil Charness, Sara J. Czaja & Joseph Sharit (2009): Designing for older adults. Principles and creative human factors approaches. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  34. Fung, Archon (2006): Varieties of participation in complex governance. In: Public Administration Review, 66 (Special Issue), 66–75.Google Scholar
  35. Gassmann, Oliver & Gerrit Reepmeyer (2011): Universal design: innovations for all ages. In: Florian Kohlbacher & Cornelius Herstatt (eds.): The silver market phenomenon. Marketing and innovation in the aging society. Berlin: Springer, 101–116.Google Scholar
  36. Glaser, Barney G. & Anselm Strauss (1998): Grounded theory. Strategien qualitativer Forschung. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  37. Habermas, Jürgen (2006a): Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (Band 2). Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  38. Habermas, Jürgen (2006b): Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (Band 1). Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  39. Heintz, Bettina (2000): Die Innenwelt der Mathematik. Zur Kultur und Praxis einer beweisenden Disziplin. Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Husserl, Edmund (1992): Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. In: Ders.: Gesammelte Schriften 8. Cartesianische Meditationen. Krisis. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  41. Hyysalo, Sampsa (2006): Representations of use and practice-bound imaginaries in automating safety of the elderly. In: Social Studies of Science, 36 (4), 599–626.Google Scholar
  42. Joss, Simon & Sergio Bellucci (eds.) (2002): Participatory technology assessment. European perspectives. London: Center for the Study of Democracy.Google Scholar
  43. Jouvenel, Hugues de (2000): A brief methodological guide to scenario building. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 65 (1), 37–48.Google Scholar
  44. Kohlbacher, Florian (2011): Business implications of demographic change in Japan. Chances and challenges for human resource and marketing management. In: Florian Coulmas & Ralph Lützeler (eds.): Imploding populations in Japan and Germany. A comparison. Leiden: Brill, 269–294.Google Scholar
  45. Kohlbacher, Florian & Chang C. Hang (2011): Applying the disruptive innovation framework to the silver market: technology adoption and deployment for older consumers. In: Ageing International, 36 (1), 82–101.Google Scholar
  46. Kohlbacher, Florian & Cornelius Herstatt (2009): “Silver Products” development: the reality of r&d in firms in Japan. In: The R&D Management Conference 2009, Vienna, 21–24 June 2009.Google Scholar
  47. Kohlbacher, Florian / Herstatt, Cornelius (Eds.) (2011): The Silver Market Phenomenon: Marketing and Innovation in the Aging Society (2nd ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  48. Kohlbacher, Florian, Pascal Gudorf & Cornelius Herstatt (2011): Japan’s growing silver market – an attractive business opportunity for foreign companies? In: Michael Boppel, Stephan Boehm & Sven Kunisch (eds.): From grey to silver: managing the demographic change successfully. Heidelberg: Springer, 189–205.Google Scholar
  49. Konrad, Kornelia (2004): Prägende Erwartungen. Szenarien als Schrittmacher der Technikentwicklung. Berlin: Edition Sigma.Google Scholar
  50. Langer, Judith (1984): Changing demographics: stimulus for new product ideas. In: Journal of Consumer Marketing, 1 (2), 35–43.Google Scholar
  51. Latour, Bruno (1991): Technology is society made durable. In: John Law (ed.): A sociology of monsters. Essays on power, technology and domination. London: Routledge, 103–131.Google Scholar
  52. Latour, Bruno (1992): Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: Wiebe Bijker & John Law (eds.): Shaping technology ⁄ building society: studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  53. Latour, Bruno (1997): Der Pedologenfaden von Boa Vista. Eine photo-philosophische Montage. In: Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, Michael Hagner & BettinaWahrig-Schmidt (Hrsg.): Räume des Wissens. Repräsentation, Codierung, Spur. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 213–264.Google Scholar
  54. Latour, Bruno (1999): On recalling ANT. In: John Law & John Hassard (eds.): Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell, 15–25.Google Scholar
  55. Lauener Angela, Frances Slack, Andy Dearden, Chris Roast, Simeon Yates & Steve Cassidy (2006): Methodologies for working with older people: pastiche scenarios. In: Gerontechnology, 5 (1), 16–28.Google Scholar
  56. Law, John (1999): Technology, closure and heterogeneous engineering. The case of the Portuguese expansion. In: Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes & Trevor J. Pinch (eds.): The social construction of technological systems. New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 111–134.Google Scholar
  57. Luhmann, Niklas (1999): Arbeitsteilung und Moral. Durkheims Theorie. In: Ders.: Über soziale Arbeitsteilung. Studie über die Organisation höherer Gesellschaften. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 19–38.Google Scholar
  58. Luhmann, Niklas (2003): Macht. Stuttgart: Lucius und Lucius.Google Scholar
  59. Mack, Robert L. (1995): Discussion. Scenarios as engines of design. In: John M. Carroll (ed.): Scenario-based design. Envisioning work and technology in system development. New York: Wiley, 361–386.Google Scholar
  60. MacKay, Brad & Paul Tambeau (2013): A structuration approach to scenario praxis. In Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80 (4), 673–686.Google Scholar
  61. Magnus, George (2009): The age of aging: how demographics are changing the global economy and our world. Singapore: Wiley & Sons (Asia).Google Scholar
  62. Neven, Louis (2010): ‘But obviously not for me’: robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. In: Sociology of Health & Illness, 32, (2), 335–347.Google Scholar
  63. Neveryd, Håkan, Johan Molenbroek & Paul Panek (2002): FRR – Friendly rest rooms for ederly and disabled persons – a user centered R&D project. In: Gerontechnology, 2 (1), 94.Google Scholar
  64. Östlund, Britt (2011): Silver age innovators: a new approach to old users. In: Florian Kohlbacher & Cornelius FlorianHerstatt (eds.): The silver market phenomenon. Marketing and innovation in the aging society. Berlin: Springer, 15–26.Google Scholar
  65. Parsons, Talcott (1975): Gesellschaften. Evolutionäre und komparative Perspektiven. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  66. Parsons, Talcott (1976): Zur Theorie sozialer Systeme. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  67. Parsons, Talcott (1991): The social system. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Peine, Alexander & Louis Neven (2011): Social-structural lag revisited. In: Gerontechnology, 10 (3), 129–139.Google Scholar
  69. Peine, Alexander & Andrea M. Herrmann (2012): The sources of use knowledge: towards integrating the dynamics of technology use and design in the articulation of societal challenges. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79 (8), 1495–1512.Google Scholar
  70. Peine. Alexander & Ingo Rollwagen (2009): The rise of the “innosumer” – how the baby boomers will shape the future of consumer products. Paper presented at the European University Institute’s “Max Weber Fellow’s Contribution to the Social Sciences and Humanities” Conference, 10–13 June 2009 (Ms).Google Scholar
  71. Pinch, Trevor J. & Wiebe E. Bijker (1999): The social construction of facts and artifacts. Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In: Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas Hughes, & Treovor Pinch (eds.): The social construction of technological systems. New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge: MIT Press, 17–50.Google Scholar
  72. Pirkl, James J. (2011): Transgenerational design: a heart transplant for housing. In: Florian Kohlbacher & Cornelius Herstatt (eds.): The silver market phenomenon. Marketing and innovation in the aging society. Berlin: Springer, 117–131.Google Scholar
  73. Pols, Jeannette & Ingunn Moser (2009): Cold technologies versus warm care? On affective and social relations with and through care technologies. In: ALTER – European Journal of Disability Research / Revue Européenne de Recherche sur le Handicap, 3 (2), 159–178.Google Scholar
  74. Popper, Karl R. (2005): Logik der Forschung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  75. Powell, Jason L. (2010): The power of global aging. In: Ageing International, 35 (1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  76. Pruitt, John & Tamara Adlin (2005): The persona lifecycle. Keeping people in mind throughout product design. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  77. Rammert, Werner (1998): Die Form der Technik und die Differenz der Medien. Auf dem Weg zu einer pragmatistischen Techniktheorie. In: Ders. (Hrsg.): Technik und Sozialtheorie. Frankfurt: Campus, 293–326.Google Scholar
  78. Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (1997): Von der Zelle zum Gen. Repräsentationen der Molekularbiologie. In: Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, Michael Hagner & Bettina Wahrig-Schmidt (Hrsg.): Räume des Wissens. Repräsentation, Codierung, Spur.. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 265–279.Google Scholar
  79. Rosson, Mary B. & John M. Carroll (2003): Scenario-based design. In: Julie A. Jacko & Andrew Sears (eds.): The human-computer interaction handbook. Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications. Mahwah: Erlbaum, 1032–1050.Google Scholar
  80. Schmidt-Ruhland, Karin & Mathias Knigge, (2011): Integration of the rlderly into the design process. In: Florian Kohlbacher & Cornelius Herstatt (eds.): The silver market phenomenon: marketing and innovation in the aging society. Heidelberg: Springer, 45–63.Google Scholar
  81. Schreuer, Anna, Michael Ornetzeder & Harald Rohracher (2010): Negotiating the local embedding of socio-technical experiments. A case study in fuel cell technology. In: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22 (6), 729–743.Google Scholar
  82. Schuitmaker, Tjerk Jan (2012): Identifying and unravelling persistent problems. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79 (6), 1021–1031.Google Scholar
  83. Smedt, Peter de, Kristian Borch & Ted Fuller (2013): Future scenarios to inspire innovation. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80 (3), 432–443.Google Scholar
  84. Star, Susan L. & James R. Griesemer (1989): Institutional ecology. ‘Translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939. In: Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.Google Scholar
  85. Strauss, Anselm L. & Juliet Corbin (1996): Grounded theory. Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  86. Strübing, Jörg (1997): Symbolischer Interaktionismus revisited. Konzepte für die Wissenschafts- und Technikforschung. In: Zeitschrift für Soziologie 26 (5), 368–386.Google Scholar
  87. Taipale V.T. (2002): Combining needs and technological opportunities for success: usercentered design for independent living – a Finnish R&D approach. In: Gerontechnology, 2 (1), 135.Google Scholar
  88. Torrington, Judith (2009): The design of technology and environments to support enjoyable activity for people with dementia. In: ALTER – European Journal of Disability Research / Revue Européenne de Recherche sur le Handicap, 3 (2), 123–137Google Scholar
  89. Weber, Max (1994): Wissenschaft als Beruf. In: Ders.: Wissenschaft als Beruf. Politik als Beruf. Tübingen: Mohr, 1–23.Google Scholar
  90. Wehling, Peter (2012): From invited to uninvited participation (and back?): Rethinking civil society engagement in technology assessment and development. In: Poiesis & Praxis, 9 (1–2), 43–60.Google Scholar
  91. Wellmer, Albrecht (1967): Methodologie als Erkenntnistheorie. Zur Wissenschaftslehre Karl R. Poppers. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  92. Wright, George, George Cairns & Ron Bradfield, Ron (eds.) (2013): Current developments in theory and practice. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80 (4), 561–838.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Projekt „Sozio-technische Interaktion von Mensch und Roboter im demografischen Wandel (MTI-engAge)“Technische Universität BerlinBerlinDeutschland

Personalised recommendations