Syriza, Podemos and Mobilizations Against Austerity: Movements, Parties or Movement-Parties?

Chapter
Part of the Bürgergesellschaft und Demokratie book series (BÜD)

Abstract

This chapter traces the development of two political parties during the last few years, Syriza in Greece and Podemos in Spain: adopting a broad anti-austerity agenda, both parties have been electorally successful in the last years against the background of broader social transformations and conflicts generated due to the protracted crisis experienced in Southern Europe. In order to study the origins and evolution of these parties we link concepts and methodologies developed within two different fields of study—social movements and political parties- so as to understand the interaction between collective mobilizations and party system changes. Moreover, we attempt to explore aspects of convergence between the two cases so as to reflect on the relationship developed between parties and movements during crisis. Both parties acted as ‘movement parties’ for a short period of time revealing on the one hand the massive loss of trust in traditional parties and institutions in both countries, and on the other the fact that it was the ordinary citizens who became agents of protest and change in Southern Europe. Still, both Syriza and Podemos seem as adopting conventional party strategies and discourse losing, thus, their relation with grassroots mobilizations.

References

  1. Calvo, Kerman, and Iago Álvarez. 2015. Limitaciones y exclusiones en la institucionalización de la indignación: del 15-M a Podemos. Revista Española de Sociología 24:115–122.Google Scholar
  2. Errejón, Inigo. 2015. We the People. El 15-M: ¿Un Populismo Indignado? ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 14:124–156.Google Scholar
  3. Galindo, Jorge, et al. 2015. Podemos: La Cuadratura del Círculo. Madrid: Debate.Google Scholar
  4. Goffman, Ervin. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Harmel, Robert, and John D. Robertson. 1985. ‘Formation and success of new parties: A cross-national analysis’. International Political Science Review 6 (4): 501–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hirschmann, Albert O. 1991. The Rhetoric of reaction: Perversity, futility, jeopardy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kanellopoulos, Kostas, and Kostas Kostopoulos. 2013. Alliance building in the Greek anti-austerity campaign, 2010–12. Paper presented in ECPR general conference, Bordeaux, 3–7 September 2013. http://ecpr.eu/filestore/paperproposal/6e60f90c-c040-4312-82de-85cf4e03ce33.pdf.
  8. Karyotis, Georgios, and Wolfgang Rüdig. 2013. Beyond the usual suspects: New participants in anti-austerity protest in Greece. Mobilization: An International Journal 18:313–330.Google Scholar
  9. Karyotis, Giorgos, and Wolfgang Rüdig. 2014. Who protests in Greece? Mass opposition to austerity. British Journal of Political Science 44:487–513.Google Scholar
  10. Katsampekis, Giorgos. 2015. The rise of the Greek radical left to power: Notes on Syriza’s discourse and strategy. Linea Sur 9:152–161.Google Scholar
  11. Katsampekis, Giorgos, and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2014. Left-wing populism in the European periphery: The case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies 19:119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kitschelt, Herbert. 2006. ‘Movement parties’. In Handbook of Party Politics, eds. Richard Katz and William Crotty, 278–291. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Kousis, Maria. 2013. The Greek campaign against memoranda and austerity policies. Sociological Review 1:33–41.Google Scholar
  14. Martín, I. 2015. Podemos y otros modelos de partido-movimiento. Revista Española de Sociología 24:107–114.Google Scholar
  15. Martínez, Miguel A., and Elena D. San Juan. 2014. Social and political impacts of the 15M movement in Spain. http://www.miguelangelmartinez.net/IMG/pdf/M15_impacts_v3_0_April_2014.pdf.
  16. Panagyiotakis, Mihalis. 2015. The radical left in Greece. Socialism and Democracy 29:25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rendueles, César, and Jorge Sola. 2015. Podemos and the paradigm shift. Jacobin Magazine.Google Scholar
  18. Rivero, Jacobo. 2015. Podemos: Objetivo asaltar los cielos. Barcelona: Planeta.Google Scholar
  19. Roberts, Kenneth. 2015. Changing Course in Latin America: Party Systems in the Neoliberal Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Romanos, Eduardo and Igor Sádaba, I. 2015. From the street to parliament through the app: Digitally enabled political outcomes of the Spanish 15M movement. Paper presented at ESA RN 25 midterm conference 2015 Madrid, 19–20 February.Google Scholar
  21. Sampedro, Viktor, and Josep Lobera. 2014. The Spanish 15-M movement: A consensual dissent? Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14636204.2014.938466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stobart, Luke. 2014. Understanding Podemos (1/3): 15M and counter-politics. http://left-flank.org/2014/11/05/explaining-podemos-1-15-m-counter-politics/.
  23. Subirats, Joan. 2015. ¿Desbordar el ‘dentro’-‘fuera’? Revista Teknokultura 12:161–168.Google Scholar
  24. SYN. 2005. Central Political Committee Resolution. ‘Left and Youths: a Dynamic Relationship, a Relationship of Subversion’. Online at: http://www.syn.gr/gr/keimeno.php ?id=7225.
  25. Syriza. 2012. Electoral declaration. http://goo.gl/9gHXoM.
  26. Syriza. 2013. The statute of Syriza, the coalition of the radical left. http://www.syriza.gr/pdfs/katastatiko.pdf.
  27. Syriza. 2014. The Thessaloniki programme. http://goo.gl/1CLTbz.
  28. Teperoglou, Eftichia, and Emmanouil Tsatsanis. 2014. Dealignment, de-legitimation and the implosion of the two-party system in Greece: The earthquake election of 6th May 2012. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 24:222–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Triandafyllidou, Anna, Ruby Gropas, and Hara Kouki, Hrsg. 2013. European modernity and the Greek crisis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Tsipras, Alexis. 2011. Statement after the meeting between political leaders. http://goo.gl/BlFTma.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of DurhamDurhamUK
  2. 2.Political Science DepartmentBasque Country UniversityMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations