Advertisement

How Journalism Responds to Right-Wing Populist Criticism

The “Lying Press” Attack and the “No Censorship” or “No Ammunition” Defence
  • Benjamin KrämerEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Right-wing populists often criticise the established media for being untruthful or censoring what critics consider to be important information—for instance, the ethnic background of perpetrators—and for being biased against right-wing populist actors. That hostility towards journalism can be understood as a consequence of the right-wing populist worldview. Because such criticism uses professional norms of journalism against it and due to particular aspects of how journalism functions, it remains difficult for journalists to respond to such criticism. Certain responses risk confirming and even normalising the right-wing populist worldview.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abts, K., & Rummens, S. (2007). Populism versus democracy. Political Studies, 55, 405–424.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00657.x
  2. Aslanidis, P. (2015). Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies, 64, 88–104.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12224
  3. Aupers, S. (2012). ‘Trust no one’: Modernization, paranoia and conspiracy culture. European Journal of Communication, 27, 22–34.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323111433566
  4. Barkun, M. (2003). A culture of conspiracy: Apocalyptic visions in contemporary America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Boyd, D. (2017). Did media literacy backfire? Journal of Applied Youth Studies, 1(4), 83–89.Google Scholar
  6. Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47, 2–16.Google Scholar
  7. Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6, 442–464.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905056815
  8. Elchardus, M., & Spruyt, B. (2014). Populism, persistent republicanism and declinism: An empirical analysis of populism as a thin ideology. Government and Opposition. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2014.27
  9. Freeden, M. (1996). Ideologies and political theory. A conceptual approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Freeden, M. (1998). Is nationalism a distinct ideology? Political Studies, 46, 748–765.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00165
  11. Hearns-Branaman, J. O. (2014). Journalistic professionalism as indirect control and fetishistic disavowal. Journalism, 15, 21–36.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912474202
  12. Hofstadter, R. (1996). The paranoid style in American politics. In R. Hofstadter (Ed.), The paranoid style in American politics and other essays (pp. 3–40). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Iglesias, P. (2015). Understanding Podemos. New Left Review, 92, 7–22.Google Scholar
  14. Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46, 319–345.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
  15. Kemmers, R., van der Waal, J., & Aupers, S. (2016). Becoming politically discontented: Anti-establishment careers of Dutch nonvoters and PVV voters. Current Sociology, 64, 757-774.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392115609651 krämer, B. (2014). Media populism: A conceptual clarification and some theses on its effects. Communication Theory, 24, 42–60.  https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12029
  16. Krämer, Benjamin (2017a, in press). Populism, media, and the form of society. Communication Theory.Google Scholar
  17. Krämer, B. (2017b). Populist online practices: The function of the Internet in right-wing populism. Information, Communication & Society, 9, 1293–1309.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2017.1328520
  18. Luhmann, N. (1998). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft [The society of society]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  19. Mannheim, K. (1929). Ideologie und Utopie [Ideology and utopia]. Bonn, Germany: Cohen.Google Scholar
  20. Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39, 541–563.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
  21. Müller, J.-W. (2014). “The people must be extracted from within the people”: Reflections on populism. Constellations, 21, 483–493.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12126
  22. Oliver, J. E., & Rahn, W. M. (2016). Rise of the Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 election. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667, 189–206.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216662639
  23. Schudson, M. (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 2, 149–170.  https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490100200201
  24. Schudson, M., & Anderson, C. (2008). Objectivity, professionalism, and truth seeking in journalism. In K. Wahl–Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), Handbook of journalism studies (pp. 88–101). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Siri, J. (2015). Paradoxien konservativen Protests [Paradoxes of conservative protest]. In S. Hark & P.-I. Villa (Eds.), Anti-Genderismus: Sexualität und Geschlecht als Schauplätze aktueller politischer Auseinandersetzungen [Anti-genderism: Sexuality and gender as scenes of recent political conflicts] (pp. 239–255). Bielefeld, Germany: transcript.Google Scholar
  26. Stanley, B. (2008). The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13, 95–110.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310701822289
  27. Tuchman, G. (1978). Making the news: A study in the construction of reality. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication Studies and Media ResearchLMU MunichMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations