Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Blockchain-Technologie und Open-Source- Sensornetzwerke

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven zur Zukunft der Wertschöpfung

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Beitrag untersuchen wir die Mechanismen und Prozesse, die Open-Source-Sensornetzwerken zugrunde liegen. Wir zeigen Ineffizienzen aktueller Netzwerke auf und stellen anschaulich dar, wie Distributed-Ledger-Verfahren diese verringern können. Unser Forschungsansatz basiert auf Untersuchungen zu komplexen Systemen, der Transaktionskostentheorie sowie des Statuts der Offenheit in kommerzieller Wertschöpfung und Community-basierter Innovation. Wir analysieren Schlüsselmechanismen von Open-Source-Sensornetzwerken vor dem Hintergrund traditioneller Sensornetzwerke – explizit anhand des Fallbeispiels Safecast. Besonderes Augenmerk legen wir auf die Problematiken offener Sensornetzwerke hinsichtlich Sicherheit, Instandhaltung, Incentivierung, eines nachhaltigen Betriebs sowie strategischer Expansionen. Basierend auf Distributed-Ledger-Systemen wie Bitcoin erarbeiten wir Ansätze, die diesen Defiziten gezielt entgegenwirken. Zudem ermöglichen sie die Entwicklung von Technologien und komplexen Systemen auf offene, dezentralisierte und möglicherweise auch selbsterhaltende Art und Weise zu entwickeln.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Computer networks, 38(4), 393–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1969). The organization of economic activity: issues pertinent to the choice of market versus nonmarket allocation. The analysis and evaluation of public expenditure: the PPB system, 1, 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C. Y. & Hippel, E. A. von (2010). Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper, (10-038), 4764–09.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C. Y. & Clark, K. B. (2006). The architecture of participation: Does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open source development model? Management Science, 52(7), 1116–1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown et al. (2016). Safecast: successful citizen-science for radiation measurement and communication after Fukushima. Journal of Radiological Protection, 36, 82–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property. California Management Review, 45(3), 33–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, H. (2016, June 27). Hillary Clinton’s Initiative on Technology & Innovation. URL: www.hil-laryclinton.com/briefing/factsheets/2016/06/27/hillary-clintons-initiative-on-technology-innovation.

  • Dahlander, L. & Magnusson, M. G. (2008). How do firms make use of open source communities? Long range planning, 41(6), 629–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlander, L. & Magnusson, M. G. (2005). Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms. Research policy, 34(4), 481–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A. & Hobday, M. (2005). The business of projects: managing innovation in complex products and systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Majchrzak, A. (2011). Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organization science, 22(5), 1224–1239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hippel, E. von & Krogh, G. von (2003). Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization science, 14(2), 209–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. (1998). Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation. Research policy, 26(6), 689–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong, J. P. de & Hippel, E. von (2009). Transfers of user process innovations to process equipment producers: A study of Dutch high-tech firms. Research Policy, 38(7), 1181–1191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, B. (2016, June). Verknüpft - Blockchains für das Internet der Dinge. iX Magazin für professionelle Informationstechnologie, 2016(6), 54–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, J. (2013). Open source hardware. Technical Report, Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platzer, J. (2014). Bitcoin - kurz & gut. Cologne: O’Reilly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pureswaran, V., Panikkar, S., Nair, S., & Body, P. (2015). Empowering the edge - Practical insights on a decentralized Internet of Things. IBM Institute for Business Value, Executive Report. URL: www-935.ibm.com/services/multimedia/GBE03662USEN.pdf.

  • Raymond, E. (1999). The cathedral and the bazaar. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 12(3), 23–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubow, E. (2008). Open source hardware. UCSD Working Papers. URL: https://cseweb.ucsd.edu/clas-ses/fa08/cse237a/topicresearch/erubow_tr_report.pdf.

  • Seidel, M. D. L.& Stewart, K. J. (2011). An initial description of the C-form. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 33, 37–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tech, R. P. G., Ferdinand, J., & Dopfer, M. (2016). Open Source Hardware Startups and Their Communities. In J. Ferdinand, U. Petschow, S. Dickel (Hrsg.), The Decentralized and Networked Future of Value Creation. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • The TAPR Open Hardware License, Version 1.0(2007). URL: www.tapr.org/TAPR_Open_Hardware_License_v1.0.txt.

  • Thompson, C. (2011). Build it. Share it. Profit. Can open source hardware work? Work, 10, 08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, R., Moeller, S., Krishnamachari, B., & Rao, T. R. (2015). Trust–based backpressure routing in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Sensor Networks, 17(1), 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Zhang, Q., & Liu, J. (2007). The self-protection problem in wireless sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 3(4), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, J. & Lakhani, K. R. (2008). Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Industry and Innovation, 15(2), 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of economic literature, 38(3), 595–613.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Institut für Internet und Gesellschaft, Französische Straße 9, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland

    Robin P. G. Tech & Konstanze E. K. Neumann

  2. AtomLeap, Oranienstraße 183, 10999, Berlin, Deutschland

    Wendelin Michel

Authors
  1. Robin P. G. Tech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Konstanze E. K. Neumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wendelin Michel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin P. G. Tech .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Helmut-Schmidt-Universität , Hamburg, Germany

    Tobias Redlich

  2. Helmut-Schmidt-Universität , Hamburg, Germany

    Manuel Moritz

  3. Helmut-Schmidt-Universität , Hamburg, Germany

    Jens P. Wulfsberg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tech, R.P.G., Neumann, K.E.K., Michel, W. (2018). Blockchain-Technologie und Open-Source- Sensornetzwerke. In: Redlich, T., Moritz, M., Wulfsberg, J. (eds) Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven zur Zukunft der Wertschöpfung. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20265-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20265-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-20264-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-20265-1

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation