Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Open-Source-Projekte zwischen Passion und Kalkül

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven zur Zukunft der Wertschöpfung

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Aufsatz gibt einen systematisierenden Überblick über Open-Source-Communities und ihre sozioökonomischen Kontexte. Zunächst erfolgt eine Rekonstruktion der Ausdifferenzierung quelloffener Softwareprojekte. Daran anknüpfend werden vier idealtypische Varianten derzeitiger Open-Source-Projekte voneinander abgegrenzt. Anschließend wird aus technik- soziologischer Sicht diskutiert, weshalb quelloffene Softwareprojekte ihre Formatierung als Gegenentwurf zur kommerziellen Produktion inzwischen verloren haben, aber im Unterschied zu früheren Spielarten der kollektiven Invention überlebensfähig geblieben sind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Allen, R. (1983). Collective Invention. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 4(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alphabet Inc. (2016). Form 10-K 2015. Washington D.C.: United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. (2002). Coase’s Penguin, or, Linux and ‚The Nature of the Firm‘. Yale Law Journal, 112, 369–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. (2013). Practical Anarchism, Peer Mutualism, Market Power, and the Fallible State. Politics & Society, 41(2), 213–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons-based Peer Production and Virtue. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(4), 394–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, M., Ljungberg, J. & Rolandsson, B. (2012). Justifying the Value of Open Source. ECIS Proceedings. URL: http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2012/122/ (5/2017).

  • Bezroukov, N. (1999). A Second Look at the Cathedral and the Bazaar. First Monday, 4(12). URL: http://firstmonday.org/article/view/708/618 (5/2017).

  • Brooks, F. (1975). The Mythical Man-Month. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet, J. (2015). Development Activity in LibreOffice and OpenOffice. LWN.net (3/25/2015). https://lwn.net/Articles/637735/ (5/2017).

  • Corbet, J. & Kroah-Hartman, G. (2016). Linux Kernel Development Report. San Francisco: The Linux Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet, J., Kroah-Hartman, G., McPherson, A. (2009–2015). Linux Kernel Development Report. San Francisco: The Linux Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolata, U. & Schrape, J-F. (2016). Masses, Crowds, Communities, Movements: Collective Action in the Internet Age. Social Movement Studies, 15(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, M. (2014). Within the Enterprise, Open Source Must Coexist in a Hybrid IT Portfolio. Gartner Inc. Research Report. Stamford: Gartner Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F., McKie, J., Mancke, R. (1983). IBM and the US Data Processing Industry: An Economic History. Santa Barbara: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Free Software Foundation (1989). GNU General Public License (GPL) Version 1.0. URL: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-1.0.en.html (5/2017).

  • Gates, Bill (1976): An Open Letter to Hobbyists. In: Computer Notes 1(9), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsi, S. (1999). VA Linux Rockets 698%. In: CBS Marketwatch (12/10/1999). URL: http://www.cbs-news.com/news/va-linux-rockets-698/ (5/2017).

  • Greenstein, S. & Nagle, F. (2014). Digital Dark Matter and the Economic Contribution of Apache. Research Policy, 43(4), 623–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulley, N. & Lakhani, K. (2010). The Determinants of Individual Performance and Collective Value in Private-collective Software Innovation. Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Management Unit Working Paper 10/065.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, J., Schöberl, S. & Alexy, O. (2014). The Emergence of Openness: How and Why Firms Adopt Selective Revealing in Open Innovation. Research Policy, 43(5), 879–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolassa, C., Riehle, D., Riemer, P. & Schmidt, M. (2014). Paid vs. Volunteer Work in Open Source. Proceedings 47th Hawaii Int. Conference on System Sciences, 3286–3295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranich, N. & Schement, J. (2008). Information Commons. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42(1), 546–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiss, D., Finn, M. & Turner, F. (2011). The Limits of Peer Production: Some Reminders from Max Weber for the Network Society. New Media & Society, 13(2), 243–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakhani, K. & Hippel, E. v. (2003): How Open Source Software Works. Research Policy, 32, 923–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. (2012). The Architecture of Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. & Tirole, J. (2002). Some Simple Economics of Open Source. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2), 197–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessig, L. (1999). CODE and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Microsoft Corp. (2015). Annual Report. http://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ (5/2017).

  • Moody, G. (2002). Rebel Code. The Inside Story of Linux and the Open Source Revolution. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netscape Communications (1998). Netscape Announces Mozilla.org. Press Release (2/23/1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, S. (2003). Guarding the Commons. How Community Managed Software Projects Protect their Work. Research Policy, 32, 1179–1198.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, S. & Ferraro, F. (2007). The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1079–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh, M. & Rota, S. (2007). Open Source Software Development: Just another Case of Collective Invention? Research Policy, 36, 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1991). A Society of Organizations. Theory & Society, 20, 725–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, E. (1998). Goodbye, „free software“; Hello, „open source“. Announcement (11/22/1998). URL: http://www.lab.unb.br/pub/computing/museum/esr/open-source.html (5/2017).

  • Raymond, E. (1999). The Cathedral and the Bazaar. Sebastopol: O’Reilly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (2014). The Zero Marginal Cost Society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinellis, D. & Giannikas, V. (2012). Organizational Adoption of Open Source Software. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(3), 666–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreeuwenberg, K. & Poell, T. (2012). Android and the Political Economy of the Mobile Internet. First Monday, 17(7). http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i7.4050 (5/2017)

  • Stallman, R. (1983). New UNIX Implementation. URL: http://bit.ly/1DSDoXW (5/2017).

  • Torvalds, L. (2002). Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper Documentation from Linux Tree. Linux Kernel Mailinglist (4/20/2002). URL: http://www.lwn.net/2002/0425/a/ideology-sucks.php3 (5/2017).

  • Weber, S. (2000). The Political Economy of Open Source. BRIE Working Paper 140. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westenholz, Ann (Eds.) (2012). The Janus Face of Commercial Open Source Software Communities. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Universität Stuttgart, Keplerstraße 7, 70174, Stuttgart, Deutschland

    Jan-Felix Schrape

Authors
  1. Jan-Felix Schrape
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan-Felix Schrape .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Helmut-Schmidt-Universität , Hamburg, Germany

    Tobias Redlich

  2. Helmut-Schmidt-Universität , Hamburg, Germany

    Manuel Moritz

  3. Helmut-Schmidt-Universität , Hamburg, Germany

    Jens P. Wulfsberg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schrape, JF. (2018). Open-Source-Projekte zwischen Passion und Kalkül. In: Redlich, T., Moritz, M., Wulfsberg, J. (eds) Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven zur Zukunft der Wertschöpfung. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20265-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20265-1_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-20264-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-20265-1

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation