The Digital Turn in Higher Education Towards a Remix Culture and Collaborative Authorship

Chapter

Abstract

An ongoing process of media change is affecting and, increasingly, challenging all fields of society (Krotz, 2008). This change has been discussed as an epochal shift leading to a digital age (Hanson, 2014; Nordmann, Radder & Schiemann, 2014). The process in which the structure of media in society is redefined can be termed a `digital turn´. This digital turn is increasingly affecting academia: the university can be viewed as a space of digitalization. Universities propagate inventions which push the digitalization process. But science itself is changing in the course of digitalization. Thus the concept of `e-Science´ describes the increase in digital scientific research and the establishment of digitally based scholarly communications (Büffel, Pleil & Schmalz, 2007; Lang & Zobl, 2013; Heidkamp, 2014). Media change in the academic sector makes new demands on higher education. Higher education has to ensure that students acquire the academic media skills needed in a digital age. According to the goals of the Bologna Process, higher education must ensure students’ employability in the professional world of the digital age. But at the same time, the university is a space for critical reflection on the impact of digitalization. Following Derrida, one can envisage the university as a space of critical reflection and resistance (Derrida, 2002). From this perspective, the university is bound to discuss the shift in which digitalization re-defines the media landscape.

This heuristic consideration raises a crucial question: What does the term `digital turn’ mean in the context of higher education?

Keywords

Digital turn Higher education Remix culture Digital age Collaborative authorship 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bachmann-Medick, D. (2006). Cultural Turns. Neuorientierungen in den Kulturwissenschaften. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowolth.Google Scholar
  2. Barthes, R. (2008). The Death of the Author. In D. Lodge & N. Woog (Eds.), Modern Criticism and Theory. A Reader (pp. 313-316). London: Rutledge.Google Scholar
  3. Boyd, D. M. & Ellison, N.B. (2008). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1), 210-230.Google Scholar
  4. Büffel, S., Pleil, T., & Schmalz, J. S. (2007). Net-Wiki, PR-Wiki, KoWiki–Erfahrungen mit kollaborativer Wissensproduktion in Forschung und Lehre. Kommunikation@gesellschaft 8. URL: http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/12769/F2_2007_Bueffel_Pleil_Schmalz.pdf. Last accessed: 3. May 2017.
  5. Derrida, J. (2002). The future of the profession or the university without condition (thanks to the `Humanities,´ what could place tomorrow. In T. Cohen (Eds.), Jacques Derrida and the Humanities. A critical Reader (pp. 26-57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dommann, M. (2008). Papierstau und Informationsfluss. Die Normierung der Bibliothekskopie. Historische Anthropologie 16(1), 31–54Google Scholar
  7. Döring, J., & Thielmann, T. (Hrsg.) (2008). Spatial turn: das Raumparadigma in den Kulturund Sozialwissenschaften. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  8. Hanson, V. (2015). Zuspitzung. Die Auswirkungen der digitalen Medien auf die Wissenschaftspraxis. In A. Nordmann, H. Radder & G. Schiemann (Eds.), Strukturwandel der Wissenschaft. Positionen zum Epochenbruch (pp. 159-172). Weilerswist: Velbrück.Google Scholar
  9. Heidkamp, B. (2014). E-Science und forschendes Lernen. In O. Zawacki-Richter, D. Kergel, N. Kleinefeld, P. Muckel, J. Stöter & K. Brinkmann (Eds.), Teaching Trends 14. Offen für neue Wege: Digitale Medien in der Hochschule (pp. 51-69). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  10. Krotz, F. (2008). Kultureller und gesellschaftlicher Wandel im Kontext des Wandels von Medien und Kommunikation. In T. Thomas (Eds.), Medienkultur und soziales Handeln (pp. 43-62). Wiesbaden: VS Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lang, S., & Zobl, E. (2013). Über kollaborative Wissensproduktion und partizipative Lernprozesse zu zivilgesellschaftlicher Mitbestimmung. Das Lehrprojekt „I am a Cultural Producer“ und seine Relevanz für die Erwachsenenbildung. Magazin Erwachsenenbildung.at 19. URL: www.pedocs.de/zeitschriften.php?la=&zst=4208/2013/19#page=57-. Last accessed: 03. May 2017.
  13. Lessig, L. (2001). The Future of Ideas. The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. Creative Commons Version. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  14. Lessig, L. (2008). Remix, Making Art and Culture Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. Creative Commons Version. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  15. McLuhan. M. (1962/2011) The Gutenberg Galaxy. The Making of the Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronoto Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mitrou, L., Kandias, M., Stavrou, V., & Gritzalis, D. (2014). Social Media Profiling: A Panopticon or omnipoticon tool? URL: https://www.infosec.aueb.gr/Publications/2014-SSN-Privacy%20Social%20Media.pdf. Last accessed: 23 April 2017.
  17. Nordmann, A., Radder, H., & Schiemann, G. (Eds.) (2014). Strukturwandel der Wissenschaft. Positionen zum Epochenbruch. Weilerswist: Velbrück.Google Scholar
  18. Weel, A. van der (2011). Changing our textual Minds. Towards a digital Order of Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Habitussensitive Teaching and LearningHAWK HildesheimHildesheimGermany
  2. 2.E-Learning CentreRhine-Waal University of Applied SciencesKamp-LintfortGermany

Personalised recommendations