The Students’ Choice of Technology A pragmatic and outcome-focused Approach

Chapter

Abstract

While students are increasingly bringing informal practices of social media and other digital tools into an educational context, the students’ capabilities to use these to support their learning is debated. In educational technology research students are portrayed as digital experts, who are multitasking and using digital tools in new creative ways, but equally, they are reported to be uncritical users with a limited understanding of how to use technology to support learning.

In this chapter, I discuss the students’ choice of ICT tools for supporting their learning and their problem and project-based group work. Based on a study carried out on 5th-semester students in the programme Communication and Digital Media (CDM) at Aalborg University (AAU), I analyse the students’ motives and rationales for employing various tools. The study shows that students mainly choose mainstream commercial ICT tools e.g. Facebook, Google services and Dropbox, which are familiar to them and easy to use. I argue that the students’ approach to choosing technology is a pragmatic and outcome-focused approach. The students’ pragmatic approach to technology doesn’t fit into either the positive nor the more negative portraits of students’ use of technology. I argue that this pragmatic approach makes it (even more) important to study students’ self-directed use as to understand their digital practices; to give the students a better understanding of their own practice; and provide us as educators with the ability to challenge their use.

Keywords

Networked Learning Problem Based Learning Students’ use of Social Media ICT Facebook 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaen, J., & Dalsgaard, C. (2016). Student Facebook groups as a third space: between social life and schoolwork. Learning, Media and Technology 41(1), 160-186.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the “digital natives” debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26(5). doi:  10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x.
  3. Dalsgaard, C. (2014). Students’ use of Facebook for peer-to-peer learning. In S. Bayne, C. Jones, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg & C. Sinclair (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Networked Learning 2014 (pp. 95–102). Edinburgh University.Google Scholar
  4. Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2013). From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students’ motivation and experiences in online communities. Computers & Education 68. doi:  10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.028.
  5. Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2015). Exploring university students’ use of technologies beyond the formal learning context : A tale of two online platforms. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 31(3), 313–327.Google Scholar
  6. Friesen, N., & Lowe, S. (2012). The questionable promise of social media for education: Connective learning and the commercial imperative. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 28(3), 183–194. doi:  10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00426.x.
  7. Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology 41(1). doi:  10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954.
  8. Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., Finger, G., & Aston, R. (2015). Students’ everyday engagement with digital technology in university: exploring patterns of use and “usefulness.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 37(3), 1-12. doi:  10.1080/1360080X.2015.1034424.
  9. Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2015). What works and why? Student perceptions of “useful” digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education 1–13. doi:  10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946.
  10. Holgaard, J. E., Ryberg, T., Stegeager, N., Stentoft, D., & Thomassen (2014). PBL – Problembaseret læring og projektarbejde ved de videregående uddannelser. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  11. Khalid, M. S., Rongbutsri, N., & Buus, L. (2012). Facilitating Adoption of Web Tools for Problem and Project Based Learning Activities (pp. 559-566). URL: http://vbn.aau.dk/ws/files/62455944/Facilitating_Adoption_In_PBL_Activities.pdf. Last accessed: 06 April 2017.
  12. Kirschner, P. A. (2015). Facebook as learning platform: Argumentation superhighway or dead-end street? Computers in Human Behavior 53, 621–625. doi:  10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.011.
  13. Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237–1245. doi:  10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024.
  14. Kolmos, A., Fink, F. K., & Krogh, L. (2004). The Aalborg model – Problem-based and project-organized learning. In A. Kolmos, F. K. Fink & L. Krogh (Eds.), The Aalborg model: progress, diversity and challenges (pp. 9–18). Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  15. Konnerup, U., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2016). Future Workshop as a Pedagogical Framework for Doing Problem Based Learning. A. M. Notrvig et al. (Eds.), Designs for Learning, 5th International Conference Designing New Ecologies (pp. 128-147). Aaalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  16. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: “It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work.” Learning, Media and Technology 34(2), 141. URL: http://search.proquest.com/docview/214095237?accountid=8144. Last accessed: 04 April 2017.
  18. Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2013). Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 29(6). doi:  10.1111/jcal.12007.
  19. Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers and Education 56(2), 429-440. doi:  10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004.
  20. Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers and Education 55(2). doi:  10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.008.
  21. Rasiah, R. R. (2014). Transformative Higher Education Teaching and Learning: Using Social Media in a Team-based Learning Environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 123, 369–379. doi:  10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1435.
  22. Rongbutsri, N., Khalid, M. S., & Ryberg, T. (2011). ICT support for students’ collaboration in problem and project based learning. In J. Davies, E. de Graaf & A. Kolmos (Eds.), PBL across the disciplines (pp. 351–363). Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag. Aalborg Universitetsforlag. URL: http://vbn.aau.dk/da/publications/ict-support-for-studentscollaboration-in-problem-and-project-based-learning%28065d1e63-064d-49b2-9b3d-57ece3b5ae5d%29.html. Last accessed: 06 April 2017.
  23. Ryberg, T., Davidsen, J., & Hodgson, V. (2016). Problem and project based learning in mixed spaces: Nomads and artisans. In S. Cranmer, N. B. Dohn, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg & J. A Sime (Eds.), Networked Learning 2016 Conference Proceedings (pp. 200-209). Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
  24. Ryberg, T., & Larsen, M. C. (2012). Tales From the Lands of Digital Natives – A Journey to Neverland. In V. Hodgson et al. (Eds.), The Eight International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 543-550). Maastrich: Networked Learning.Google Scholar
  25. Selwyn, N. (2014). Distrusting educational technology: Critical questions for changing times. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Souleles, N. (2012). Perceptions of undergraduate Graphic Design students on the educational potential of Facebook. Research in Learning Technology 20(3), 241. URL: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1076525010?accountid=8144. Last accessed: 24. May 2017.
  27. Tolsby, H. (2009). Virtual environment for project based collaborative learning. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, C. Jones & B. Lindström (Eds.), Analysing networked learning practices in higher education and continuing professional development (pp. 241–258). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Vivian, R. (2011). University Students’ Informal Learning Practices Using Facebook: Help or Hindrance? In R. Kwan, C. McNaught, P. Tsang, F. Wang & K. Li (Eds.), Enhancing Learning Through Technology. Education Unplugged: Mobile Technologies and Web 2.0 (pp. 254-267). VS Springer: Heidelberg. doi:  10.1007/978-3-642-22383-9_21.
  29. Vivian, R., Barnes, A., Geer, R., & Wood, D. (2014). The academic journey of university students on Facebook: an analysis of informal academic-related activity over a semester. Research in Learning Technology 22. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v22.24681.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication & PsychologyAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations