Self-determined Learning (Heutagogy) and Digital Media Creating integrated Educational Environments for Developing Lifelong Learning Skills

  • Lisa Marie Blaschke


Defined as the study of self-determined learning, heutagogy is a learner-centered educational theory founded on the key principles of learner agency, self-efficacy, capability, and metacognition (knowing how to learn) and reflection. Combined with today’s technologies, the theory provides a framework for designing and developing learner-centered environments that have the potential to equip learners with the necessary skills for a lifetime of learning. In addition, application of heutagogy has been to shown to promote themes of both social responsibility and justice, as well as a more democratic educational process. This chapter outlines the fundamental principles of heutagogy, or self-determined learning, and describes ways in which the theory can be applied, taking into consideration the critical and changing roles played by the student, teacher, and institution in creating a holistic, self-determined learning environment. In addition, the chapter also identifies technologies – in particular social media – that can be used to support development of self-determined learning.


Heutagogy Self-determined learning Social media Lifelong learning Self-directed learning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adam Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall Giesinger, C., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition. Austin: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
  2. Anders, A. (2015). Theories and applications of massive online open courses (MOOCs): The case for hybrid design. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 16(6), 39-61.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, T. (2010). Theories for learning with emerging technologies. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press. URL: Last accessed: 04 April 2017
  4. Andrews, J. (2014). From obstacle to opportunity: Using government-mandated curriculm change as a springboard for changes in learning and teaching. In L. M. Blaschke, C. Kenyon, & S. Hase, Experiences in self-determined learning (pp. 171-186). USA:
  5. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychology 28(2), 117-148.Google Scholar
  7. Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 13(1), 56-71. URL: Last accessed: 3 April 2017.
  8. Blaschke, L. M. (2013). E-learning and self-determined learning skills. In S. Hase & C. Kenyon, (Eds.), Self-determined learning: Heutagogy in action (pp. 55-68). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  9. Blaschke, L. M. (2014a). Moving forward in the PAH continuum: Maximizing the power of the social web. In L. M. Blaschke, C. Kenyon, & S. Hase (Eds.). Experiences in self-determined learning (pp. 49-62). USA:
  10. Blaschke, L. M. (2014b). Using social media to engage and develop online learners in selfdetermined learning. Research in Learning Technology. URL: Last accessed: 03 April 2017.
  11. Blaschke, L. M. (2016). Self-determined learning: Designing for heutagogic learning environments. In J. Elen, & G. Clarebout (Eds.), Learning, Design, and Technology. An International Compendium of Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy (pp. 25-40). Heidelberg: VS Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Blaschke, L., & Brindley, J. (2011). Establishing a foundation for reflective practice: A case study of learning journal use. European Journal of Open, Distance, and E-Learning. URL: Last accessed: 06 April 2017.
  13. Blaschke, L. M. & Brindley, J. (2015). Using social media in the online classroom. In M. Ally & B. Khan (Eds.), The international handbook of e-learning (volume 2): Implementation and case studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2015). Heutagogy: A holistic framework for creating 21st century self-determined learners. In M. M. Kinshuk & B. Gros (Eds.), The future of ubiquitous learning: Learning designs for emerging pedagogies (pp. 25-40). Heidelberg: VS Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Brandt, B. (2013). The learner’s perspective. In S. Hase, & C. Kenyon (Eds.), Self-determined learning: Heutagogy in action (pp. 99-116). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  16. Chawinga, W. D. (2017). Taking social media to a university classroom: Teaching and learning using Twitter and blogs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 14(3). doi:  10.1186/s41239-017-0041-6.
  17. Cochrane, T., Antonczak, L., Keegan, H., & Narayan, V. (2014). Riding the wave of BYOD: Developing a framework for creative pedagogies. Research in Learning Technologies 22. doi:  10.3402/rlt.v22.24637.
  18. Cochrane, T., & Bateman, R. (2010). Smartphones give you wings: Pedagogical affordances of mobile web 2.0. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 26(1), 1-14.Google Scholar
  19. Conole, G. (2012). Designing for learning in an open world: Explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems and performance technologies. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). The handbook of self-determination research. Rochester: The University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  21. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House. Frey, S. (2016). Putting students in charge of their learning transforms a small rural district. EdSource: Highlighting Strategies for Student Success. URL: Last accessed: 06 April 2017.
  22. Garnett, F. (2013). The PAH continuum: Pedagogy, andragogy, and heutagogy. (Blog post). Heutagogy Community of Practice. URL: Last accessed: 06 April 2017.
  23. Gerstein, J. (2013). Education 3.0 and the pedagogy (andragogy, heutagogy) of mobile learning. (Blog post). User generated education. URL Last Accessed: 06 April 2017.
  24. Glisczinski, D. J. (2010). Sustainability in the synapses: Neuroplasticity and transformative learning. In P. Cranton, E. Taylor & J. Tyler (Eds.), Eight International Transformative Learning Conference Peer Reviewed Proceedings. URL:
  25. Glisczinski/Glisczinski(2010)SustainSynapses.pdf. Last accessed: 06 April 2017.Google Scholar
  26. Halupa, C. (2017). Reaching ‘creating’ in Bloom’s taxonomy: The merging of heutagogy and technology in online learning. In C. Zhou (Ed.), Handbook of research on creative problem-solving skill development in higher education (pp. 429-449). USA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  27. Hase, S. (2013). Providing a compass: Neuroscience & heutagogy. (Blog post). Heutagogy Community of Practice. URL: Last accessed: 06 April 2017.
  28. Hase, S. (2016). Self-determined learning (heutagogy): Where have we come since 2000? Special Edition of Southern Institute of Technology Journal of Applied Research. URL: from: Last accessed: 06 April 2017.
  29. Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2001). From andragogy to heutagogy. Ultibase articles 5(3), 1-10.Google Scholar
  30. Hase, S. & Kenyon, C. (2007). Heutagogy: A child of complexity theory. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education 4(1), 111-119.Google Scholar
  31. Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2016). Shifting from pedagogy to heutagogy in education. (Blog post.) URL: Last accessed: 06 April 2017.
  32. Hexom, D. (2014). Heutagogy and the impact on adult learning in higher education. In L. M. Blaschke, C. Kenyon & S. Hase (Eds.), Experiences in self-determined learning (pp. 137-148). USA: Scholar
  33. Hicks, A., & Sinkinson, C. (2015). Critical connections: Personal learning environments and information literacy. Research in Learning Technology 23. doi:
  34. Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge Adult Education.Google Scholar
  35. Kools, M., & L. Stoll (2016). What Makes a School a Learning Organisation? OECD Education Working Papers No. 137. doi:  10.1787/5jlwm62b3bvh-en.
  36. Luckin, R., Clark, W., Garnett, F., Whitworth, A., Akass, J., & Cook, J. (2010). Learnergenerated contexts: A framework to support the effective use of technology for learning. In M. Lee & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp. 70-84). Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  37. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50, 370-396.Google Scholar
  38. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007 (pp. 664-675). URL: Last accessed: 06 April 2017.
  39. Mezirow, J., & et al. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Nkuyubwatsi, B. (2016). Activating and nurturing the investment of heutagogical resources for equity and quality in self-determine open online and distance learning. Commonwealth of Learning. URL: Last accessed: 06 April 2017.
  41. Oliver, E. (2016). A move towards heutagogy to empower theology students. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 72(1). doi:  10.4102/hts.v72i1.3394.
  42. Price, D. (2014). Heutagogy and social communities of practice: Will self-determined learning rewrite the script for educators? In L. M. Blaschke, C. Kenyon, & S. Hase (Eds.), Experiences in self-determined learning (pp. 111-118). USA: Scholar
  43. Sani, R. (2017). Tertiary education redesigned. New Straits Times: Malaysia General Business sports and Lifestyle News. URL: Last accessed: 06 April 2017.
  44. Sharpe, R., Beetham, H., & de Freitas, S. (2010). Rethinking learning for a digital age: How learners are shaping their own experiences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Schnellert, L., & Butler, D. L. (2016). Teachers and self-and co-regulating learners. Psychology Today. URL: Last accessed: 06 April 2017.
  46. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  47. Stephenson, J., & Weil, S. (1992). Quality in learning: A capability approach in higher education. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  48. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. World Economic Forum (2016). New vision for education: Fostering social and emotional learning through technology. URL: Last accessed: 06 April 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.C3L – Center für lebenslanges LernenCarl von Ossietzky Universität OldenburgOldenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations