Skip to main content

Europäische Ordnung und Neue Staatsräson

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1909 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg ist in Europa eine internationale Ordnung entstanden, die sich durch ein außergewöhnlich hohes Maß an supranationaler Integration auszeichnet. Sie erstreckt sich auf eine große Bandbreite von Politikfeldern und verleiht der Europäischen Union (EU) in einigen von ihnen exklusive Zuständigkeiten. Supranationale Organe – die Europäische Kommission, das Europäische Parlament, der Europäische Gerichtshof und die Europäische Zentralbank – verfügen über eigenständige Entscheidungs- und Vetorechte gegenüber den Regierungen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Bickerton, Christopher, Dermot Hudson, und Uwe Puetter. 2015. The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era. Journal of Common Market Studies 53 (4): 703–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert. 1999: Can International Organizations be Democratic? In Democracy’s Edges, Hrsg. Ian Shapiro und Casiano Hacker-Cordon, 19–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debomy, Daniel. 2013. EU no, Euro yes? European Public Opinions Facing the Crisis (2007–2012). Paris: Notre Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Føllesdal, Andreas, und Simon Hix. 2006. Why there is a Democratic Deficit in the European Union: a Response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (3): 533–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieco, Joseph. 1996. State Interests and International Rule Trajectories: A Neorealist Interpretation of the Maastricht Treaty and European Economic and Monetary Union. Security Studies 5 (3): 261–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, Sara B. 2015. Public Attitudes towards the Euro Crisis. In Democratic Politics in a European Union under Stress, Hrsg. Olaf Cramme und Sara Hobolt, 48–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, Liesbet, und Gary Marks. 2009. A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, Markus, und Beate Kohler-Koch. 1996. Regieren im dynamischen Mehrebenensystem. In Europäische Integration, Hrsg. Markus Jachtenfuchs und Beate Kohler-Koch, 15–44. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Erik, Daniel Kelemen, und Sophie Meunier. 2016. Failing Forward? The Euro Crisis and the Incomplete Nature of European Integration. Comparative Political Studies 49 (7): 1010–1034.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier, und Timotheos Frey. 2006. Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared. European Journal of Political Research 45 (6): 921–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuffen, Dirk, Berthold Rittberger, und Frank Schimmelfennig. 2013. Differentiated Integration. Explaining Variation in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundestad, Geir. 1997. ‘Empire’ by Integration: The United States and European Integration, 1945–1997. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, Giandomenico. 1996. Regulating Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattli, Walter. 1999. The Logic of Regional Integration. Europe and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milward, Alan S. 1994. The European Rescue of the Nation State. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies 31 (4): 473–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew. 1994. Why the European Union Strengthens the State: Domestic Politics and International Cooperation. CES Working Paper 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 1996. The Path to European Integration: A Historical-Institutionalist Perspective. Comparative Political Studies 29 (2): 123–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puchala, Donald J. 1971. Of Blind Men, Elephants, and International Integration, Journal of Common Market Studies 10 (3): 267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puetter, Uwe. 2015. Deliberativer Intergouvernementalismus und institutioneller Wandel: die Europäische Union nach der Eurokrise. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 56 (3): 406–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42 (3): 427–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauh, Christian, und Michael Zürn. 2014. Zur Politisierung der EU in der Krise. In Krise der europäischen Vergesellschaftung? Soziologische Perspektiven, Hrsg. Martin Heidenreich, 121–145. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, Thomas. 2010. A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, Berthold. 2005. Building Europe’s Parliament. Democratic Representation Beyond the Nation-State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, Berthold, und Frank Schimmelfennig. 2006. Explaining the Constitutionalization of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (8): 1148–1167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, Dani. 2011. The Globalization Paradox and the Future of the World Economy. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosato, Sebastian. 2011. Europe United. Power Politics and the Making of the European Community. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2010. The Normative Origins of Democracy in the European Union: Towards a Transformationalist Theory of Democratization. European Political Science Review 2 (2): 211–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2014. European Integration in the Euro Crisis: the Limits of Postfunctionalism, Journal of European Integration 36 (3): 317–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2015. Liberal Intergovernmentalism and the Euro Area Crisis. Journal of European Public Policy 22 (2): 177–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone Sweet, Alec, und Wayne Sandholtz. 1997. European Integration and Supranational Governance. Journal of European Public Policy 4 (3): 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straubhaar, Thomas. 2011. Drei Euro-Zukunftsszenarien. Die Volkswirtschaft 84 (11): 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, William. 1983. Less than a Federation, More than a Regime: The Community as a Political System. In Policy-Making in the European Community, Hrsg. Helen Wallace, William Wallace und Carole Webb, 403–436. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winzen, Thomas. 2017. Constitutional Preferences and Parliamentary Reform. Explaining National Parliaments’ Adaptation to European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Klaus Dieter. 1999. The New Raison d’État as a Problem for Democracy in World Society. European Journal of International Relations 5 (3): 333–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Klaus Dieter. 2000. Die Neue Staatsräson – Zwischenstaatliche Kooperation als Demokratieproblem in der Weltgesellschaft. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, Michael. 1998. Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaats. Globalisierung und Denationalisierung als Chance. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Schimmelfennig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schimmelfennig, F. (2018). Europäische Ordnung und Neue Staatsräson. In: Albert, M., Deitelhoff, N., Hellmann, G. (eds) Ordnung und Regieren in der Weltgesellschaft. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19780-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19780-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-19779-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-19780-3

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics