Skip to main content

Positive Learning in the Age of Information (PLATO) – Critical Remarks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Positive Learning in the Age of Information

Abstract

Access to information in mass and social media was once thought of as a universal “leveler” for all. Unfortunately learning opportunities have been corrupted by biased, false, deliberately inaccurate, and unverified information. Negative learning (NL) occurs when Internet users are unable to recognize this. Positive learning (PL), the acquisition of new, warranted and morally justified knowledge, is PLATO’s focus. PLATO should capitalize on high fidelity simulations to: (a) study NL and PL, (b) teach PL skills, and (c) assess PL skills. A model of teaching and learning developed for “Pluraliteracies” provides a framework for PLATO to develop, teach and assess PL competencies. Two warnings as PLATO progresses: (1) education alone cannot overcome NL opportunities; technologies (e.g., artificial intelligence) are needed to assist citizens in identifying NL environments; and (2) research must go beyond “person” to “person-in-context” recognizing that environments can foster either NL or PL.

This paper is based on my discussant remarks at the June 2017 PLATO conference at the University of Mainz, Germany; for more information about the PLATO program see Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia et al. (2017).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Barnes, M. E., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). Practices and perspectives of college instructors on addressing religious beliefs when teaching evolution. CBE Life Science Education, 15, Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4909340/. Accessed: 8 July 2017.

  • Bloom, P., & Weisberg, D. S. (2007). Childhood origins of adult resistance to science. Science, 316, 996–997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological review, 100(3), 363–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokayem, H., & Boujaoude, S. B. (2008). College students’ perceptions of the theory of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 395–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, S., Ortega, T., Breakstone, J., & Wineburg, S. (2017). The challenge that’s bigger than fake news: Teaching students to engage in civic online reasoning. American Educator.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, S., & Wineburg, S. (2017, April). Taking Bearing: Reading less and learning more when assessing digital information. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Antonio, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J. (1968). Lunar gravity stimulation and its effect on man’s performance. Human Factors, 10(4), 393–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J. (2010). Measuring college learning responsibly: Accountability in a new era. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J., & Seminara, J. L. (1968). Effect of lunar gravity on man’s performance of basic maintenance tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford History Education Group (2016). From history assessments to assessments of news literacy. Retrieved from https://ed.stanford.edu/news/stanford-researchers-find-students-have-trouble-judging-credibility-information-online. Accessed: 15 June 2017.

  • Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia et al. (2017). Positive Learning in the Age of Information. Unpublished Manuscript, Draft Proposal Cluster of Excellence, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard J. Shavelson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shavelson, R.J. (2018). Positive Learning in the Age of Information (PLATO) – Critical Remarks. In: Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Wittum, G., Dengel, A. (eds) Positive Learning in the Age of Information. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19567-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19567-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-19566-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-19567-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics