Zusammenfassung
Fixed effects regressions are commonly used by social scientists to identify causality. However, several criticisms against the fixed effects estimator emerged in recent years. In addition to confounding factors that are associated with time variant covariates, fixed effects can lead to an improper aggregation of heterogeneous effects. In the present chapter, we discuss the problem that pertains to the fixed effect estimator and show techniques that do not suffer from this source of bias. We also illustrate the problem with empirical analysis of Chilean students for the period time from 2007 to 2013. On the basis of the theoretical framework developed in the chapter and empirical findings, we suggest some implications for research in social sciences.
Luis Maldonado acknowledges support provided by FONDECYT REGULAR 1160921 and Centro Nacional de Investigación para la Gestion Integrada de Desastres Naturales (CIGIDEN). We thank Marco Giesselmann for helpful comments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Andreß, Hans-Jürgen, K. Golsch, and A.W. Schmidt, A. W. 2013. Applied panel data analysis for economic and social surveys. Springer Science & Business Media.
Angrist, Josh D., and J.-S. Pischke. 2008. Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
Aronow, P. M., and C. Samii. 2013. Estimating average causal effects under interference between units. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1305.6156.
Aronow, P. M., and C. Samii. 2016. Does Regression Produce Representative Estimates of Causal Effects? American Journal of Political Science 60(1): 250-267.
Blackwell, M. 2013. A framework for dynamic causal inference in political science. American Journal of Political Science 57(2): 504-520.
Geraldo, P. 2015. El rol de la ensenanza media tecnico profesional en la reproduccion de la desigualdad educativa. Un estudio cuasi-experimental basado en el modelo de efectos primarios y secundarios del origen social. (Tesis de Magister). Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago de Chile.
Gerber, Alan S., and D.P. Green. 2012. Field experiments: Design, analysis, and interpretation. WW Norton.
Hernan, Miguel A., and J.M. Robins. 2017. Causal inference. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81(396): 945-960.
Humphreys, M. 2009. Bounds on least squares estimates of causal effects in the presence of heterogeneous assignment probabilities. Manuscript, Columbia University.
Imbens, Guido W., and D.B. Rubin. 2015. Causal inference in statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. Cambridge University Press.
Larrañaga, O., G. Cabezas, and F. Dussaillant. 2013. Informe completo del Estudio de la Educacion Tecnico Profesional. Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo.
Lewis, D. (1974). Causation. The Journal of Philosophy 70(17): 556-567.
Middleton, J. A., M.A. Scott, R. Diakow, and J.L. Hill. 2016. Bias amplification and bias unmasking. Political Analysis 24(3): 307-323.
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maldonado, L., Geraldo, P. (2018). Fixed Effects Regression and Effect Heterogeneity. In: Giesselmann, M., Golsch, K., Lohmann, H., Schmidt-Catran, A. (eds) Lebensbedingungen in Deutschland in der Längsschnittperspektive. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19206-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19206-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-19205-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-19206-8
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)