Skip to main content

Nothing Beats Quality? The Influence of Consumer Testing Signs on the Evaluation of Print Ads

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Advertising Research VIII

Part of the book series: European Advertising Academy ((EAA))

  • 1462 Accesses

Abstract

In times of an ever increasing product and brand diversity, as well as an information overload, catching the consumer´s attention has become more important than ever. This study investigates the influence of additional consumer testing signs (e.g., Stiftung Warentest) on the effectiveness of print advertisements (measured by attitude toward the brand, attitude toward the ad, purchase intention).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkinson, L., Rosenthal, S. (2014), “Signaling the Green Sell: The Influence of Eco-Label Source, Argument Specificity, and Product Involvement on Consumer Trust”, in: Journal of Advertising, 43, 33-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, H. H., Heinrich, D., Samak, M. (2012), “Eine Einführung in das Konzept der Erlebniskommunikation”, in: Bauer, H. H., Heinrich, D.,Samak, M. (eds.): Erlebniskommunikation, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, H. H., Heinrich, D., Schäfer, D. B. (2011), “Bio-Siegel als Differenzierungsmerkmal für Herstellermarken und Handelsmarken - Eine experimentelle Untersuchung am Beispiel von Lebensmittelmarken”, in: Marketing ZFP 33(3): 192-207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltramini, R. F., Stafford, E. R. (1993), “Comprehension and perceived believability of seals of approval information in advertising”, in: Journal of Advertising, 22, 3-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, W., Kirmani, A. (1993), “A consumer-side experimental examination of signaling theory: do consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality?”, in: Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1): 111-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., Reutzel, C. R. (2011), “Signaling theory: A review and assessment”, in: Journal of Management, 37, 39-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, D. H., Biswas, A. (2001), “Third-Party Organization Endorsement of Products: An Advertising Cue Affecting Consumer Prepurchase Evaluation of Goods and Services”, in: Journal of Advertising, 30, 41-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisend, M. (2006), “Source Credibility in Marketing Communication: A Meta-Analysis”, in: Marketing – Journal for Research and Management, 2(1), 43-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esch, F.-R. (2014), “Strategie und Technik der Markenführung”, Vahlen, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esch, F.-R., Wicke, A., Rempel, J. E. (2005), “Herausforderungen und Aufgaben des Markenmanagements”, in: Esch, F.-R. (ed.) Moderne Markenführung, Gabler Verlag, Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faupel, U., Haselhoff, V., Ziesak, M., Holzmüller, H. H. (2014), “Social standing and quality labels–what influences parental decision-making?”, in: Young Consumers: Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers, 15, 68-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Focus-Media-Research, Ö. (2016), “Werbebilanz Jänner 2016” [Online], Wien. Available: http://www.focusmr.com/de/werbebilanz-122015/ Accessed 13.02.2016.

  • Gierl, H., Satzinger, M. (2000), “Die Nutzung extrinsischer und intrinsischer Qualitätssignale in Abhängigkeit vom Vorabwissen”, in: Jahrbuch der Absatz-und Verbrauchsforschung, 46, 261-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gierl, H., Stich, A. (1999), “Sicherheitswert und Vorhersagewert von Qualitätssignalen”, in: Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 51, 5-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gierl, H., Winkler, S. (2000), “Neue Gütezeichen als Qualitätssignale”, in: Marketing: Zeitschrift für Forschung und Praxis, 22, 197-207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haenraets, U., Ingwald, J., Haselhoff, V. (2012), “Gütezeichen und ihre Wirkungsbeziehungen – ein Literaturüberblick”, in: der markt, 51, 147-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildenbrand, A., Kühl, R., Piper, A. (2016), “On the Credibility Determinants of a Quality Label: a Quasi-Natural Experiment Using the Example of Stiftung Warentest”, in: Journal of Consumer Policy, 39, 307-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer, G., Hellwig, C. (2009), “Professionelles Vertriebsmanagement: Der prozessorientierte Ansatz aus Anbieter-und Beschaffersicht”, Publicis Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., Weiss, W. (1951), “The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness”, in: Public opinion quarterly, 15, 635-650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito, P. M. (1990), “Bonding and nonbonding signals of product quality”, in: Journal of Business, 63(1): 41-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973), “Attention and effort”, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirmani, A., Rao, A. R. (2000), “No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality”, in: Journal of Marketing, 64(2): 66-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber-Riel, W., Esch, F.-R. (2000), “Strategie und Technik der Werbung - verhaltenswissenschaftliche Ansätze”, Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber-Riel, W., Gröppel-Klein, A. (2013), “Konsumentenverhalten”, Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, A. (2000), “The limited capacity model of mediated message processing”, in: Journal of communication, 50, 46-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littich, M., Zimmermann, L. (2010), “Erlebniskommunikation - Vermittlung emotionalen Zusatznutzens”, in: Marketing Review St. Gallen, 27, 26-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moussa, S., Touzani, M. (2008), “The perceived credibility of quality labels: a scale validation with refinement”, in: International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32, 526-533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohanian, R. (1991), “The impact of celebrity spokespersons’ perceived image on consumers’ intention to purchase”, in: Journal of advertising research, 31, 46-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, T. L. (1975), “The Role of Seals and Certifications of Approval in Consumer Decision-Making”, in: Journal of Consumer Affairs, 9, 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sänger, J., Wascher, E. (2011), “The influence of extrinsic motivation on competition-based selection”, in: Behavioural brain research, 224, 58-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, H. (1991), “Herkunfts-und Gütezeichen im Kaufentscheidungsprozeß – die Conjointanalyse als Instrument der Bedeutungsmessung”, M & P, Verlag für Wissenschaft und Forschung, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, C., Held, D. (2012), “Wie Werbung wirkt - Erkenntnisse des Neuromarketing”, Haufe-Verlag, Freiburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiebel, W. (2005), “Qualitätssignale und Qualitätserwartungen aus der Sicht der Verbraucher”, in: Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Agrarökonomie, 15, 27-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger, G., Mayerhofer, W., Koppe, P., Gottwald, I. (1998), “Der Einfluss von Schlüsselreizen wie Marke, Preis und Qualitätszeichen auf die Markenwahl bei Lebensmitteln in Österreich - eine Anwendung des Conjoint Measurements”, in: Trommsdorff, V. (ed.) Jahrbuch der Handelsforschung 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger, G., Schrattenecker, G. (2012), “Werbung”, UTB Verlag, Konstanz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shon, J., Marshall, J., Musen, M. A. (2000), “The Impact of Displayed Awards on the Credibility and Retention of Web Site Information”, in: Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, 2000. American Medical Informatics Association, 794-798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Töpfer, A. (2007), “Betriebswirtschaftslehre: Anwendungs- und prozessorientierte Grundlagen”, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trommsdorff, V., Teichert, T. (2011), “Konsumentenverhalten”, Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, C., Telci, E. E., Bodur, M., Iscioglu, T. E. (2011)” “Source characteristics and advertising effectiveness The roles of message processing motivation and product category knowledge”, in: International Journal of Advertising, 30, 889-914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziniel, W. (2013), “Third Party Product Reviews and Consumer Behaviour”, Gabler Verlag, Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carina Havlicek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Havlicek, C., Marckhgott, E. (2017). Nothing Beats Quality? The Influence of Consumer Testing Signs on the Evaluation of Print Ads. In: Zabkar, V., Eisend, M. (eds) Advances in Advertising Research VIII. European Advertising Academy. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18731-6_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics