Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Nonprofit-Organisationen und Nachhaltigkeit pp 23–39Cite as

Ökosoziale Marktwirtschaft in repräsentativen Demokratien: Eine empirische Analyse der Zahlungsbereitschaft von EU-Bürgern für Umweltschutz

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 12k Accesses

Part of the book series: NPO-Management ((NPOM))

Zusammenfassung

Unter den Akteuren (Wähler, Politiker, Produzenten, traditionelle und grüne Interessensgruppen und der Bürokratie) in repräsentativen westlichen Demokratien besteht ein breiter Konsens darüber, dass ein Wandel hin zu einer ökosozialen Marktwirtschaft wesentlich für ein zukünftiges, nachhaltiges Wirtschaftswachstum ist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Beuermann, C. und Santarius, T. (2006): Ecological tax reform in Germany: handling two hot potatoes at the same time. Energy Policy 34, S. 917-929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brännlund, R. und Persson, L. (2010): Tax or no tax? Preferences for climate policy attributes. Working paper, Centre for Environmental and Resource Economics, Umeå University, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinch, J. und Dunne, L. (2006): Environmental tax reform: an assessment of social responses in Ireland. Energy Policy 34, S. 950-959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deroubaix, J.-F. und Leveque, F. (2004): The rise and fall of French Ecological Tax Reform: social acceptability versus political feasibility in the energy tax implementation process. Energy Policy 34, S. 940-949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresner, S., Dunne, L., Clinch, P. und Beuermann, C. (2006): Social and political responses to ecological tax reform in Europe: An introduction to the special issue. Energy Policy 34, S. 895-904.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009b): Europeans’ Attitudes towards Climate Change. Report Special Eurobarometer 313, European Commission: Brussels, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L. und Frey, B. (2002): Trust Breeds Trust: How Taxpayers are Treated. Economics of Governance 3, S. 87-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghalwash, T. (2005): Energy taxes as a signaling device: An empirical analysis of consumer preferences. Energy Policy 35, S. 29-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, D.J. und Glaister, S. (2005): Decomposing the determinants of road traffic demand. Applied Economics 37, S. 19-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halla, M., Schneider, F. und Wagner, A. (2008): Satisfaction with Democracy and Collective Action Problems: The Case of the Environment. Working Paper No. 0808, Department of Economics at the Johannes Kepler University: Linz, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchgässner, G. und Schneider, F. (2003): On the Political Economy of Environmental Policy. Public Choice 115, S. 369-396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klok, J., Larsen, A. Dahl, A. und Hansen, K. (2006): Ecological Tax Reform in Denmark: history and social acceptability. Energy Policy 34, S. 905-916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann, A. und Reichl, R. (2015): How Trust in Governments influences the Acceptance of Environmental Taxes. In: A. Kollmann, F. Schneider, J. Reichl (Hrsg.), Political Economy and Instruments of Environmental Politics. The MIT Press, S. 53-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann, A., Reichl, J. und Schneider, F. (2012): Who Is Willing to Pay for the Environment in the EU – an Empirical Analysis. EuroEconomica 31 (5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann, A. und Schneider, F. (2011): Why Does Environmental Policy in Representative Democracies Tend to Be Inadequate? A Preliminary Public Choice Analysis. Sustainability 2 (12), S. 3710-3734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, D.F. und Levine. R. (2003): How Much does the Far Future Matter? A Hierarchical Bayesian Analysis of the Public’s Willingness to Mitigate Ecological Impacts of Climate Change. Jornal of American Statistical Association 98, S. 533–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, S. und Driffill, L. (2008): How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy. Energy Policy 36, S. 4412-4418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. und Volkert, J. (1999): No chance for incentive oriented environmental policies in representative democracies? A public choice analysis. Ecological Economics 31, S. 123-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. und Weck-Hannemann, H. (2005): Why is Economic Theory Ignored in Environmental Policy Practice. Applied Research in Environmental Economics 31, S. 257-275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Bergh, J. C. (2009): Safe climate policy is affordable - 12 reasons. Climatic Change, DOI 10.1007/s10584-009-9719-7.

  • Welsch, H. (2006): Environment and happiness: Valuation of air pollution using life satisfaction data. Ecological Economics 58, S. 801-813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, H. (2009): Implications of happiness research for environmental economics. Ecological Economics 68, S. 2735-2742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wüstenhagen, R. und Bilharz, M. (2006): Green energy market development in Germany: effective public policy and emerging customer demand. Energy Policy 34, S. 1681-1696.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Linz, Österreich

    Prof. Dr. Dr. hc. mult. Friedrich Schneider, Andrea Kollmann & Johannes Reichl

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Dr. hc. mult. Friedrich Schneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Kollmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Johannes Reichl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Friedrich Schneider .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung, Betriebswirtschaftslehre des Agribusiness, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

    Ludwig Theuvsen

  2. Institut für Public und Nonprofit Management, Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Linz, Austria

    René Andeßner

  3. Universität Freiburg, Lehrstuhl für NPO-Management, Freiburg, Switzerland

    Markus Gmür

  4. Institut für Management Accounting, Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Linz, Austria

    Dorothea Greiling

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schneider, F., Kollmann, A., Reichl, J. (2017). Ökosoziale Marktwirtschaft in repräsentativen Demokratien: Eine empirische Analyse der Zahlungsbereitschaft von EU-Bürgern für Umweltschutz. In: Theuvsen, L., Andeßner, R., Gmür, M., Greiling, D. (eds) Nonprofit-Organisationen und Nachhaltigkeit. NPO-Management. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18706-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18706-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-18705-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-18706-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation