Skip to main content

Moving in together and marrying for the first time

A comparison between European countries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The New Diversity of Family Life in Europe
  • 342 Accesses

Abstract

Family life has changed. While the standardized life courses of men and women during the “Golden Thirties” has been replaced by a magnitude of different lifestyles, politicians struggle with the development of adequate reactions. Meanwhile lifestyles continue to diversify.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, M. (2004). ‘Child-free and unmarried: Changes in the life planning of young East German women’, Journal of Marriage and Family 66(5), pp. 1170–1179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billari, F. C. & Liefbroer, A. C. (2010). ‘Towards a new pattern of transition to adulthood?’, Advances in Life Course Research 15(2-3), pp. 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld, H.-P. & Klijzing, E. (2005a). Becoming an adult in uncertain times. A14-country comparison of the losers of globalization, in H.P. Blossfeld, E. Klijzing,

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Mills & K. Kurz (2005). (eds), ‘Globalization, Uncertainty and Youth in Society’, Routledge, London/New York, pp. 423–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld, H.-P. & Klijzing, E. (2005b). Globalization, Uncertainty and Youth in Society, Routledge, London/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann, M. C. & Kriesi, I. (2011). ‘Transition to Adulthood in Europe’, Annual Review of Sociology 37(1), pp. 481–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H. J. (1985). Life course dynamics: trajectories and transitions 1968-1980, Cornell University Press, New York et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D. & Becker, G. S. (1993), A Treatise on the Family. Vol. 22, Harvard University Press, Cambridge et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajnal, J. (1965), European marriage patterns in perspective, in D. V. Glass & D. E. C. Eversley, eds, ‘Population in History: Essays in Historical Demography’, Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, pp. 101–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiekel, N., Liefbroer, A. C. & Poortman, A. R. (2014), ‘Understanding Diversity in the Meaning of Cohabitation Across Europe’, European Journal of Population 30 (4), pp. 391–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacovou, M. (2002), ‘Regional Differences in the Transition to Adulthood’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 580 (1), pp. 40–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M. (2007), ‘Explaining cross-national differences in marriage, cohabitation, and divorce in Europe, 1990-2000’, Population Studies 61(3), pp. 243–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M. (2011), ‘The Influence of Men’s Income and Employment on Marriage and Cohabitation: Testing Oppenheimer’s Theory in Europe’, European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie 27(3), pp. 269–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konietzka, D. (2010), Die Kopplung des Auszugs aus dem Elternhaus mit anderen Übergängen im frühen Erwachsenenalter, in ‘Zeiten des Übergangs’, pp. 205–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreyenfeld, M. & Konietzka, D. (2008), Wandel der Geburten- und Familienentwicklung in West- und Ostdeutschland, in N. F. Schneider, (eds.)., ‘Lehrbuch Moderne Familiensoziologie: Theorien, Methoden, empirische Befunde’, UTB, chapter 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R. (2011), The Second Demographic Transition: A Conceptual Map for the Understanding of Late Modern Demographic Developments in Fertility and Family Formation, in J. Ehmer, J. Ehrhardt & M. Kohli, (eds.), ‘Historische Sozialforschung, Special Issue: Fertilität in der Geschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts: Trends, Theorien, Politik, Diskurse’, vol. 36 no edn, Zentrum für historische Sozialforschung, Köln, pp. 179–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liefbroer, A. C. & Billari, F. C. (2010), ‘Bringing norms back. A theoretical and empirical discussion of their importance for understanding demographic behaviour’, Population, Space and Place 16(4), pp. 287–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, W. (2013), ‘Culture, Religion, and Fertility: A Global View’, Genus 43(3), 15–35. Marini, M. M. (1984), ‘Age and Sequencing Norms in the Transition to Adulthood’, Social Forces 63(1), pp. 229–244. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2578867

  • Mulder, C., Clark, W. & Wagner, M. (2002), ‘A comparative analisy of leaving home in the United States, the Netherlands and the West Germany’, Demographic Research 7(17).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauck, B., Brüderl, J., Huinink, J. & Walper, S. (2014), ‘The German Family Panel (pairfam)’, GESIS Data Archive, Cologne ZA5678(Data file Version 5.0.0).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauck, B. & Lois, N. (2015), Forthcoming: Auszug aus dem Elternhaus in den Vereinigten Staaten, Taiwan und Deutschland, in J. Eckhard, I. Rapp & J. Stauder, (eds.), ‘Soziale Bedingungen der privaten Lebensführung’, Springer, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988), ‘A Theory of Marriage Timing’, American Journal of Sociology 94(3), 563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santarelli, E. & Cottone, F. (2009), ‘Leaving home, family support and intergenerational ties in Italy: Some regional differences’, Demographic Research 21, 1–22. URL: http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol21/1/

  • Sassler, S. & Miller, A. J. (2011), ‘Class Differences in Cohabitation Processes’, Family Relations 60(2), 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szoltysek, M. (2008), ‘Three Kinds of Preindustrial Household Formation Systems in Eastern Europe: Challenge to Spatial Patterns of the European Family’, The History of the Family 13(3), pp. 223–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G. & Xie, Y. (2007), Marriage and Cohabitation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Kaa, D. J. (1987), ‘Europe’s Second Demographic Transition.’, Population Bulletin 42(1), pp. 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiik, K. A. (2011), ‘Socioeconomic differentials in the transition to first cohabitation in Norway’, International Review of Sociology 21(3), pp. 533–548.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Elisabeth Fulda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fulda, B.E. (2017). Moving in together and marrying for the first time. In: Çitlak, B., Kurtenbach, S., Lueneburg, M., Zlatkova, M. (eds) The New Diversity of Family Life in Europe. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17857-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17857-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17856-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17857-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics