Abstract
In this article, we discuss the use of mobile phones among construction workers in Casablanca (Morocco) as a strategy for efficient mobility to deal with the precarious nature of their work. One of the most important characteristics of these workers is their geographical mobility. These workers have to cope with the fast completion of construction projects and the need to find other construction sites in order to avoid periods without work. The role of the mobile phone is crucial in order for them to stay informed about the latest job opportunities on construction sites. We explore mobile phones are used and the benefits of its use among these workers. The results show that mobile phones allow workers to stay up-to-date with job opportunities and information about the best pay available. Mobile phones make their mobility more efficient thanks to pooled information about the location of work sites. The concept of mobility is used to link spatial mobility competencies enabled by the mobile phone with the social mobility of these workers suffering job precarity.
Research focus: Precarity, Mobility, Informality, Social Networks.
Research focus: Sociology of Culture, Education and Social Mobility, Precarity and Urban Exclusion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arnold, D., & Bongiovi, J. R. (2013). Precarious, informalizing, and flexible work: Transforming concepts and understandings. American Behavioral Scientist 57 (3), 289–308.
Athukorala, P. C. (2006). International labour migration in East Asia: Trends, patterns and policy issues. Asian‐Pacific Economic Literature, 20(1), 18–39.
Bauman, Z. (1998). Tourists and vagabonds. globalization: the human consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bauman, Z. (2013). Liquid modernity. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Thousands Oaks: Sage.
Castel, R. (1991). De l’indigence à l’exclusion, la désaffiliation. Précarité du travail et vulnérabilité relationnelle. In J. Donzelot (Eds.) Face à l’exclusion. Le modèle français (p. 137–168) Paris: Esprit.
Castel, R. (2007). Au-delà du salariat ou en deçà de l’emploi? L’institutionnalisation du précariat. In S. Paugam (Ed.), Repenser la solidarité (pp. 415–433). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Castells, M. (2011). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society, and culture. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Cingolani, P. (2015). Que sais-je? La précarité. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern western world. Taylor & Francis.
Fernández, D. C., & Valencia, A. S. (2013). Outsourcing and the New Labor Precariousness in Latin America. Latin American Perspectives, 40(5), 14–26.
Ferro, A., Fullin, G., Fellini, I., & Hunger, U. (2004). The political economy of labour migration in the European construction sector. IMIS-Beiträge, 25, 179–200.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
Kaufmann, V., Bergman, M., & Joye, D. (2004). Motility: mobility as capital. International journal of urban and regional research, 28(4), 745–756.
Khalil, J., & Zouhairi, A. (2016). A propos de la notion de precarite. Sciences et actions sociales, 3(49), 1–11. http://www.sas-revue.org/index.php/25-n-3/dossiers-n-3/49-a-propos-de-la-notion-de-precarite. Accessed: 20 March 2016.
Krackhardt, D. (1992). The Strength of Strong Ties: The Importance of Philos in Organizations. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (p. 216–239). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3(1), 47–57.
Meliá, J. L., Mearns, K., Silva, S. A., & Lima, M. L. (2008). Safety climate responses and the perceived risk of accidents in the construction industry. Safety Science, 46(6), 949–958.
Neilson, B., & Rossiter, N. (2005). From precarity to precariousness and back again: labour, life and unstable networks. Fibreculture. Digital Media. Networks. Transdisciplinary Critique, Issue 5. URL: http://five.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-022-from-precarity-to-precariousness-and-back-again-labour-life-and-unstable-networks/. Accessed: 12. February 2017.
Paugam, S. (2007). Le salarié de la précarité: Les nouvelles formes de l’intégration professionnelle. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Ringen, K., Seegal, J., & England, A. (1995). Safety and health in the construction industry. Annual review of public health, 16(1), 165–188.
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (Eds.) (2006). Mobile technologies of the city. Routledge.
Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury.
Upadhya, C., & Vasavi, A. R. (2006). Work, Culture and Sociality in the Indian Information Technology (IT) Industry: A Sociological Study. Bangalore: National Institute of Advanced Studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zouhairi, A., Khalil, J. (2017). Dealing with Uncertainty: The Use of Mobile Phone Among Construction Workers. In: Heidkamp, B., Kergel, D. (eds) Precarity within the Digital Age. Prekarisierung und soziale Entkopplung – transdisziplinäre Studien. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17678-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17678-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17677-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17678-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)