Skip to main content

The Party Composition of Government in Western Democracies, 1950–2015

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Parties, Governments and Elites

Part of the book series: Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft ((VGPO))

Abstract

This chapter reviews major indicators of the party composition of governments in 21 advanced democratic nations from 1950 to 2015, discusses strength and weaknesses of the various measures, and portrays their estimates of the extent to which various families of parties have participated in government in this period. Using Social Democratic parties’ participation in office as an example, the analysis of longitudinal and cross-sectional data reveals major correlates and causes of the variations in the partisan complexion of governments in advanced democracies in the post-World War II period. The data analysis suggests that five variables account for a substantial proportion of the share of cabinet seats controlled by Social Democratic parties from 1950 to 2015: historical participation in government from the end of World War I until 1950, membership in the Nordic family of nations, cleavage systems which favour centre-left parties, the social democratic vote, and proportional representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Arndt, C. 2013. The Electoral Consequences of Third Way Welfare State Reforms. Social Democracy’s Transformation and its Political Costs. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyme, K. von. 1985. Political Parties in Western Democracies. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer, M. R. 2015. Skills and Inequality. Partisan Politics and the Political Economy of Education Reforms in Western Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. R. 1978. “The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis.” The American Political Science Review 72(4), 1243-1262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. R. 1984. Social Democracy, Corporatism, Labor Quiescence, and the Representation of Economic Interest in Advanced Capitalist Society. In Goldthorpe, J. H. (Ed.), Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, 143-178. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, F. G. 1982. The Impact of Parties on Public Expenditure. In Castles, F. G. (Ed.), The Impact of Parties. Politics and Policies in Democratic Capitalist States, 21-96. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, F. G. 1986. “Social Expenditure and the Political Right: A Methodological Note.” European Journal of Political Research 14(3), 669-676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, F. G. (Ed.). 1993. Families of Nations. Patterns of Public Policy in Western Democracies. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, F. G. 1998. Comparative Public Policy: Patterns of Post-War Transformation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, F. G., S. Leibfried, J. Lewis, H. Obinger, and C. Pierson (Eds.). 2010. The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C. 1998. European Political Facts 1900–1996. Basingstoke: MacMillan. (4th Edn.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, P. J., and C. R. Bondibene. 2012. “The International Experience of Minimum Wages in an Economic Downturn.” Economic Policy 27(1), 99-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. 1985. Politics Against Markets. The Social Democratic Road to Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “European Social Democracy. Rose Thou Art Sick.” The Economist, 419, No. 8983, April 2 2016, 20-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forschungsgruppe Wahlen 2016. Wahl in Baden-Württemberg. Eine Analyse der Landtagswahl vom 13. März 2016. Mannheim: Forschungsgruppe Wahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, T. 2009. Die Christdemokratie in Europa. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, E., and H. Kriesi. 2016. “The Electoral Consequences of the Financial and Economic Crisis in Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 55(2), 203-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, Jr., D. A. 1977. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy.” American Political Science Review 71(4), 1467-1487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, Jr., D. A. 1987a. The Political Economy of Industrial Democracies. Cambridge. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, Jr., D. A. 1987b. The American Political Economy. Macroeconomics and Electoral Politics in the United States. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D. A., Jr. 1992. “Partisan Theory After Fifteen Years.” European Journal of Political Economy 8(3), 361-373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D. A., Jr. 1994. “The Partisan Model of Macroeconomic Cycles: More Theory and Evidence for the United States.” Economic and Politics 6(1), 1-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, E., and J. D. Stephens (Eds.). 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Parties and Policies in Global Market. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, E., and J. D. Stephens. 2012. Democracy and the Left. Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, T., and D. Soskice. 2006. “Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why some Democracies Redistribute More than Others.” American Political Science Review 100(1), 165-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keman, H. 2013. Democratisation and Social Democracy. In Armingeon, K. (Ed.), Staatstätigkeiten, Parteien und Demokratie. Festschrift für Manfred G. Schmidt, 219-240. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., and T. S. Pappas (Eds.). 2015. European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. 1984. Democracies. Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems. A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. 1999. Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. 2012. Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, London: Yale University Press. (2nd Edn.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manow, P. 2008. Religion und Sozialstaat. Frankfurt a.M., New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, W. 1993. Ende der Sozialdemokratie? Frankfurt a.M., New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Rommel, F. 1993. Grüne Parteien in Westeuropa. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Rommel, F., and T. Poguntke (Eds.). 2002. Green Parties in National Governments. London: Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohlen, D. 2014. Wahlrecht und Parteiensystem. Opladen, Toronto: Barbara Budrich. (7th Edn.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. 1984. Do Parties Make a Difference? London: MacMillan. (2nd Edn.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassoon, D. 1996. One Hundred Years of Socialism. The West European Left in the Twentieth Century. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. 1987. Sozialdemokratische Krisenpolitik in Europa. Das ‘Modell Deutschland’ im Vergleich. Frankfurt a.M., New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. G. 1980. CDU und SPD an der Regierung. Ein Vergleich ihrer Politik in den Ländern. Frankfurt a.M., New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. G. 1982a. Wohlfahrtsstaatliche Politik unter bürgerlichen und sozialdemokratischen Regierungen. Ein internationaler Vergleich. Frankfurt a.M., New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. G. 1982b. The Role of the Parties in Shaping Macroeconomic Policy. In Castles, F. G. (Ed.), The Impact of Parties. Politics and Policies in Democratic Capitalist States, 97-176. London, Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. G. 1992. La composizione partitica dei governi nelle democrazie occidental. In Calise, M. (Ed.), Come Cambiano i Partiti, 169-186. Milano: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. G. 1996. “When Parties Matter: A Review of the Possibilities and Limits of Partisan Influence on Public Policy.” European Journal of Political Research 30(2), 155-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. G. 2001. Ursachen und Folgen wohlfahrtsstaatlicher Politik. Ein internationaler Vergleich. In Schmidt, M. G. (Ed.), Wohlfahrtsstaatliche Politik. Institutionen, politischer Prozess und Leistungsprofil, 33-53. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. G. 2010. Parties. In Castles, F. G., S. Leibfried, J. Lewis, H. Obinger, and C. Pierson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, 211-226. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. G. 2012. Political Parties and the Welfare State in Western and Post-Communist Democracies. In Keman, H., and F. Müller-Rommel (Eds.), Party Government in the New Europe, 137-162. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. G. 2015. Richard Rose, Do Parties Make a Difference? In Balla, S. J., M. Lodge, and E. C. Page (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Classics of Public Policy, 405-416. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuerwald, C. 2016. Die Sozialstruktur Deutschlands im internationalen Vergleich. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. (3rd Edn.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatter, A. 2009. “Lijphart Expanded: Three Dimensions of Democracy in Advanced OECD Countries?” European Political Science Review 1(1), 125-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, A. 1996. Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzelburger, G. 2015. Parteien. In Wenzelburger, G., and R. Zohlnhöfer (Eds.), Handbuch Policy-Forschung, 81-112. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohlnhöfer, R. 2013. Policy-Wandel in der Demokratie. Ansätze einer Theorie. In Armingeon, K. (Ed.), Staatstätigkeiten, Parteien und Demokratie. Festschrift für Manfred G. Schmidt, 377-388. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manfred G Schmidt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmidt, M.G. (2017). The Party Composition of Government in Western Democracies, 1950–2015. In: Harfst, P., Kubbe, I., Poguntke, T. (eds) Parties, Governments and Elites. Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17446-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics