Skip to main content

Problemlösungsdruck: Das Arbeitsumfeld

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Die Psychologie der organisationalen Innovation

Zusammenfassung

Das Arbeitsumfeld bestimmt das unmittelbare Klima, in dem Individuen miteinander interagieren, um den Prozess der Innovation voranzutreiben. Der Lösungsdruck ist das Bindeglied zwischen diesem Umfeld und dem Individuum. Sowohl sach- und prozessbezogene als auch zwischenmenschliche Faktoren im Arbeitsumfeld fördern bzw. bremsen innovatorische Prozesse und aktivieren bzw. deaktivieren die persönlichen Ressourcen für Innovation. Führungskräfte haben auf diese Faktoren direckten Einfluss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Abra, J. (1994). Collaboration in creative work: An initiative for investigation. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anita Borg Institute. (2014). Innovation by design: The case for investing in women. http://anitaborg.org heruntergeladen. Zugegriffen: 05. Dez. 2014.

  • Baer, M., Oldham, G. R., Jacobsohn, G. C., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2008). The personality composition of teams and creativity: The moderating role of team creative confidence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 255–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for „mini-c“ creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S., & Sosniak, L. A. (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J. (2002). Creativity and innovation: Men’s business or women’s work? Baltic Journal of Psychology, 3, 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2017). Innovation capacity, organisational culture and gender. European Journal of Innovation Management, 20, 493–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, W. R. (1999). Age and individual differences in artistic productivity: Trends within a sample of British novelists. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Hrsg.), The nature of creativity (S. 325–339). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dul, J., Ceylan, C., & Jaspers, F. (2011). Knowledge workers’ creativity and the role of the physical work environment. Human Resource Management, 50, 715–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2011). The great reset. New York: HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frängsmyr, T. (1997). Les Prix Nobel. The Nobel Prizes 1996. Stockholm: Nobel Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertner, J. (2012). The idea factory: Bell labs and the great age of American innovation. London: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, D. M. (1999). Conditions and settings/Environment. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Hrsg.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, S. 323–340). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations, (2. Aufl.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman-Blumen, J. (1996). Women in corporate leadership: Reviewing a decade’s research. Wellesley: Wellesley College Center for Research on Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litwin, G., & Stringer, R. (1968). Motivation and organizational climate. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathisen, G. E., & Einarsen, S. (2004). A review of instruments assessing creative and innovative environments within organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millward, L. J., & Freeman, H. (2002). Role expectations as constraints to innovation: The case of female managers. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D. (Hrsg.) (2011). Handbook of organizational creativity. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., & Moertl, P. (2003). Cases of social innovation: Lessons from two innovations in the 20th century. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 261–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B. (1999). Group creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Hrsg.), Encyclopedia of creativity (S. 779–784). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration: New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, S. (1989). Motivation von Laienautoren. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Fachbereich Psychologie, Universität Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puccio, G. J. (1999). Teams. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Hrsg.), Encyclopedia of creativity (S. 640–649). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E. (1994). Managerial sex typing: A persistent and pervasive barrier to women’s opportunities. In M. J. Davidson & R. J. Burke (Hrsg.), Women in management: Current research issues (S. 65–84). London: Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behaviour: A path model of innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. M., & Kaemmerer, W. F. (1978). Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 553–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, R., & Gero, J. S. (2003). Design and change: A model of situated creativity. In C. Bento, A. Cardosa & J. S. Gero (Hrsg.), Approaches to creativity in artificial intelligence and cognitive science (S. 25–34). Acapulco: IJCAI03.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treffinger, D. J. (1995). Creative problem solving: Overview and educational implications. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanGundy, A. B. (1984). Managing group creativity: A modular approach to problem solving. New York: American Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cropley, D.H., Cropley, A.J. (2018). Problemlösungsdruck: Das Arbeitsumfeld. In: Die Psychologie der organisationalen Innovation. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17389-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17389-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17388-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17389-0

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics