Skip to main content

Customer Reviews: The Importance of Personal Factors That Influence the Consumer Reaction Within Webshops

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1093 Accesses

Abstract

On the one hand the rapid spread of the internet makes it possible for consumers to compare offers on the market (Park & Lee, 2009; Henning-Thurau & Walsh, 2003), on the other they can express their experience and opinions in the form of electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) and interact with each other (King, Racherla, & Bush, 2014). The generic term eWOM includes different types and technologies such as blogs, tweets, forum, chats etc. (Cheung, Luo, Sia, & Chen, 2009; Dhar & Chang, 2009; Kozinets, De Valck, Wojnicki, & Wilner, 2010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

List of References

  • Chakravarty, A., Liu, Y., & Mazumdar, T. (2010). The differential effects of online word-of-mouth and critics’ reviews on pre-release movie evaluation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24(3), 185-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Wang, Q., & Xie, J. (2011). Online social interactions: A natural experiment on word of mouth versus observational learning. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(2), 238-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C. M. K., Xiao, B., & Liu, I. L. B. (2012). The impact of observational learning and electronic word of mouth on consumer purchase decisions: The moderating role of consumer expertise and consumer involvement. In System Science HICSS (Ed.), 45 th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp.3228 – 3237). Washington, WA: IEEE Computer Society Conference Publication Service

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, M. Y., Luo, C., Sia, C. L., & Chen, H. (2009). Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational and normative determinants of on-line consumer recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(4), 9-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345-354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, V., & Chang, E. A. (2009). Does chatter matter? The impact of usergenerated content on music sales. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(4), 300-307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doh, S. J., & Hwang, J.-S. (2009). How consumers evaluate eWOM (electronic word-of-mouth) messages. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(2), 193-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2008). The dynamics of online word-of mouth and product sales – An empirical investigation of the movie industry. Journal of Retailing, 84(2), 233-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Y.-W., Miao, Y.-F., Fang, Y.-H., & Lin, R.-Y. (2013). Establishing the adoption of electronic word-of-mouth through consumers’ perceived credibility. International Business Research, 6(3), 58-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floh, A., Koller, M., & Zauner, A. (2013). Taking a deeper look at online reviews: The asymmetric effect of valence intensity on shopping behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(5-6), 646-670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell, L., Stine, J., Sethi, H., & Noronha, A. (2013). Catch and keep digital shoppers. Retrieved April15, 2016, from http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/about/ac79/docs/retail/Catch-and-Keep-the-Digital-Shopper_PoV.pdf

  • Gottschalk, S., & Mafael, A. (2014, September 19). Die digitale Herausforderung: Wie gehen Konsumenten mit Online-Bewertungen um? Retrieved April 20, 2016, from http://www.srf.ch/content/download/5275986/71377626/version/1/file/eWOM-Studie-FUBerlin_kjero+com-2014-09-19.pdf

  • Hansen, F. (1976). Psychological theories of consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 3(3), 117-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., & Walsh, G. (2003). Electronic word-of-mouth: Motives for and consequences of reading customer articulations on the internet. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(2), 51-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalilvand, M. R., & Samiei, N. (2012). The impact of electronic word of mouth on a tourism destination choice. Testing the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Internet Research, 22(5), 591-612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, F. R., & Mendoza, N. A. (2013). Too popular to ignore: The influence of online reviews on purchase intentions of search and experience products. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(3), 226-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E. E. K., Mattila, A. S., & Baloglu, S. (2011). Effects of gender and expertise on consumers’ motivation to read online hotel reviews. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 52(4), 399-406.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. A., Racherla, P., & Bush, V. D. (2014). What we know and don’t know about online word-of-mouth: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(3), 167-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V., De Valck, K., Wojnicki, A. C., & Wilner, S. J. S. (2010). Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 71-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., Rodgers, S., & Kim, M. (2009). Effects of valence and extremity of eWOM on attitude toward the brand and website. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 31(2), 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., & Youn, S. (2009). Electronic word of mouth (eWOM): How eWOM platforms influence consumer product judgement. International Journal of Advertising: The Quarterly Review of Marketing Communications, 28(3), 473-499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Zhan, L. (2011). Online persuasion: How the written word drives WOM: Evidence from consumer-generated product reviews. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1), 239-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackiewicz, J., & Yeats, D. (2014). Product review users‘ perceptions of review quality: The role of credibility, informativeness and readability. IEEE Tranactions on professional Communication, 57(4), 309-324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C., & Lee, T. M. (2009). Information direction, website reputation and ewom effect: A moderating role of product type. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 61-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, D.-H., & Kim, S. (2008). The effects of consumer knowledge on message processing of electronic word-of-mouth via online consumer reviews. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 399-410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, D.-H., Lee, J., & Han, I. (2007). The effect of online consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(4), 125-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, R. M., & Bickart, B. (2012). Perceived helpfulness of online consumer reviews: The role of message content and style. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(3), 234-243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, A. E. (2011). Can including pros and cons increase the helpfulness and persuasiveness of online reviews? The interactive effects of ratings and arguments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(3), 226-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., & Lerman, D. (2007). Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the web. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 76-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trusov, M., Bucklin, R. E., & Pauwels, K. (2009). Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 90-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. (2011). The effect of inconsistent word-of-mouth during the service encounter. Journal of Services Marketing, 25(4), 252-259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willemsen, L. M., Neijens, P. C., Bronner, F., & De Ridder, J. A. (2011). “Highly recommended!” The content characteristics and perceived usefulness of online consumer reviews. Journal of Computer-mediated communication, 17(1), 19-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, P., Chen, L., & Santhanam, R. (2015). Will video be the next generation of ecommerce product reviews? Presentation format and the role of product type. Decision Support Systems, 73, 85-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. Q., Craciun, G., & Shin, D. (2010). When does electronic word-ofmouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1336-1341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, F., & Zhang, X. M. (2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 133-148.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michaela Gahbauer M.A. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gahbauer, M. (2017). Customer Reviews: The Importance of Personal Factors That Influence the Consumer Reaction Within Webshops. In: Becker, T., Schneckenleitner, P., Reitberger, W., Brunner-Sperdin, A. (eds) Conference Proceedings Trends in Business Communication 2016. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17254-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics