Abstract
As elaborated in chapter 4.2 the comparative perspective provided by multiple case studies allows for the identification of patterns in the independent variables of the phenomenon analysed. This is a crucial prerequisite for the analytical generalisation of the findings in qualitative research designs (Yin, 2009). In this comparative case study analysis four independent variables have been drawn from the literature to derive explanations for success and failure in transnational urban partnership projects on low carbon development.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beermann, J. (2017). Cross-Case Comparison: Testing the Research Hypotheses. In: Urban Cooperation and Climate Governance . Energiepolitik und Klimaschutz. Energy Policy and Climate Protection. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17146-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17146-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17145-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17146-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)