Advertisement

On Belonging and Being Professional: In Pursuit of an Ethics of Sharing in Project Teams

Chapter
Part of the Management – Culture – Interpretation book series (MCI)

Abstract

This chapter seeks to advance an ethics of sharing through the lens of a project team of a global management-consulting firm. Today’s project teams are heavily burdened by dominant project management approaches that are overly reliant on pre-defined knowledge, standardisation of practice, and the pursuit of a unitary identity in teams. In re-thinking current practice, this chapter introduces a performative view of project teams that constructs social selves and identities in different situated and on-going narratives of project work. Unlike the mainly ‘value-free’ view of today’s project management, project teams imagine the own social space creatively whilst in action, thus constructing different narratives about preferred ways of doing and being in projects. In particular, ‘being professional’ is entangled with on-going identifications and personal senses of belonging in the team. Methodologically, the adoption of a two-way narrative analysis including a focus on poetic tropes contained in narratives reveals what is considered legitimate or not in every-day team practice.

Findings show the emergence of three types of ethical imagination in terms of emphatic, normative as well as more explicit ethical dimensions defining the team’s life-world. They can support an alternative view of professional identities and of their sustainability in project work. Starting from a dynamic view of project management practice, they tentatively address questions and issues that are often neglected in project management such as the role of wisdom, beyond merely standardised knowledge and expertise, and the creation of alternative forms of responsibility and citizenship in groups. More often than not, these need to be fostered in fragile and hybrid spaces of collective action whilst the possibility (or indeed desirability) of solidarity in the realm of project work may be questioned and challenged. Yet the reward of engaging in a more nuanced manner with an ethics of sharing ‘on the ground’ will allow for opening up spaces of belonging and the expansion of moral imaginations in projects.

Keywords

Project Management Project Team Professional Identity Social Space Project Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agamben, G. (1993): The coming community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bachmann-Medick, D. (2015): Cultural turns: New orientations in the study of culture. Translated by Adam Blauhut. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, M.M. (1965): Rabelais and his world. Trans. Helene Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana UP.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, V. (1999): Performativity and belonging: An introduction. In: Theory, Culture, & Society, 16(2), 1-10.Google Scholar
  5. Bhabha, H. (1990): The third space: Interview with Homi Bhabha. In: Rutherford, J. (Ed.) Identity: Community, culture, difference. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 207-221.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, J. (1993): Bodies that matter. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, D. and Shapiro, M. (1999): Introduction: From ethical theory to the ethical relation. In: Campbell, D. and Shapiro, M. (Eds.): Moral spaces: Rethinking ethics and world politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, vii-xx.Google Scholar
  8. Castoriadis, C. (1987): The imaginary institution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Castoriadis, C. (1994): Radical imagination and the social instituting imaginary. In: Robinson, G. and Rundell, J. (Eds.): Rethinking imagination: Culture and creativity. London: Routledge, 136-154.Google Scholar
  10. Castoriadis, C. (1991): Philosophy, politics, autonomy: Essays in political philosophy. Translated by D. Ames. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Clegg, S.R. and Rhodes, C. (2006) (Eds.): Management ethics – contemporary contexts. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  12. Croucher, S. (2004): Globalization and belonging: The politics of identity in a changing world. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  13. De Certeau, M. (1984): The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Derrida, J. (1990): Force of law: The ‘mystical foundation of authority’. In: Cardozo Law Review, 11, 919-1045.Google Scholar
  15. Elliott, A. (2004): Subject to ourselves: Social theory, psychoanalysis and postmodernity, 2nd edition. Boulder: Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  16. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001): Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again (reprinted 2003). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Frith, S. (1996): Music and identity. In: Hall, S. and du Gay, P. (Eds.): Questions of cultural identity. London: Sage, 108-202.Google Scholar
  18. Gabriel, Y. (2000): Storytelling in organisations: Facts, fictions, and fantasies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gabriel Y. (2003): Glass palaces and glass cages: Organizations in times of flexible work, fragmented consumption and fragile selves. In: Ephemera, 3(3), 166-184.Google Scholar
  20. Grossberg, L. (1996): The space of culture, the power of space. In: I. Chambers and L. Curti (Eds.): That Post-Colonial Question. London: Routledge, 169-188.Google Scholar
  21. Hall. S. (1990): Cultural identity and diaspora. In: J. Rutherford (Ed.): Identity. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 222-237.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, S. (1996): Introduction: Who needs ‘identity’? In: Hall, S. and du Gay, P. (Eds.): Questions of cultural identity. London: Sage, 1-17.Google Scholar
  23. Harré, R. and Langenhove, L. (1999): Positioning theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Heath, G. (1999): Educating for the imagination. UltiBASE articles, December edition.Google Scholar
  25. Hodgson, D.E. (2004): Project teams: The legacy of bureaucratic control in the post-Bureaucratic organization. In: Organization, 11(1), 81-100.Google Scholar
  26. Hodgson, D.E. and Cicmil, S. (2006): Making projects critical. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  27. Jones, C. (2007): Editorial introduction to special issue ‘Levinas, business, ethics’. In: Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(3): 196-202.Google Scholar
  28. Kosellek, R. (1979) (Ed.): Historische Semantik und Begriffsgeschichte. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
  29. Küpers, W. (2015): Phenomenology of the embodied organization: The construction of Meleau-Ponty for a carnal organisation studies and practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Ingold, T. (2000): The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge, 219-242.Google Scholar
  31. Langellier, K. (2001): You’re marked: Breast cancer, tattoo and the narrative performance of identity. In: Brockmeier, J. and Carbaugh, D. (Eds.): Narrative and identity: Studies in autobiography, self and culture. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 145-184.Google Scholar
  32. Levinas, E. (1985): Ethics and infinity: Conversations with Philippe Nemo (translated by R. Cohen). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lefebvre, H. (1991): The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell [original 1974].Google Scholar
  34. Maffesoli, M. (1996): The time of the tribes: The decline of individualism in mass society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Melucci, A. and Avritzer, L. (2000): Complexity, cultural pluralism and democracy: Collective action and the public space. In: Trends and Developments, 39(4), 507-527.Google Scholar
  36. Nancy, J.L. (1991): The inoperative community (translated by P. Conner, L. Garbus, M. Holland and S. Sawhney, edited by P. Conner). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  37. Nancy, J.L. (1993): The experience of freedom (translated by B. McDonald). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Nancy, J.L. (2000): Being singular plural (translated by R. Richardson and A. O’Byrne). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Newton, J. and Goodman, H. (2009): Systems psychodynamics and communicative space. In: Action Research, 7(3), 291-312.Google Scholar
  40. Nocker, M.O. (2006): The contested object: Projects as emergent space. In: Hodgson, D.E. and Cicmil, S. (Eds.): Making projects critical. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan, 132-154.Google Scholar
  41. Parker, M. (2003): Introduction: Ethics, politics and organizing. In: Organization, 10(2), 187-203.Google Scholar
  42. Schinkel, A. (2005): Imagination as category of history: An essay concerning Koselleck’s concept of Erfahrungsraum and Erwartungshorizont. In: History and Theory, 44, 42-54.Google Scholar
  43. Shotter, J. (2005): ‘Inside the moment of managing’: Wittgenstein and the everyday dynamics of our expressive-responsive activities. In: Organization Studies, 26(1), 113-135.Google Scholar
  44. Stoezler, M. and Yuval-Davis, N. (2002): Standpoint theory, situated knowledge and the situated imagination. In: Feminist Theory, 3(3), 315-333.Google Scholar
  45. Sutton-Smith, B. (1988): In search of the imagination. In: Egan, K. and Nadaner, D. (Eds.): Imagination and education. New York: Teachers College Press, 3-29.Google Scholar
  46. Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (2002): On organisational becoming: Rethinking Organisational Change. In: Organization Science, 13(5), 567-582.Google Scholar
  47. Wicks, P. G. and Reason, P. (2009): Initiating action research: Challenges and paradoxes of opening communicative space. In: Action Research, 7(3), 243-262.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Management Science and Entrepreneurship Group Essex Business SchoolUniversity of Essex Southend CampusEssexUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations