Skip to main content

Determining Performances of Innovation and Exports in Turkey and Selected Countries via Malmquist Index for the Period of 1996–2012

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 716 Accesses

Part of the book series: FOM-Edition ((INTSE))

Abstract

Innovation, as a means of improving new product and process, is able to transform the quality of tradable goods at the context of international trade relations. Developments in educational level of labour force, vocational technical capacity and capability configure product range like research and development (R&D) activities in such a way that it contains further technologies. R&D expenditures and increasing schooling rates enable to use and reach advanced technology by increasing the quality of labour force. This situation develops not only general export volume but also the technology contents of exports. Increasing advanced technology exports increases welfare gains through foreign trade. On the other hand, fixed capital investments and foreign direct investments are in the basic inputs of innovativeness capacity.

Turkish economy has experienced important economical and technological transformations since the midst of 1990s. Economic growth of the country has been recorded regularly except for 2001 and 2009. GDP value per capita has three‐folded since the beginning of 2000s until today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Braunerhjelm, P., & Thulin, P. (2008). Can countries create comparative advantages? R&D-expenditures, high-tech exports and country size in 19 OECD-countries, 1981–1999. International Economic Journal, 22(1), 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Diewert, W. E. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica, 50(6), 1393–1414. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units”. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1979). Short communication: measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 3, 339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1951). The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica, 19(3), 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estache, A., Be, B. T., & Trujillo, L. (2004). Sources of efficiency gains in port reform: a DEA decomposition of a malmquist TFP indeks for Mexico. Utulities Policy, 12, 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R. (1988). Fundamentals of production theory. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., & Roos, P. (1994a). Productivity Developments in Swedish Hospitals: A Malmquist Output Index Approach. In A. Charnes et al. (ed.), Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications (pp. 253–272). Norwell: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994b). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review, 84(1), 66–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaöz, M., Albeni, M., & Demirgil, H. (2008). Innovative abilities of developing countries and their export performance: evidence from Turkey. International Conference on Management and Economics, Epoka University. Tiran, 28.–29. March 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. C. (1951). An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In T. C. Koopmans (ed.), Activity analysis of production and allocation. New Jersey: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C., & Lovell, C. A. K. (2000). Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, F. F., & Wang, P. H. (2008). DEA malmquist productivity measure: Taiwanese semiconductor companies. International Journal of Production Ecoonomic, 112, 367–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmquist, S. (1953). Index number and indifferences surfaces. Trabajos de Estatistica, 4, 209–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2015). http://stats.oecd.org. Accessed 28. Feb. 2015.

  • Özçelik, E., & Taymaz, E. (2004). Does innovativeness matter for international competitiveness in developing countries?: the case of Turkish manufacturing industries. Research Policy, 33(3), 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogiatzoglou, K. (2009). Determinants of exports specialization in ICT. A cross-country analysis”. international network for economic research working paper 3. http://www.infer-research.eu/en/publications/download/10. Accessed 25. Feb. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2016). http://databank.worldbank.org/data. Accessed 17. Feb. 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuf Bayraktutan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kutlar, A., Bayraktutan, Y., Bıdırdı, H. (2018). Determining Performances of Innovation and Exports in Turkey and Selected Countries via Malmquist Index for the Period of 1996–2012. In: Bakırcı, F., Heupel, T., Kocagöz, O., Özen, Ü. (eds) German-Turkish Perspectives on IT and Innovation Management. FOM-Edition(). Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16962-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics