Skip to main content

Resilience Thinking as Leitmotif in Urban and Regional Planning Dealing with Climate Change Impacts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studien zur Resilienzforschung ((STRE))

Abstract

Resilience thinking is related to spatial planning within the context of strategies to deal with climate change impacts in coastal urban regions and the consequent challenges posed to planning. The notion of resilience thinking is based on an emphasis on complexity and learning to live with change, adopting a perspective of social and ecological interdependencies and questioning paths already taken and taking into account potential transformations. This widened understanding is considered useful for tackling the challenges future climate change impacts pose on current decisions on land use. Potential gains as well as trade-offs that could occur by applying this perspective as a leitmotif within spatial planning are discussed and related to the challenges climate change places on to planning. The conceptual reflections are illustrated with empirical examples in Europe and the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adger, W. N. (2008). Ecological and social resilience. In G. Atkinson, S. Dietz, & E. Neumayer (Eds.), Handbook of sustainable development reprinted (pp. 78–90). Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albers, M., & Deppisch, S. (2012). Resilience in the light of climate change: Useful approach or empty phrase for spatial planning? European Planning Studies iFirst article: pp. 1–13. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722961.

  • Allen, P. M., Strathern, M., & Baldwin, J. (2008). Complexity: The integrating framework for models of urban and regional systems. In S. Albeverio, D. Andrey, P. Giordano, & A. Vancheri (Eds.), The dynamics of complex urban systems: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 21–41). Heidelberg: Physica.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beatley, T. W. (2009). Planning for coastal resilience: Best practices for calamitous times. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2003). Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Buidling Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann, J., Garschagen, M., Kraas, F., & Quang, N. (2010). Adaptive urban governance: New challenges for the second generation of urban adaptation strategies to climate change. Sustainability Science, 5, 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, H., & Alberti, M. (2009). Building capacity to adapt to climate change through planning. In H. Blanco & M. Alberti (Eds.), Hot, congested, crowded and diverse: Emerging research agendas in planning. Progress in Planning (Vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 158–169).

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgström, S. T., Elmqvist, T., Angelstam, P., & Alfsen-Norodom, C. (2006). Scale mismatches in management of urban landscapes. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, F. S., & Jax, K. (2007). Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: Resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carolan, M. S. (2004). Ontological politics: Mapping a complex environmental problem. Environmental Values, 13(4), 497–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S., Westley, F., & Turnerm, M. (2005). Surrogates for resilience of social–ecological systems. Ecosystems, 8, 941–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coaffee, J., Murakami, W. D., & Rogers, P. (2009). The everyday resilience of the city. How cities respond to terrorism and disaster. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi, S. (2012). Resilience, a bridging concept or a dead end? Planning Theory and Practice, 13(2), 299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi, S., Crawford, J., & Mehmood, A. (2009). Climate change and spatial planning responses. In S. Davoudi, J. Crawford, & A. Mehmood (Eds.), Planning for climate change: Strategies for mitigation and adaptation for spatial planners (pp. 7–19). London: Sterling VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, R., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7, 260–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deppisch, S., Albers, M., & Selinger, J. (2011). Adaptation of urban regions of the Baltic Sea coast to climate change: Challenges and approaches. In G. Schernewski, J. Hofstede, & T. Neumann (Eds.), Global change and Baltic coastal zones (pp. 213–231). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deppisch, S., Beichler, S. A., Davidse, B. J., Othengrafen, M., Richter, M., Schulz, L., et al. (2014). Schlussbericht plan Baltic - Klimawandel und Raumentwicklung: Anpassungsstrategien der Stadt- und Regionalplanung in Stadtregionen der Küstenzone am Beispiel des Ostseeraumes (Final report plan B:altic Climate change and spatial development: Adaptation strategies of urban and regional planning in coastal urban regions at the Baltic Sea coast). Hamburg: HafenCity University Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakin, H., Tompkins, E. L., Nelson, D. R., & Anderies, J. M. (2009). Hidden costs and disparate uncertainties: Trade-offs involved in approaches to climate policy. In W. N. Adger, I. Lorenzoni, & K. O’Brien (Eds.), Adapting to climate change: Thresholds, values, governance (pp. 212–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ekelund, N. (2007). Adapting to climate change in Stockholm. Stockholm’s action programme on climate change. City of Stockholm, Environment and Health Administration. http://miljobarometern.stockholm.se/content/docs/gc/1/Adapting%20to%20ClimateChange_Sthlm_english.pdf

  • Elmqvist, T., Colding, J., Barthel, S., Borgström, S., Duit, A., Lundberg, J., et al. (2004). The dynamics of social-ecological systems in urban landscapes: Stockholm and the National Urban Park, Sweden. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1023, 308–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischhauer, M. (2008). The role of spatial planning in strengthening urban resilience. In H. J. Pasman & I. A. Kirillov (Eds.), Resilience of cities to terrorist and other threats. Learning from 9/11 and further research issues (pp. 273–298). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. The Environmental Advisory Council to the Swedish Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, T. (2003). Critical political ecology: The politics of environmental science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godschalk, D. R. (2003). Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review, 4(3), 136–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, B. E. (2009). Resilience to surprises though communicative planning. Ecology and society, 14(2), 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, B. E., & Butler, W. H. (2012). Collaborating for transformative resilience: Shared identity in the US fire learning network. In B. E. Goldstein (Ed.), Collaborative resilience: From crisis to opportunity (pp. 339–358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L. P., Andreasson, J., & Persson, G. (2006). Impacts of future climate change and sea level rise in the Stockholm region: Part 1—The effect on water levels in Lake Mälaren. Special Paper. Geological Survey of Finland, Vol. 41, pp. 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemeier-Klose, M., Albers, M., Richter, M., & Deppisch, S. (2013). Szenario-Planung als Instrument einer “klimawandelangepassten” Stadt- und Regionalplanung – Einflussfaktorenanalyse und Szenarienkonstruktion im Stadt-Umland-Raum Rostock. Raumordnung und Raumforschung, 71(5), 413–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallegatte, S. (2009). Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Global Environmental Change, 19, 240–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch Hadorn, G., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Joye, D., Pohl, C., et al. (2008). Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J., Di Vittorio, S., & Booher, D. E. (2009). Governance for the Megaregion of Northern California: A Framework for Action. Global Metropolitan Studies. Berkeley: IURD, University of California. http://www.csus.edu/ccp/publications/Governance_Megaregion.pdf

  • Kumagai, Y., Gibson, R. B., & Filion, P. (2010). Translating resilience into the urban context: Past successes and future uncertainties in Tokyo. Critical Planning. UCLA Urban Planning Journal, 17, 67–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, A. E., & Gerger Swartling, Å. (2009). Social learning about climate adaptation: Global and local perspectives. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute. http://sei-international.org/mediamanager/documents/Publications/Policy-institutions/social_learning_wp_091112.pdf

  • Pendall, R., Foster, K. A., & Cowell, M. A. (2010). Resilience and regions: Building understanding of the metaphor. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3, 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revi, A., Satterthwaite, D. E., Aragón-Durand, F., Corfee-Morlot, J., Kiunsi, R. B. R., Pelling, M., et al. (2014). Urban areas. In C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. March, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. Otsuki Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014. Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 535–612). Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruth, M., & Coelho, S. (2007). Understanding and managing the complexity of urban systems under climate change. Climate Policy, 7(2007), 317–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C., & Walker, B. (2001). Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature, 413(6856), 591–596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SF San Franscisco Public Utilities Commission. (2004). Summary of the commission’s climate program. Climate action plan for San Francisco. San Francisco Department of the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • SFBCDC San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. (2011). http://www.bcdc.ca.gov/planning/climate_change/summCCP.shtml

  • Smith, C., & Levermore, G. (2008). Designing urban spaces and buildings to improve sustainability and quality of life in a warmer world. Energy Policy, 36(12), 4558–4562. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souch, C., & Grimmond, S. (2006). Applied climatology: urban climate. Progress in Physical Geography, 30, 270–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPUR San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association. (2011). Climate change hits home: Adaptation strategies for the San Francisco Bay Area. SPUR Report 5/2011. San Francisco: SPUR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanstrom, T. (2008). Regional resilience: A critical examination of the ecological framework. IURD Working Paper Series 2008–07. Berkeley: University of California. http://www.iurd.berkeley.edu/publications/wp/2008-07.pdf

  • Viehhauser, M., Larsson, K., & Stalnacke, J. (2006). Impacts of future climate change and sea level rise in the Stockholm region: Part II—GIS analysis of future flooding risks at regional and municipal scales. Special Paper. Geological Survey of Finland, Vol. 41, pp. 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology & Society, 9(2), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., & Salt, D. (2006). Resilience thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardekker, J. A., Jong, A., Knoop, J. M., & Sluijs, J. P. (2009). Operationalising a resilience approach to adapting an urban delta to uncertain climate changes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 987–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S. M., Randolph, J., & London, J. B. (2009). Planning and Climate: an emerging research agenda. In H. Blanco & M. Alberti (Eds.), Shaken, shrinking, hot, impoverished and informal: Emerging research agendas in planning. Progress in Planning (Vol. 72, pp. 210–222).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, C. (2012). Social-ecological resilience: Insights and issues for planning theory. Planning Theory, 11(2), 148–169. doi:10.1177/1473095211426274.

  • Wilkinson, C., Porter, L., & Colding, J. (2010). Metropolitan planning and resilience thinking: A practitioner’s perspective. Critical Planning. UCLA Urban Planning Journal, 17, 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the German Federal Ministry of Research and Education for funding parts of this research (FKZ 01UU0909).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonja Deppisch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Deppisch, S. (2017). Resilience Thinking as Leitmotif in Urban and Regional Planning Dealing with Climate Change Impacts. In: Deppisch, S. (eds) Urban Regions Now & Tomorrow. Studien zur Resilienzforschung. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16759-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics