Beyond a Fragmented and Sector-Oriented Knowledge for a Sustainable and Resilient Urban Development. The Case of the Metropolitan City of Naples

Chapter
Part of the Studien zur Resilienzforschung book series (STRE)

Abstract

Numerous scholars have recently focused on the multiple challenges—from the environmental crisis to the impacts of climate change and natural and man-made hazards—threatening cities’ future. Most of them have clearly highlighted the increasing interdependencies among these threats, their close dependency on urban development processes, as well as the need for avoiding policy silos and promoting cross-sectoral strategies in the face of these challenges. In this line, the contribution explores the interactions among urban development processes, loss and/or degradation of natural resources, climate change and disaster risks. Then, focusing on the Metropolitan City of Naples, it highlights difficulties and opportunities arising from a better integration of the available fragmented and sector-oriented knowledge, as a key step to provide planners and decision makers with a comprehensive understanding of human and natural dynamics capable to support cross-sectoral strategies for a sustainable and resilient urban development.

Keywords

Methane Dioxide Europe Photosynthesis Asphalt 

References

  1. Ahern, J. (2011). From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 341–343. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
  2. Ancione, G., Milazzo, M. F., Salzano, E., & Maschio, G. (2014). A GIS-Tool for the vulnerability mapping of industrial facilities potentially exposed to volcanic na-tech events. In R. D. J. M. Steenberger, P. H. A. J. M. van Gelder, et al. (Eds.), Safety reliability and risk analysis: Beyond the horizon. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  3. Attardi, R., Cerreta, M., Sannicandro, V., & Torre, C. M. (2015). The Multidimensional assessment of land take and soil sealing. In: O. Gervasi, B. Murgante, S. Misra, M. L. Gavrilova, A. M. A. C. Rocha, C. M. Torre, D. Taniar, & B. O. Apduhan (Eds.). Computational science and its applications—ICCSA 2015 (Vol. 9157, pp. 301–316).Google Scholar
  4. Banholzer, S., Kossin, J., & Donner, S. (2014). The impact of climate change on natural disasters. In: Z. Zommers, A. Singh (Eds.). Reducing disaster: Early warning systems for climate change. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-8598-3_2
  5. Boltz, F., Turner, W. R., Larsen F. W., Scholz, I., & Guarín, A. (2013). Post 2015: Reconsidering sustainable development goals: Is the environment merely a dimension? D.I.E. Briefing Paper 4/2013. https://www.die-gdi.de/en/briefing-paper/article/post-2015-reconsidering-sustainable-development-goals-is-the-environment-merely-a-dimension/. Accessed 22 October 2015.
  6. Carter, J. G., Cavan, G., Connelly, A., Guy, S., Handley, J., & Kazmierczak, A. (2015). Climate change and the city: Building capacity for urban adaptation. Progress in Planning, 95, 1–66. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2013.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Childers, D. L., Cadenasso, M. L., Grove, J. M., Marshall, V., McGrath, B., & Pickett, S. T. A. (2015). An ecology for cities: A transformational nexus of design and ecology to advance climate change resilience and urban sustainability. Sustainability, 7, 3774–3791. doi: 10.3390/su7043774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colucci, A. (2015). The potential of periurban areas for the resilience of metropolitan region, Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment 8 (Special Issue ECCA 2015), 103–122. doi: 10.6092/1970-9870/3655
  9. Costanza, R., Perez-Maqueo, O., Martinez, L., Sutton, P., Anderson, S. J., & Mulder, K. (2008). The value of coastal wetlands for hurricane protection. A Journal of the Human Environment, 37(4), 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., et al. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18, 598–606. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davoudi, S., & Cowie, P. (2016). Guiding principles of good territorial governance. In: P. Schmitt, & L. Van Welle (Eds.). Territorial governance across Europe. Pathways, practices and prospects. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Davoudi, S., Brooks, E., & Mehmood, A. (2013). Evolutionary resilience and strategies for climate adaptation. Planning Practice & Research 28(3), 307–322. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
  13. Davoudi, S., Crawford, J., & Mehmood, A. (2009). Planning for climate change: Strategies for mitigation and adaptation for spatial planners. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  14. EEA. (2006). Urban sprawl in Europe. The ignored challenge. EEA Report no. 10, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea_report_2006_10. Accessed 22 October 2015.
  15. EEA. (2012). Urban adaptation to climate change in Europe, challenges and opportunities for cities together with supportive National and European Policies, EEA Report no. 2, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/urban-adaptation-to-climate-change. Accessed 22 October 2015.
  16. EEA (2015a). The European Environment State and Outlook 2015. Resource Efficiency and the Low-Carbon Economy. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark. http://www.eea.europa.eu/soer-2015/synthesis/report/4-resourceefficiency. Accessed 20 January 2016.
  17. EEA. (2015b). Map Book Urban Vulnerability to Climate Change – Factsheets. http://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu/documents/18/0/Factsheets+for+urban+vulnerability+map+book/5e7895f4-4b42-4e61-b04b-e250407cf6dd. Accessed 2 February 2016.
  18. EFDRR (European Forum for Disaster Risk Reduction). (2013). How does Europe Link DRR and CCA? Working group on climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. http://www.unisdr.org/files/35277_ddrccafinal.pdf. Accessed 22 October 2015.
  19. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency US). (2013). Our built and natural environments. A technical review of the interactions among land use, transportation, and environmental quality (2nd ed.). http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/our-built-and-natural-environments. Accessed 24 January 2016.
  20. EUCO2. (2009). Report “The EUCO2 Project Stage 2 Naples”. http://www.euco2.eu/resources/Naples-Scenarios.pdf. Accessed 5 February 2016.
  21. Galderisi, A. (2014). Urban resilience: A framework for empowering cities in face of heterogeneous risk factors. ITUA|Z 1(11), 36–58. http://www.az.itu.edu.tr/azvol11no1web/06-Galderisi-1101.pdf. Accessed 24 January 2016.
  22. Gambino, R. (1995). Separare quando necessario. Integrare ovunque possibile. Urbanistica 104.Google Scholar
  23. Gencer, E. A. (2013). The interplay between urban development, vulnerability and risk management. A case study of the Istanbul Metropolitan Area. Mediterranean Studies 7. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-29470-9_2
  24. Guha-Sapir, D., Hoyois, P., & Below, R. (2014). The Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2014. The Numbers and Trends. http://www.cred.be/sites/default/files/ADSR_2014.pdf. Accessed 20 January 2016.
  25. Handmer, J. (2008). Emergency management thrives on uncertainty. In G. Bammer & M. Smithson (Eds.), Uncertainty and risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 231–243). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  26. Head, B. W. (2014). Evidence, uncertainty, and wicked problems in climate change decision making in Australia. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(4), 663–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoff, H. (2011). Understanding the Nexus. Background paper for the Bonn 2011 conference: The water, energy and food security Nexus. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm. http://wef-conference.gwsp.org/fileadmin/documents_news/understanding_the_nexus.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2016.
  28. IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2013. The physical science basis, working group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/. Accessed 2 February 2016.
  29. ISPRA. (2015). Il Consumo di suolo in Italia. http://www.isprambiente.gov.it/it/pubblicazioni/rapporti/il-consumo-di-suolo-in-italia-edizione-2015. Accessed 22 January 2016.
  30. Komendantova, N., Mrzyglocki, R., Mignan, A., Khazai, B., Wenzel, F., Patt, A., et al. (2014). Multi-hazard and multi-risk decision-support tools as a part of participatory risk governance: Feedback from civil protection stakeholder. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.006.Google Scholar
  31. Krausmann, E., Cozzani, V., Salzano, E., & Renni, E. (2011). Industrial accidents triggered by natural hazards: An emerging risk issue. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 11, 921–929, 2011 doi: 10.5194/nhess-11-921-2011
  32. Loevinsohn, M., Mehta, L., Cuming, K., Nicol, A. Cumming, & Ensink O. H. J. (2014). The cost of a knowledge silo: a systematic re-review of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions. Health Policy and Planning 1–15. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu039
  33. MATTM—Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare. (2013). Elementi per una Strategia Nazionale di Adattamento ai Cambiamento Climatici. http://www.minambiente.it/notizie/strategia-nazionale-di-adattamento-ai-cambiamenti-climatici-0. Accessed 19 January 2016.
  34. McDonald, R. I., Marcotullio, P. J., & Güneralp, B. (2013). Urbanization and global trends in biodiversity and ecosystem services. In: T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias et al. (Eds.). Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. A global assessment. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1
  35. Mc Harg, I. (1969). Design with nature. New York: Natural History Press, Garden City.Google Scholar
  36. McKinney, M. L. (2008). Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11(2), 161–176. doi: 10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4
  37. McPhearson, T. (2014). The rise of resilience: Linking resilience and sustainability in city planning. http://www.thenatureofcities.com/2014/06/08/the-rise-of-resilience-linking-resilience-and-sustainability-in-city-planning/. Accessed 23 January 2016.
  38. Mehmood, A. (2015). Of resilient places: Planning for urban resilience. European Planning Studies. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980.Google Scholar
  39. Menoni, S., Galderisi, A (2016). Improving the role of land use planning for reducing existing and future risks (in print). http://www.unisdr.org/campaign/resilientcities/home/manage_private_pages. Accessed 9 February 2016.
  40. Munich-RE. (2014). TOPICS GEO. Natural catastrophes 2014. Analyses, Assessments, Positions. 2015 Issue. https://www.munichre.com/site/mram-mobile/get/documents_E-1601714186/mram/assetpool.mr_america/PDFs/3_Publications/Topics_Geo_2014.pdf. Accessed 8 February 2016.
  41. Morin, E., & Kern, B. (1999). Homeland Earth: A Manifesto for the New Millennium. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  42. Norton, J., Atun, F., & Dandoulaki, M. (2015). Exploring issues limiting the use of knowledge in disaster risk reduction. Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 8 (Special Issue ECCA 2015), 135–154. doi: 10.6092/1970-9870/3032
  43. Pitt, M. (2008). The pitt review—Learning lessons from the 2007 floods. Cabinet Office, 22 Whitehall, London SW1A 2WH. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20080906001345/cabinetoffice.gov.uk/thepittreview.aspx. Accessed 24 January 2016.
  44. Petralli, M., Brandani, G., Massetti, L., & Orlandini, S. (2014). L’uso del verde in ambiente urbano. In: F. Musco, & L. Fregolent (Eds.). Pianificazione Urbanistica e Clima Urbano. Manuale per la riduzione dei fenomeni di isola di calore urbano. Padova: Il Poligrafo Srl. http://www.iuav.it/Ateneo1/chi-siamo/pubblicazi1/freschi-di/musco_UHI_poligrafo.pdf. Accessed 29 January 2016.
  45. Pistocchi, A., Calzolari, C., Malucelli, F., & Ungaro, F. (2015). Soil sealing and flood risks in the plains of Emilia-Romagna, Italy. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 4, 398–409. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.06.021.Google Scholar
  46. Province of Naples. (2014). Rapporto Ambientale per la Valutazione Ambientale Strategica della Proposta di Piano Territoriale di Coordinamento Provinciale. Proposta di PTCP Napoli, 2013. http://www.cittametropolitana.na.it/documents/10181/1187776/Rapporto+Ambientale+e+Studio+di+Incidenza.pdf/76a3cb49-f84c-4e88-9ec4-227a96c41b68. Accessed 10 February 2016.
  47. Quarantelli, E. L. (1993). Technological and natural disasters and ecological problems: Similarities and differences in planning for and managing them. Background discussion paper for the Colloquium on Challenges of Technological and Ecological Disasters on May 11, 1993 in Mexico City, Mexico. http://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/620. Accessed 29 January 2016.
  48. Regional Authority of the Central Campania Basin. (2014). Relazione Idrologica PSAI 2014. http://www.adbcampaniacentrale2.it/documenti/psai/relazioni/RelazioneIdrologica.pdf. Accessed 31 January 2016.
  49. Richardson, G. R. A., & Otero, J. (2012). Land use planning tools for local adaptation to climate change. Ottawa: Ont. Government of Canada. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2013/rncan-nrcan/M4-106-2012-eng.pdf. Accessed 22 October 2015.
  50. Stolte, J., Tesfai, M., Øygarden, L., et al. (Eds.). (2015). Soil threats in Europe. EUR 27607 EN. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2788/828742.
  51. UN. (2014). World urbanization prospect. Population Division World Urbanization Prospects. The 2014 Revision, Highlights. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Highlights/WUP2014-Highlights.pdf. Accessed 20 October 2015.
  52. UN. (2012). The future we want. http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/rio20_outcome_document_complete.pdf. Accessed 20 October 2015.
  53. van Staden, R. (2014). Climate change. Implications for cities. Key findings from the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Fifth assessment report. http://www.cisl.cam.ac.uk/business-action/low-carbon-transformation/ipcc-briefings/pdfs/briefings/IPCC_AR5_Implications_for_Cities__Briefing__WEB_EN.pdf/view. Accessed 20 January 2016.
  54. Wamsler, C. (2014). Cities, disaster risk and adaptation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. White, G., Kates, R. W., & Burton, I. (2001). Knowing better and losing even more: The use of knowledge. hazards management. Global Environmental Change, Part B: Environmental Hazards, 3(3–4), 81–92. doi: 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00021-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilkinson, C. (2012). Social-ecological resilience: Insights and issues for planning theory. Planning Theory, 11(2), 148–169. doi: 10.1177/1473095211426274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architecture and Industrial Design Abbey of San Lorenzo in SeptimumUniversity of Campania Luigi VanvitelliAversa (CE)Italy
  2. 2.NaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations