Advertisement

Populism and the Welfare State: Why Some Latin American Countries Produce Cycles Instead of Stability

  • Achim Kemmerling
Chapter
Part of the Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie book series (JAHAEN)

Abstract

Populist politics and demand for nationalization are a recurrent phenomenon in many Latin American countries. Compared to the ‘European’ (welfare) state with its moderate tax-based redistribution, many Latin American countries have cycled between right-wing governments pursuing radical privatization and left-wing governments pursuing nationalization of many sectors. Why do we see these cycles with seemingly little middle ground? This paper argues that the root of this phenomenon lies in a political conflict between the Left and the Right in the absence of a credible commitment device: The Left can only develop welfare-state policies of redistribution with a minimum degree of state capacity such as an effective tax administration; the Right would only help establishing such an administration if they do not fear radical redistribution. With trust lacking between both sides, many Latin American countries end up in a political impasse where the Right shifts to a neoliberal, small state, whereas the Left shifts to a populist nationalization state. To bolster this argument, I construct a simple model of (in-)complete information with two ideal-type political parties. Its key result is that if the (moderate) Right is unsure about the Left’s motives it will deviate from its first preference, a strong state. As a consequence, the (moderate) Left also deviates from its preferred tax-based redistribution and the state ends up in an antagonistic equilibrium: the privatization vs. nationalization cycle. Anecdotal historical evidence shows some examples of Latin American countries that became trapped in such an antagonistic constellation which led to cycles instead of stability.

Keywords

Policy instability Populism Latin America Privatization Nationalization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Graciela Bensusan, Ilan Bizberg and several of his colleagues at the Colegio de Mexico Santiago Cariboni, Luicy Pedroza, the members of a panel at MPSA 2011 in Chicago as well as the members of the Political Economy Research group. Most importantly, I would like to thank two anonymous reviewers and Eric Linhart for their meticulous and extremely helpful reviews.

References

  1. Abts, Koen, and Stefan Rummens. 2007. Populism versus Democracy. Political Studies 55 (2): 405–424.Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. 2005. Political Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  4. Alesina, Alberto, Edward Glaeser, and Bruce Sacerdote. 2001. Why Doesn’t the US Have a European-Style Welfare System? (HIER Discussion Paper No. 1933). Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, Andy. 2003. Why is Trade Reform so Popular in Latin America? A Consumption-Based Theory of Trade Policy Preferences. World Politics 55: 423–455.Google Scholar
  6. Baldwin, Peter. 1990. The Politics of Social Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Basurto, Jorge. 1999. Populism in Mexico: From Cárdenas to Cuauhtémoc. In Populism in Latin America, ed. Michael L. Conniff. 75–96. Tuscaloosa and London: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  8. Boeri, Tito, Guiseppe Bertola, Herbert Brücker, Fabrizio Coricelli, et al. 2002. Who’s Afraid of the Big Enlargement? Economic and Social Implications of the European Union’s Prospective Eastern Expansion (CEPR Policy Paper No. 7). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
  9. Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brooks, Sarah. 2002. Social Protection and Economic Integration. Comparative Political Studies 35 (5): 491–523.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, David S., and Wendy Hunter. 1999. Democracy and Social Spending in Latin America, 1980–92. American Political Science Review 93 (4): 779–790.Google Scholar
  12. Bulmer Thomas, Victor. 2003. The Economic History of Latin America since Independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Canovan, Margaret. 1999. Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies 47 (1): 2–16.Google Scholar
  14. Centeno, Miguel A. 1997. Blood and Debt: War and Taxation in Nineteenth-Century Latin America. American Sociological Review 102 (6): 1565–1605.Google Scholar
  15. Coppedge, Michael. 1998. The Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party Systems. Party Politics 4 (4): 547–568.Google Scholar
  16. Dornbusch, Rudiger, and Sebastian Edwards. 1989. Macroeconomic Populism in Latin America. (NBER Working Paper Series No. 2986). Cambridge: The National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  17. Dornbusch, Rudiger, and Sebastian Edwards, eds. 1992. The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Doyle, David. 2014. The Political Economy of Policy Volatility in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society 56 (4): 1–22.Google Scholar
  19. ECLAC. 2007. Social Panorama of Latin America. Santiago de Chile: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. Flora, Peter, and Arnold J. Heidenheimer (eds). 1981. The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America. New Brunswick and London: Transaction.Google Scholar
  22. García Márquez, Gabriel. 1967. Cien años de soledad. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
  23. Glyn, Andrew, and Stewart Wood. 2001. Economic Policy under New Labour: How Social Democratic is the Blair Government? The Political Quarterly 72 (1): 50–66.Google Scholar
  24. Gough, Ian, and Geof Wood. 2004. Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Greif, Avner, and David D. Laitin. 2004. A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change. American Political Science Review 98 (4): 633–652.Google Scholar
  26. Haggard, Stephan, and Robert R. Kaufmann. 2008. Development, Democracy, and Welfare States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Halperín Donghi, Tulio. 1998. Historia contemporánea de América Latina. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
  28. Hart, Austin. 2010. Death of the Partisan? Globalization and Taxation in South America, 1990–2006. Comparative Political Studies 43 (3): 304–328.Google Scholar
  29. Hirschman, Albert O. 1968. The Political Economy of Import-Substituting Industrialization in Latin America. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 82 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar
  30. Huber, Evelyne, Francois Nielsen, Jenny Pribble, and John D. Stephens. 2006. Politics and Inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean. American Sociological Review 71: 943–963.Google Scholar
  31. Iversen, Torben, and David Soskice. 2006. Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others. American Political Science Review 100 (2): 165–181.Google Scholar
  32. Kemmerling, Achim. 2009. Taxing the Working Poor. The Political Origins and Economic Consequences of Taxing Low Wages. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  33. Kemmerling, Achim, and Kristin Makszin. forthcoming. When does Policy Diffusion Affect Policy Instability? Cases of Excessive Policy Volatility in Welfare Policies in Eastern Europe. In Terminating Transitions, eds. Agnes Batory, Andrew Cartwright, and Diane Stone. Cheltenham.Google Scholar
  34. Kitschelt, Herbert, Kirth A. Hawkins, Juan P. Luna, Guillermo Rosas, and Elizabeth J. Zechmeister. 2010. Latin American Party Systems. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Korpi, Walter. 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Korpi, Walter, and Joakim Palme. 1998. The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries. American Sociological Review 63: 661–687.Google Scholar
  37. Kurtz, Marcus. 2013. Latin American State Building in Comparative Perspective: Social Foundations of Institutional Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kurtz, Marcus. 2004. The dilemmas of democracy in the open economy – Lessons from Latin America. World Politics 56 (2): 262–302.Google Scholar
  39. Lagos Cruz-Coke, Marta. 1997. Latin America’s Smiling Face. Journal of Democracy 8 (3): 125–138.Google Scholar
  40. Lieberman, Evan. 2001. National Political Community and the Politics of Income Taxation in Brazil and South Africa in the Twentieth Century. Politics & Society 29 (4): 515–555.Google Scholar
  41. Lindert, Kathy, Emmanuel Skoufias, and Joseph Shapiro. 2006. Redistributing Income to the Poor and the Rich: Public Transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean (SP Discussion Paper No. 605). Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  42. Lindert, Peter. 2004. Growing Public: Social Spending and Economic Growth since the Eighteenth Century. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lloyd Mecham, J. 1966. Church and State in Latin America: A History of Politico-Ecclesiastical Relations. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  44. Mahon, James E. 2004. Causes of Tax Reform in Latin America, 1977–95. Latin American Research Review 39 (1): 3–30.Google Scholar
  45. Mainwaring, Scott, and Timothy R. Scully (eds). 1995. Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Manow, Philip. 2009. Electoral rules, class coalitions and welfare state regimes, or how to explain Esping-Andersen with Stein Rokkan. Socio-Economic Review 7: 101–121.Google Scholar
  47. Mansfield, Edward, and Helen Milner (eds). 1997. The Political Economy of Regionalism. New York and Chichester: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Mares, Isabela. 2001. Enterprise Reorganization and Social Insurance Reform: The Development of Early Retirement in France and Germany. Governance 14 (3): 295–317.Google Scholar
  49. Mesa-Lago, Carmelo. 1997. Social Welfare Reform in the Context of Economic-Political Liberalization: Latin American Cases. World Development 25 (4): 497–517.Google Scholar
  50. Mesa-Lago, Carmelo. 2000. Market, Socialist, and Mixed Economies. Comparative Policy and Performance. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Meseguer, Covadonga. 2004. What Role for Learning? The Diffusion of Privatisation in OECD and Latin American Countries. Journal of Public Policy 24: 299–325.Google Scholar
  52. Mudde, Cas. 2004. The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39: 542–563.Google Scholar
  53. O’Brien, Patrick K. 1988. The political economy of British taxation, 1660–1815. Economic History Review 41 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar
  54. Perez Yarahuan, Gabriela. 2003. Social Programs and Electoral Competition: The Political Economy of the Mexican National Fund for Social Enterprises, 1992–2000. Paper presented to the Latin American Studies Association, Dallas, March 27–29.Google Scholar
  55. Persson, Torsten, and Guido Tabellini. 2002. Political Economics. Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  56. Pribble, Jenny. 2013. Welfare and Party Politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Putnam, Robert. 1995. Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy 6 (1): 65–78.Google Scholar
  58. Rawlings, Laura B., and Gloria M. Rubio. 2005. Evaluating the Impact of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs. The World Bank Research Observer 20 (1): 29–55.Google Scholar
  59. Reid, Michael. 2007. Forgotten Continent. The Battle for Latin America’s Soul. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Roberts, Kenneth. 1995. Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America. World Politics 48: 82–116.Google Scholar
  61. Roemer, John E. 2001. Political Competition. Theory and Applications. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Rothstein, Bo. 2001. Social Capital in the Social Democratic Welfare State. Politics & Society 29 (2): 207–241.Google Scholar
  63. Rudra, Nita. 2007. Welfare States in Developing Countries: Unique or Universal? Journal of Politics 69 (2): 378–396.Google Scholar
  64. Safford, Frank. 1992. The Problem of Political Order in Early Republican Spanish America. Journal of Latin American Studies 24 (Supplement): 83–97.Google Scholar
  65. Schamis, Hector. 1999. Distributional Coalitions and the Politics of Economic Reform in Latin America. World Politics 51 (2): 236–268.Google Scholar
  66. Scharpf, Fritz W. 1997. Konsequenzen der Globalisierung für die nationale Politik. International Politics and Society (2): 184–199.Google Scholar
  67. Segura-Ubiergo, Alex. 2007. The Political Economy of the Welfare State in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Sinn, Hans-Werner. 1995. A Theory of the Welfare State. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 97 (4): 495–526.Google Scholar
  69. Sokoloff, Kenneth L., and Stanley L. Engermann. 2000. History Lessons: Institutions, Factor Endowments, and Paths of Development in the New World. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (3): 217–232.Google Scholar
  70. Stein, Steven. 1999. Paths to Populism in Peru. In Populism in Latin America, ed. Michael L. Conniff. Tuscaloosa and London: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  71. Stepan, Alfred, and Cindy Skach. 1993. Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation: Parliamentarianism versus presidentialism. World Politics 46 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
  72. Thies, Cameron G. 2005. War, Rivalry, and State Building in Latin America. American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 451–465.Google Scholar
  73. Tilly, Charles. 1975. The Formation of Nation States in Western Europe. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  74. van Kersbergen, Kees. 1995. Social Capitalism. A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Wantchekon, Leonard. 2003. Clientelism and Voting Behaviour. Evidence from a Field Experiment in Benin. World Politics 55: 399–422.Google Scholar
  76. Weingast, Barry R. 1995. The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 11 (1): 1–31.Google Scholar
  77. Weyland, Kurt. 2001. Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics 34 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
  78. Weyland, Kurt. 2002. The Politics of Market Reform in Fragile Democracies. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Whitehead, Laurence. 2010. Latin America. A New Interpretation. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  80. Williamson, Edwin. 1992. The Penguin History of Latin America. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public PolicyCentral European University BudapestBudapestUngarn

Personalised recommendations