Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risiko-Governance

Ein neuer Ansatz zur Analyse und zum Management komplexer Risiken

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Einstellungen und Verhalten in der empirischen Sozialforschung

Zusammenfassung

Das Konzept der Risiko Governance beschreibt einen integrativen Ansatz zum Umgang mit Risiken, insbesondere wenn diese als simpel, komplex, unsicher oder mehrdeutig beschrieben werden können. Das Konzept fügt zusammen was zuvor meist getrennt betrachtet wurde, insbesondere das Risiko Management, die Risikokommunikation sowie das Risiko Assessment. Nach einer Einführung in die Risikowahrnehmung und der Darstellung des Bedarfs eines integrativen Ansatzes der Risiko Governance wird der Ansatz selbst dargestellt. Dabei wird insbesondere auf die Phasen des Pre-Assessment, Risk Appraisal, Risk Evaluation and Characterization, Risk Management und Risikokommunikation eingegangen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Aven, Terje und Ortwin Renn. 2010. Risk Management and Governance. Concepts, Guidelines and Applications. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banse, Gerhard. 1996. Herkunft und Anspruch der Risikoforschung. In Risikoforschung zwischen Disziplinarität und Interdisziplinarität. Von der Illusion der Sicherheit zum Umgang mit Unsicherheit, Hrsg. G. Banse, 15–27. Berlin: Edition Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. 1986. Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in einer andere Moderne. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. 1994. The Reinvention of Politics: Towards a Theory of Reflexive Modernization. In Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Hrsg. U. Beck, A. Giddens und S. Lash, 1–55. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. 1999. World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich und Grande, Edgar. 2004. Das kosmopolitische Europa. Gesellschaft und Politik in der zweiten Moderne. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L. und Thomas Luckmann. 2004. Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. 20. Aufl. Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonß, Wolfgang. 1996. Die Rückkehr der Unsicherheit. Zur gesellschaftstheoretischen Bedeutung des Risikobegriffs. In Risikoforschung zwischen Disziplinarität und Interdisziplinarität. Von der Illusion der Sicherheit zum Umgang mit Unsicherheit, Hrsg. Gerhard Banse, 166–184. Berlin: Edition Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Lee. 1989. Acceptable Risk: Making Decisions in a Toxic Environment. Berkeley: University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Mary. 1990. Risk as a Forensic Resource. Daedalus 119 (4): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Mary und Aaron Wildavsky. 1982. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenführ, Franz und Martin Weber. 1993. Rationales Entscheiden. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald, Francois. 1993. Der Vorsorgestaat. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, Baruch. 1985. Managing Risk Perceptions. Issues in Science and Technology 2 (1): 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, Baruch. 1995. Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: Twenty Years of Process. Risk Analysis 15 (2): 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, John D. und Rhomberg, Lorenz. 1996. How Risks are Identified and Assessed. In Challenges in Risk Assessment and Risk Management, Hrsg. Howard Kunreuther, und Paul Slovic, 14–24. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannigan, John A. 1995. Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Perspective. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattis, Dale. 2004. The Conception of Variability in Risk Analyses: Developments Since 1980. In Risk Analysis and Society. An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field, Hrsg. Timothy McDaniels, und Mitchell J. Small, 15–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HSE. 2001. Reducing Risk – Protecting People. London: Health and Safety Executive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horlick-Jones, Tom und Jonathan Sine. 2004: Living on the Border: Knowledge, Risk and Transdisciplinarity. Futures 36: 441–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA. 1995. Guidelines for Integrated Risk Assessment and Management in Large Industrial Areas. Technical Document: IAEA-TECDOC PGVI-CIJV. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEC. 1993. Guidelines for Risk Analysis of Technological Systems. Report IEC-CD (Sec) 381 issued by the Technical Committee QMS/23. Brussels: European Community.

    Google Scholar 

  • IRGC. 2005. Risk Governance: Towards an Integrative Approach. White Paper No. 1, O. Renn with an Annex by P. Graham. Geneva: IRGC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, Sheila. 1999. The Songlines of Risk. Environmental Values. Special Issue: Risk 8 (2): 135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, Sheila. 2004. Ordering Knowledge, Ordering Society. In States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, Hrsg. Sheila Jasanoff, 31–54. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, Carlo C., Renn, Ortwin, Rosa, Eugene A. und Thomas Webler. 2001. Risk, Uncertainty and Rational Action. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinke, Andreas und Ortwin Renn. 2002. A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management: Risk-Based, Precaution-Based and Discourse-Based Management. Risk Analysis 22 (6): 1071–1094.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinke, Andreas und Ortwin Renn. 2012. Adaptive and Integrative Governance on Risk and Uncertainty. Journal of Risk Research 15 (3): 273–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolluru, Rao V. 1995. Risk Assessment and Management: A Unified Approach. In: Risk Assessment and Management Handbook. For Environmental, Health, and Safety Professionals, Hrsg. Rao V Kolluru, Steven M. Bartell, Robin M. Pitblado und Scott Stricoff, Kapitel 1.3–1.41. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, Lester B. 1987. Health and Safety Risk Analyses: Information for Better Decisions. Science 236: 291–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour M. und William Schneider. 1983. The Confidence Gap, Business, Labor, and Government in the Public Mind. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfstedt, Ragnar E. 1997. Risk Evaluation in the United Kingdom: Legal Requirements, Conceptual Foundations, and Practical Experiences with Special Emphasis on Energy Systems. Working Paper No. 92. Stuttgart: Akademie für Technikfolgenabschätzung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfstedt, Ragnar E. 2005. Risk Management in Post-Trust Societies. New York: Pallgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1986. Ökologische Kommunikation. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1990. Technology, Environment, and Social Risk: A Systems Perspective. Industrial Crisis Quarterly 4 (3): 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1997. Grenzwerte der ökologischen Politik. Eine Form von Risikomanagement. In Risiko und Regulierung. Soziologische Beiträge zu Technikkontrolle und präventiver Umweltpolitik, Hrsg. Petra Hiller und Georg Krücken, 195–221. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2003. Emerging Systemic Risks. Final Report to the OECD Futures Project. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Hans Peter. 1999. Das Bedürfnis nach Kontrolle der Gentechnik und das Vertrauen in wissenschaftliche Experten. In Gentechnik in der Öffentlichkeit. Wahrnehmung und Bewertung einer umstrittenen Technologie, Hrsg. Jürgen Hampel und Ortwin Renn, 225–245. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, Richard E. und John T. Cacioppo. 1986. The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19: 123–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, Steve und Robin Cantor. 1987. How Fair is Safe Enough? The Cultural Approach to Societal Technology Choice. Risk Analysis 7 (1): 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, Ortwin. 2006. Risk Communication – Consumers between Information and Irritation. Journal of Risk Research 9 (8): 833–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, Ortwin. 2008a. Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, Ortwin. 2008b. Concepts of Risk. GAIA Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, Part 1, 17 (1): 50–66; Part II: 17 (2): 196–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, Ortwin und Florian Keil. 2009. Was ist das Systemische an systemischen Risiken? GAIA Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 18 (2): 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, Ortwin und Levine, Debra. 1991. Trust and Credibility in Risk Communication. In Communicating Risk to the Public, Hrsg. Roger E.Kasperson und Pieter J. Stallen, 51–81. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, Ortwin, Klinke, Andreas und van Asselt, Marjolein B. A. 2011. Coping with Complexity, Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Risk Governance: A Synthesis. AMBIO 40 (2): 231–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, Ortwin und Roco, Michael. 2006. Nanotechnology and the Need for Risk Governance. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 8 (2–3): 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, Ortwin und Pia-Johanna Schweizer. 2009. Inclusive Risk Governance: Concepts and Application to Environmental Policy Making. Environmental Policy and Governance 19: 174–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, Ortwin, Schweizer, Pia-Johanna, Dreyer, Marion und Andreas Klinke. 2007. Risiko: Über den gesellschaftlichen Umgang mit Unsicherheit. München: Oekom Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, Ortwin und Piet Sellke. 2011. Risk, Society and Policy Making: Risk Governance in a Complex World. International Journal of Performability Engineering 7 (4): 349–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, Ortwin und Katherine Walker (Hrsg.) 2008. Global Risk Governance. Concept and Practice Using the IRGC Framework, International Risk Governance Council Bookseries 1. Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • RISKO. 2000. Mitteilungen für die Kommission für Risikobewertung des Kantons Basel-Stadt: Seit 10 Jahren beurteilt die RISKO die Tragbarkeit von Risiken. Bulletin 3: 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann, Bernd und Ortwin Renn. 2000. Risk Perception Research: An Introduction. In Cross-Cultural Risk Perception. A Survey of Empirical Studies, Hrsg. Ortwin Renn und Bernd Rohrmann, 11–54. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, Eugene A. 1998. Metatheoretical Foundations for Post-Normal Risk. Journal of Risk Research 1 (1): 15–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellke, Piet und Renn, Ortwin. 2011. Risiko-Governance in einer komplexen Welt. In Handbuch Umweltsoziologie, Hrsg. M Gross, 503–528. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, Martin. 1991. Risk, Society, Politicians, Scientists, and People. In Risk, Organizations, and Society, Hrsg. Martin Shubik, 7–30. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, Paul. 1992. Perception of Risk: Reflections on the Psychometric Paradigm. In Theories of Risk, Hrsg. Dominic Golding und Sheldon Krimsky, 117–152. London: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, Paul, Fischhoff, Baruch und Sarah Lichtenstein. 1981. Perceived Risk: Psychological Factors and Social Implications. In Proceedings of the Royal Society, Hrsg. Royal Society Report A376, 17–34. London: Royal Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Paul C. und Harvey V. Fineberg. 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. National Research Council. Committee on Risk Characterization. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, Andy. 2003. Risk, Uncertainty and Precaution: Some Instrumental Implications from the Social Sciences. In Negotiating Environmental Change: New Perspectives from Social Science, Hrsg. Frans Berkhout, Melissa Leach und Ian Scoones, 33–76. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stricoff, Scott. 1995. Safety Risk Analysis and Process Safety Management: Principles and Practices. In Risk Assessment and Management Handbook. For Environmental, Health, and Safety Professionals, Hrsg. Rao V. Kolluru, Steven M. Bartell, Robin M. Piblado, und Scott Stricoff, 8.3 – 8.53, New York: Mc-Graw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Michael, Ellis, Richard und Aaron Wildavsky. 1990. Cultural Theory. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • US-EPA Environmental Protection Agency. 1997. Exposure Factors Handbook. NTIS PB98–124217. Washington: EPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • US-National Research Council of the National Academies. 2008. Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Asselt, Marjolein B.A. und Ortwin Renn. 2011. Risk Governance. Journal of Risk Research 1 (4): 431–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU (Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen). 2000. World in Transition: Strategies for Managing Global Environmental Risks. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, Brian. 1992. Uncertainty and Environmental Learning: Reconceiving Science and Policy in the Preventive Paradigm. Global Environmental Change 12 (2): 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, Jens und Peter Taylor-Gooby. 2006. Risk as an Interdisciplinary Research Area: In Risk in Social Science, Hrsg. Peter Taylor-Gooby und Jens Zinn, 20–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Esslingen, Deutschland

    Piet Sellke

  2. Potsdam, Deutschland

    Ortwin Renn

Authors
  1. Piet Sellke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ortwin Renn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piet Sellke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany

    Jochen Mayerl

  2. Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany

    Thomas Krause

  3. Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany

    Andreas Wahl

  4. Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Marius Wuketich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sellke, P., Renn, O. (2019). Risiko-Governance. In: Mayerl, J., Krause, T., Wahl, A., Wuketich, M. (eds) Einstellungen und Verhalten in der empirischen Sozialforschung . Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16348-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16348-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-16347-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-16348-8

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation