Advertisement

Terrorismusbekämpfung und die Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention

  • Sebastian Wolf
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag untersucht die Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte zur Vereinbarkeit staatlicher Maßnahmen zur Terrorismusbekämpfung mit den in der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention gewährleisteten Menschenrechten und Grundfreiheiten. Beschwerden gegen europäische Staaten wegen Menschenrechtsverletzungen mit Terrorismusbezug haben in den letzten Jahren stark an Bedeutung hinzugewonnen. Im Rahmen einer hypothesengenerierenden Studie werden acht Annahmen herausgearbeitet. Eine kontinuierlich zunehmende Aushöhlung von Grundrechten durch Antiterrormaßnahmen kann im Rahmen der explorativen Analyse nicht festgestellt werden. Der Gerichtshof akzeptiert das Ziel der Terrorismuseindämmung in der Regel als Begründung für Grundrechtsbeschränkungen, untersucht aber im Einzelfall unter Würdigung der jeweiligen Umstände, ob der Eingriff noch angemessen oder bereits unverhältnismäßig ist.

Literatur

  1. Blatter, Joachim, und Markus Haverland. 2012. Designing case studies. Explanatory approaches in small-N research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Breuer, Marten. 2013. Zulässigkeit und Grenzen richterlicher Rechtsfortbildung in der Rechtsprechung des EGMR. Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 68:729–766.Google Scholar
  3. Brummer, Klaus. 2008. Der Europarat. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Christoffersen, Jonas, und Mikael R. Madsen, Hrsg. 2013. The European Court of Human Rights between law and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cichowski, Rachel A. 2013. Civil society and the European Court of Human Rights. In The European Court of Human Rights between law and politics, Hrsg. Jonas Christoffersen und Mikael R. Madsen, 77–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Die Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention. 2010. Die Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention in der Fassung der Protokolle Nr. 11 und 14 samt Zusatzprotokoll und Protokolle Nr. 4, 6, 7, 12 und 13. http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_DEU.pdf. Zugegriffen: 8. Mai 2016.
  7. EGMR (Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte). 2015. ECHR overview 1959–2014. http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Overview_19592014_ENG.pdf. Zugegriffen: 8. Mai 2016.
  8. EGMR (Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte). 2016. Factsheet terrorism and the ECHR, Stand Januar 2016. http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/FS_Terrorism_ENG.pdf. Zugegriffen: 31. Jan. 2016.
  9. George, Alexander L., und Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gerring, John. 2004. What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review 98:341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mowbray, Alastair R. 2012. Cases, materials, and commentary on the European Convention on Human Rights, 3. Aufl. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Neskovic, Wolfgang, Hrsg. 2015. Der CIA-Folterreport. Der offizielle Bericht des US-Senats zum Internierungs- und Verhörprogramm der CIA. Frankfurt a. M.: Westend.Google Scholar
  13. Sadurski, Wojciech. 2009. Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the accession of Central and East European states to the Council of Europe, and the idea of pilot judgments. Human Rights Law Review 9:397–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stone Sweet, Alec, und Helen Keller. 2008. The reception of the ECHR in national legal orders. In: A Europe of rights. The impact of the ECHR on national legal systems, Hrsg. Helen Keller und Alec Stone Sweet, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Voeten, Erik. 2008. The impartiality of international judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights. American Political Science Review 102:417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Voeten, Erik. 2013. Politics, judicial behaviour, and institutional design. In The European Court of Human Rights between law and politics, Hrsg. Jonas Christoffersen und Mikael R. Madsen, 61–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Wolf, Sebastian. 2016. Zur Interpretationsoffenheit europäischer Grundrechte. Sondervoten und Abstimmungsverhalten im Europäischen Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte. In Politik und Recht. Umrisse eines politikwissenschaftlichen Forschungsfeldes, Hrsg. Roland Lhotta, Oliver Lembcke und Verena Frick. Baden-Baden: Nomos (im Druck).Google Scholar

Urteile und Entscheidungen12

  1. A. and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 3455/05, 19 February 2009.Google Scholar
  2. Abdulla Ali v. the United Kingdom, no. 30971/12, 30 June 2015.Google Scholar
  3. Aksoy v. Turkey, no. 21987/93, 18 December 1996.Google Scholar
  4. Al Nashiri v. Poland, no. 28761/11, 24 July 2014.Google Scholar
  5. Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288/98, 17 July 2001.Google Scholar
  6. Association SOS Attentats and de Boery v. France, no. 76642/01, 4 October 2006.Google Scholar
  7. Aswat v. the United Kingdom (decision), no. 62176/14, 6 January 2015.Google Scholar
  8. Aswat v. the United Kingdom (judgement), no. 17299/12, 16 April 2013.Google Scholar
  9. Ataun Rojo v. Spain, no. 3344/13, 7 October 2014.Google Scholar
  10. Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 24027/07, 11949/08, 36742/08, 66911/09 and 67354/09, 10 April 2012.Google Scholar
  11. Beghal v. France, no. 27778/09, 6 September 2011.Google Scholar
  12. Belek and Velioglu v. Turkey, no. 44227/04, 6 October 2015.Google Scholar
  13. Ben Khemais v. Italy, no. 246/07, 24 February 2009.Google Scholar
  14. Berasategi v. France, no. 29095/09, 26 January 2012.Google Scholar
  15. Bidart v. France, no. 52363/11, 12 November 2015.Google Scholar
  16. Brannigan and McBride v. the United Kingdom, nos. 14553/89, 14554/89, 25 May 1993.Google Scholar
  17. Brind v. the United Kingdom (Commission), no. 18714/91, 9 May 1994.Google Scholar
  18. Brogan and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 11209/84, 11234/84, 11266/84, 11386/85, 29 November 1988.Google Scholar
  19. Chahal v. the United Kingdom, no. 22414/93, 15 November 1996.Google Scholar
  20. Daoudi v. France, no. 19576/08, 3 December 2009.Google Scholar
  21. Del Rio Prada v. Spain, no. 42750/09, 21 October 2013.Google Scholar
  22. El Haski v. Belgium, no. 649/08, 25 September 2012.Google Scholar
  23. El-Masri v. „The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia“, no. 39630/09, 13 December 2012.Google Scholar
  24. Esparza Luri v. France, no. 29119/09, 26 January 2012.Google Scholar
  25. Etxebarria Caballero v. Spain, no. 74016/12, 7 October 2014.Google Scholar
  26. Etxeberría and Others v. Spain, nos. 35579/03, 35613/03, 35626/03, 35634/03, 30 June 2009.Google Scholar
  27. Finogenov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18299/03 and 27311/03, 20 December 2011.Google Scholar
  28. Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, no. 12244/86, 12245/86, 12383/86, 30 August 1990.Google Scholar
  29. Frérot v. France, no. 70204/01, 12 June 2007.Google Scholar
  30. Gillan and Quinton v. the United Kingdom, no. 4158/05, 12 January 2010.Google Scholar
  31. Guimon Esparza v. France, no. 29116/09, 26 January 2012.Google Scholar
  32. Güler and Ugur v. Turkey, nos. 31706/10 and 33088/10, 2 December 2014.Google Scholar
  33. Heaney and McGuiness v. Ireland, nos. 15809/02 and 25624/02, 29 June 2007.Google Scholar
  34. Herri Batasuna and Batasuna v. Spain, nos. 25803/04 and 25817/04, 30 June 2009.Google Scholar
  35. Herritarren Zerrenda v. Spain, no. 43518/04, 30 June 2009.Google Scholar
  36. Husayn (Abu Zubaydah) v. Poland, no. 7511/13, 24 July 2014.Google Scholar
  37. Icyer v. Turkey, no. 18888/02, 12 January 2006.Google Scholar
  38. Ireland v. the United Kingdom, no. 5310/71, 18 January 1978.Google Scholar
  39. Klass and Others v. Germany, no. 5029/71, 6 September 1978.Google Scholar
  40. Labsi v. Slovakia, no. 33809/08, 15 May 2012.Google Scholar
  41. Lawless v. Ireland, no. 332/57, 1 July 1961.Google Scholar
  42. Leroy v. France, no. 36109/03, 2 October 2008.Google Scholar
  43. M. S. v. Belgium, no. 50012/08, 31 January 2012.Google Scholar
  44. Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey, nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, 4 February 2005.Google Scholar
  45. Martinez Sala v. Spain, no. 58438/00, 2 November 2004.Google Scholar
  46. McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 18984/91, 27 September 1995.Google Scholar
  47. Müdür Duman v. Turkey, no. 15450/03, 6 October 2015.Google Scholar
  48. Murray v. the United Kingdom, no. 14310/88, 28 October 1994.Google Scholar
  49. Nada v. Switzerland, no. 10593/08, 12 September 2012.Google Scholar
  50. O’Hara v. the United Kingdom, no. 37555/97, 16 October 2001.Google Scholar
  51. Öcalan v. Turkey, no. 46221/99, 12 May 2005.Google Scholar
  52. Öcalan v. Turkey (no. 2), nos. 24069/03, 197/04, 6201/06 and 10464/07, 18 March 2014.Google Scholar
  53. Omar Othman v. the United Kingdom, no. 8139/09, 17 January 2012.Google Scholar
  54. Purcell and Others v. Ireland (Commission), no. 15404/89, 16 April 1991.Google Scholar
  55. Ramirez Sanchez v. France, no. 59450/00, 4 July 2006.Google Scholar
  56. Saadi v. Italy, no. 37201/06, 28 February 2008.Google Scholar
  57. Sabanchiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 38450/05, 6 June 2013.Google Scholar
  58. Sagarzazu v. France, no. 29109/09, 26 January 2012.Google Scholar
  59. Salduz v. Turkey, no. 36391/02, 27 November 2008.Google Scholar
  60. Saygili and Falakaoglu v. Turkey, no. 39457/03, 21 October 2008.Google Scholar
  61. Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, 12 April 2005.Google Scholar
  62. Sher and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 5201/11, 20 October 2015.Google Scholar
  63. Soria Valderrama v. France, no. 29101/09, 26 January 2012.Google Scholar
  64. Szabó and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138/14, 12 January 2016.Google Scholar
  65. Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140/10, 4 September 2014.Google Scholar
  66. United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, no. 19392/92, 30 January 1998.Google Scholar
  67. Ürper and Others v. Turkey, nos. 14526/07, 14747/07, 15022/07, 15737/07, 36137/07, 47245/07, 50371/07, 50372/07 and 54637/07, 20 October 2009.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.KonstanzDeutschland

Personalised recommendations