Skip to main content

Missing the Big Picture on State-Owned Enterprises: Quality of Aggregate Holdings Reporting of Public Administrations and Reform Implications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: NPO-Management ((NPOM))

Abstract

In the context of current debates on sustainable public service provision, austerity, debts, and cutback management, the governance and management of and in State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) is imbued with special relevance. An aggregate holdings report (AHR) is an important tool for public administrations to provide accountability for SOEs and the necessary overview of the institutional structures of the core administration and SOEs. This study analyses the quality of AHR in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland on the basis of a quality model with 175 criteria. Findings show that public administrations in many cases do not meet the identical requirements from theory and practice. Laws on AHR are necessary to ensure the realization of policy goals. First, the study provides a conceptual contribution for assessing AHR and for future research on the issues of the model categories. Second, empirical insight into quality patterns of AHR is provided. The model enables one to answer questions which are often raised in the reform debates, such as, “which AHR can I use as a reference to further develop my own AHR?” The study offers valuable new insights which can enhance sustainable management and control of SOEs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bertelsmann Foundation (2008), Municipal Finance and Debt Report – A Federal Country Comparison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann Foundation (2013), Municipal Finance Report – Income, Spending and Indebtedness in Federal Country Comparison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, Tony and Elke Löffler (2003), Evaluating the Quality of Public Governance: Indicators, Models and Methodologies, in: International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 313-328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, Marc (2010), Two concepts of accountability: Accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism, in: West European Politics, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 946-967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, Garry D., Mike W. Peng, David Ahlstrom, Ciprian Stan and Kehan Xu (2015), State-owned enterprises around the world as hybrid organizations, in: Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 92–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, John M (2004), What to do When Stakeholders Matter. Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques, in: Public Management Review, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 21-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, Philip (1992), Quality is Free. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, James H., David Schoorman and Lex Donaldson (1997), Toward a Stewardship theory of management, in: Academy of Management Review, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 20-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, Harold (1967), Toward a theory of property rights, in: The American Economic Review, pp. 57, no. 2, pp. 347-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Thomas and Lee E Preston (1995), The Stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications, in: Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 65-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009), Commission recommendation 2009/385/EC complementing recommendations 2004/913/EC and 2005/162/EC as regards the regime for the remuneration of directors of listed companies.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011), The EU corporate governance framework COM 164 final. Green Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2012), Directive proposal COM/2012/614 on improving the gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges and related measure.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and the Council (2006a), Directive 2006/54/EC on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and the Council (2006b), Directive 2006/43/EC on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and the Council (2014a), Directive 2014/95/EU amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups. Official Journal of the European Union L 330/1.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and the Council (2014b), Regulation 537/2014/ on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities and repealing Commission Decision 2005/909/EC. Official Journal of the European Union L 158/77.

    Google Scholar 

  • German Federation (2009), Public Corporate Governance Code of the Federation, English version, www.bundesfinanzministerium.de (accessed: 24.02.2016).

  • Grossi, Guiseppe, Ulf Papenfuß and Marie-Soleil Tremblay (2015), Corporate governance and accountability of state-owned enterprises: Relevance for science and society and interdisciplinary research perspectives, in: International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 274-285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, Ron, Mike Wright and Kevin Keasy (1996), Corporate governance in the public services: Concepts and issues, in: Public Money and Management, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 34-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organisation for Standardization (ISO) (2015), ISO 9000:2015, Quality Management Systems, https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9000:ed-4:v1:en (accessed: 16.02.2015).

  • Jung, Chan S. (2014), Why are goals important in the public sector? Exploring the benefits of goal clarity for reducing turnover intention, in: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 209-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran, Joseph (1988), Juran’s Quality Control Handbook. 4th ed., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein Peter G., Joseph T. Mahoney, Anita M. McGahan and Christos N. Pitelis (2012), Who is in Charge? A Property Rights Perspective on Stakeholder Governance, in: Strategic Organization, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 304-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, Myungjung, Frances S. Berry and Hee S. Jang (2013), A Theoretical Framework on the Determinants of Strategic Cities: Empirical Results From Florida City Governments, in: The American Review of Public Administration, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 438-459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millward, Robert (2011), Public enterprise in the modern western world: An historical analysis, in: Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 375-398.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2015), OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, Steven P. (2014), A Sustainable Business Model for Public Service Organizations?, in: Public Management Review, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 165-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papenfuß, Ulf (2014), How (should) public authorities report on stateowned enterprises for financial sustainability and cutback management - A new quality model, in: Public Money & Management, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 115-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, Kuno and Isabella Proeller (2010), Outcome-Oriented Public Management: A Responsibility-Based Approach to the New Public Management. Charlotte, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tricker, Robert Ian (2012), Corporate Governance: Principles, Policies and Practices. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Slyke, David M. (2007), Agents or Stewards: Using Theory to Understand the Government-Nonprofit Social Service Contracting Relationship, in: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 157-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoest, Koen, Sandra van Thiel, Geert Bouckaert and Per Laegreid (2012), Lessons and Recommendations for the Practice of Agencification, in: Government Agencies: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries, ed. By Koen Verhoest, Sandra van Thiel, Geert Bouckaert and Per Lægreid, Houndmills, pp. 413-439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whincop, Michael J (2005), Corporate Governance in Government Corporations. Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Simon (2004), Improving corporate governance in SOEs: An integrated approach, in: Corporate Governance International, vol. 7, no.2, pp. 5-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2014), Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises: A Toolkit. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulf Papenfuß .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Papenfuß, U., Steinhauer, L., Friedländer, B. (2017). Missing the Big Picture on State-Owned Enterprises: Quality of Aggregate Holdings Reporting of Public Administrations and Reform Implications. In: Andeßner, R., Greiling, D., Vogel, R. (eds) Public Sector Management in a Globalized World. NPO-Management. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16112-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16112-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-16111-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-16112-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics