Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Demokratie, Diktatur, Gerechtigkeit pp 619–644Cite as

Wie der Autoritarismus in einem Zeitalter der Demokratisierung bestehen bleibt

Zu den kulturellen Wurzeln seines Andauerns im demokratischen Ostasien

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Warum bleiben so viele Bürger neuer Demokratien auch nach Jahrzehnten demokratischer Herrschaft dem Erbe der autoritären Vergangenheit fest verbunden? Tun sie dies aufgrund der besonderen Art der Kultur, die sie tagtäglich leben? Wenn Kultur so wesentlich ist, formt sie dann die Unterstützung der Bürger für autoritäre Staatsführung direkt oder indirekt? Ich möchte diesen Fragen anhand der jüngsten dritten Welle der „Asian Barometer Surveys“ nachgehen, die in sechs ostasiatischen Demokratien durchgeführt worden ist. Eine vorläufige Analyse dieser Umfragen bestätigt die Douglas-Wildavsky-Theorie, die die Kultur des hierarchischen Kollektivismus mit der Affinität für autoritäre Staatsführung in Zusammenhang bringt. Darüber hinaus zeigt die Analyse, dass diese Kultur die Ostasiaten motiviert, ihre Regime als schlecht funktionierende Demokratien wahrzunehmen. Diese Wahrnehmungen wiederum orientieren sie in Richtung autoritären Regierens. Dieser kritische Befund, dass hierarchische Kultur die Bindung an die autoritäre Vergangenheit direkt und indirekt prägt, weist auf eine neue Kulturtheorie eines widerstandsfähigen Autoritarismus in postautoritären Gesellschaften hin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Ambrosio, Thomas. 2014. Beyond the Transition Paradigm: A Research Agenda for Authoritarian Consolidation. Demokratizatsiya 22 (3): 471-494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Art, David. 2012. Review Article: What Do We Know about Authoritarianism After Ten Years? Comparative Politics: 351-373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azpuru, Dinorah. 2011. Lingering Authoritarian Attitudes in Latin America: Support for the Caudillo\ Rule. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association held in Seattle, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel A. 2008. China’s New Confucianism: Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel A. 2015. The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brancati, Dawn. 2014. Democratic Authoritarianism: Origins and Effects. Annual Review of Political Science 17: 313-326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, Jason. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, Mathew und Maria Stephan. Hrsg. 2015. Is Authoritarianism Staging a Comeback? Washington, DC: The Atlantic Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Yu-chung, Yun-han chu und Chong-min Park. 2010. Authoritarian Nostalgia in Asia. Journal of Democracy 18 (3): 66-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, Yun-han, Larry Diamond, Andrew Nathan und Doh Chull Shin. Hrsg. 2008. How East Asians View Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confucius. [1979]. The Analects. Translated by D. C. Lau. New York, NY: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confucius. Comp. 2014. The Book of Rites. Translated by James Legge. Carmel, CA: Lionshare Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, David. Hrsg. 1979. The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, Alexander. 2015. Authoritarianism Goes Global. Journal of Democracy 26 (3): 49-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croissant, Aurel und Stefan Wurster. 2013. Performance and Persistence of Autocracies in Comparison: Introducing Issues and Perspectives. Contemporary Politics 19 (1): 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. 1991. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Russell J. und Dhu-Ngoc Ong. 2005. Authority Orientations and Democratic Attitudes: A Test of the ‘Asian Values’ Hypothesis. Japanese Journal of Political Science 6 (2): 1-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Russell J. und Christian Welzel. Hrsg. 2014. The Civic Culture Transformed. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denemark, David, Robert Mattes und Richard Niemi. Hrsg. 2016. Growing Up Democratic: Generational Change in Post-Authoritarian Societies. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry. 2008. The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies Throughout the World. New York: Times Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry. 2013. Why Wait for Democracy? The Wilson Quarterly (winter). Online unter http://wilsonquarterly.com/stories/why-wait-for-democracy/, Zugriff am 15.05.2016.

  • Economist Intelligence Unit. 2015. Democracy Index 2014 Democracy and Its Discontents. Online unter www.sudestada.com.uy/Content/Articles/, Zugriff am 15.05.2016.

  • Freedom House. 2008. Philippines. Online unter https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2008/philippines#.Vb6VRvNViko, Zugriff am 15.05.2016.

  • Freedom House. 2015a. List of Electoral Democracies. Online unter https://freedomhouse.org/report-types/freedom-world#.VdO-RrJViko, Zugriff am 15.05.2016.

  • Freedom House. 2015b. Nations in Transit 2015. Online unter https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/nations-transit-2015#.VdSrQLJViko, Zugriff am 15.05.2016.

  • Freedom House. 2015c. Freedom in the World: Electoral Democracies. Online unter https://freedomhouse.org/, Zugriff am 15.05.2016.

  • Freedom House, Radio Free Europe and Radio Free Asia. 2009. Undermining Democracy: 21 st Century Authoritarians. New York: Freedom House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis. 1989. The End of History? The National Interest (Summer 1989): 3-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis. 2014. At the end of ‘History’ still Stands Democracy. The Wall Street Journal, 6. Juni. Online unter www.wsj.com/articles/at-the-end-of-history-still-stands-democracy-1402080661, Zugriff am 10. Juni 2016.

  • Ganbat, Damba, Rollin Tusalem und David Da-hua Yang. 2010. The Mass Public and Democratic Politics in Mongolia. In How East Asians View Democracy, hrsg. Yun-han Chu, Larry Diamond, Andrew Nathan und Doh Chull Shin, 139-160. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilley, Bruce und Larry Diamond. Hrsg. 2008. Political Change in China: Comparison with Taiwan. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göbel, Christian. 2011. Authoritarian Consolidation. European Political Science 10 (2): 176-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss, Andrew. 2015. Explaining Support for Authoritarianism in New Democracies, University of Vermont College of Arts and Sciences Honor Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, Stephen. 2006. Authoritarian Government. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, hrsg. Barry Weingast und Donald Wittman, 693-707. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadenius, Axel und Jan Teorell. 2007. Pathways from Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 18 (1): 143-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Henry E. 2011. The Myth of Mass Russian Support for Autocracy: The Public Opinion Foundation of a Hybrid Regime. Europe-Asia Studies 63 (8): 1357-1375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Anthony, Stephen Fisher und Shawna Smith. 2005. The Globalization of Public Opinion Research. Annual Review of Political Science 8: 297-333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Chun-Chieh. 2010. Humanism in the East Asian Confucian Contexts. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Min-hua. 2014. Change and the Unchanged of Polarized Politics in Taiwan. Paper präsentiert auf der Konferenz „The Politics of Polarization: Taiwan in Comparative Perspective“ am Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilization and the Remaking of the World Order. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA). 2000. Democratization in Indonesia: An Assessment. Stockholm: IDEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • James. Book of James. A.D.50. Online unter http://biblehub.com/james/2-10.htm, Zugriff am 15.05.2016.

  • Jiang, Qing. 2013. A Confucian Political Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, Kevin und Jana Warkotsch. 2011. Putting Institutions into Perspective: Two Waves of Authoritarianism Studies and the Arab Spring. Präsentiert auf der 2011 General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research, Reykjavík, Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurlantzick, Joshua. 2014. Democracy in Retreat: The Revolt of the Middle Class and the Worldwide Retreat of Representative Government. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steven und Lucan Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Chenyang. 2013. The Confucian Philosophy of Harmony. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Perry und Joshua Kurlantzick. 2009. China’s Modern Authoritarianism. Wall Street Journal Asia, 25. Mai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan J. 1964. An Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Spain, In Cleavages, Ideologies and Party Systems, hrsg. Erik Allard und Yrjo Littunen, 291-342. Helsinki: Transactions of the Westermack Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan J. 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan J. 2007. Political Regimes and the Quest for Knowledge. In Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics, hrsg. Gerardo L. Munck und Richard Snyder, 150-209. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, Carolyn. 2011. The Roots of Resilience: Exploring Popular Support for African Traditional Authorities. Afrobarometer Working Paper No. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattes, Robert. 2007. Public Opinion Research in Emerging Democracies. In The Sage Handbook of Public Opinion Research, hrsg. W. Donsbach und M. W. Traugott, 113-122. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mencius. [1970]. Mencius. Translated by D. C. Lau. New York, NY: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, Wolfgang. 2010. Are dictatorships returning? Revisiting the ‘democratic rollback’ hypothesis. Contemporary Politics 16 (1): 17-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, Andrew J. 2003. Authoritarian Resilience. Journal of Democracy 14 (1): 6-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris. Pippa. 2009. The Globalization of Comparative Public Opinion Research. In The Sage Handbook of Comparative Politics, hrsg. Todd Landman und Neil Robinson, 522-540. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puddington, Arch. 2015. Discarding Democracy: A Return to the Iron Fist. Online unter https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/01152015_FIW_2015_final.pdf, Zugriff am 14.05.2016.

  • Pye, Lucian W. 1985. Asian Power and Politics: The Cultural Dimensions of Authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Richard. 2009. Democratic and Undemocratic States. In Democratization, hrsg. Christian Haerpfer, Patrick Bernhagen, Ronald Inglehart und Christian Welzel, 10-23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Richard, William Mishler und Christian W. Haerpfer. 1998. Democracy and Its Alternatives. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Richard, William Mishler und Neil Munro. 2011. Popular Support for an Undemocratic Regime: The Changing Views of Russians. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, Yuri. 2003. Democratizing Indonesia: Refomasi Period in Historical Perspective. Institute of Developing Economics Research Paper No. 1. Chiba, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schamis, Hector. 1991. Reconceptualizing Latin America Authoritarianism in the 1970s. Comparative Politics 23 (2): 201-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, Andreas. Hrsg. 2006. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, Andreas. 2015. The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoppa, Leonard. Hrsg. 2011. The Evolution of Japan’s Party System: Politics and Policy in an Age of Institutional Reform. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, Michael. 2015. Confucius: And the World He Created. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1999. Democracy as a Universal Value. Journal of Democracy 10 (3): 3-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Doh C. 1999. Mass Politics and Culture in Democratizing Korea. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Doh C. 2008. The Third Wave in East Asia: Comparative and Dynamic Perspectives. Taiwan Journal of Democracy 4 (2): 91-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Doh C. 2012. Confucianism and Democratization in East Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Doh C. und Jason Well. 2005. Is Democracy the Only Game in Town? Journal of Democracy 16 (2): 88-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, Daniel, Benjamin G. Bishin und Robert R. Barr. 2006. Authoritarian Attitudes, Democracy, and Policy Preferences among Latin American Elites. American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 606-620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svolik, Milan W. 2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Dennis. 2010. The Democratic Citizen: Social Science and Democratic Theory in the Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahman, Michael, Jan Teorell und Axel Hadenius. 2013. Authoritarian regime types revisited: updated data in comparative perspective. Contemporary Politics 19 (1): 19-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welzel, Christian. 2013. Freedom Rising: Human Empowerment and the Quest for Emancipation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weßels, Bernhard. 2015. Political Culture, Political Satisfaction, and the Rollback of Democracy. Global Policy 6 (S1): 93-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winsor, Jennifer, Jeffrey Gedmin und Lebby Liou, 2009. Authoritarianism’s New Wave. Foreign Policy, 3. Juni. Online unter http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/06/03/authoritarianisms-new-wave/, Zugriff am 10.06.2016.

  • Woo-Cumings, Meredith. Hrsg. 1999. The Developmental State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Xinzhong. 1977. Confucianism and Christianity: A Comparative Study of Jen and Agape. Sussex: Sussex Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Xinzhong. 2001. Who is a Confucian Today? A Critical Reflection on the Issues Concerning Confucian Identity in Modern Times. Journal of Contemporary Religion 16 (3): 313-328.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California Irvine, 92697, Irvine, Ca., USA

    Prof. Dr. Doh Chull Shin

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Doh Chull Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doh Chull Shin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst.f. Polit. Wissenschaft, Ruprecht-Karls- Univ Inst.f. Polit. Wissenschaft, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Aurel Croissant

  2. Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Sascha Kneip

  3. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin , Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Alexander Petring

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shin, D.C. (2017). Wie der Autoritarismus in einem Zeitalter der Demokratisierung bestehen bleibt. In: Croissant, A., Kneip, S., Petring, A. (eds) Demokratie, Diktatur, Gerechtigkeit. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16090-6_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16090-6_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-16089-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-16090-6

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation