Zusammenfassung
Zeitgenössische autokratische Regime weichen in verschiedenen Richtungen vom ‚Ideal‘ der geschlossenen Autokratie ab. Der meistdiskutierte autokratische Defekt zeigt sich in der Wahlautokratie. Aber auch bei der Gewähr ziviler Freiheitsrechte, politischer Teilhabe und horizontaler Kontrolle geben sich einige Autokratien recht unautokratisch. In diesem Beitrag skizziere ich ausgehend vom Idealtypus der embedded autocracy und spiegelbildlich zur defekten Demokratie drei Typen defekter Autokratie: liberale, inklusive und kontrollierte Autokratien. Ich ziehe zwei neue und eine altbekannte Datenquelle heran, um autokratische Defekte zu messen, und stelle deren weltweite Entwicklung und gegenwärtige Verteilung dar. In einer quantitativen Ereignisanalyse (survival analysis) untersuche ich den Effekt autokratischer Defekte auf verschiedene Szenarien autokratischen Regime-Zusammenbruchs Es zeigt sich, dass unter Kontrolle auf Defekte in anderen Teilregimen Wahlen keinen konsistenten Einfluss auf das Risiko des Zusammenbruchs ausüben. Am bedrohlichsten für autokratische Regime sind liberale Defekte: Die Kontrolle und Einschränkung ziviler Freiheiten ist überlebenswichtig für autokratische Herrscher.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Albertus, Michael und Victor Menaldo. 2012. Dictators as Founding Fathers? The Role of Constitutions Under Autocracy. Economics & Politics 24 (3): 279-306.
al-Sayyid-Marsot, Afaf Lutfi. 1984. Religion or Opposition? Urban Protest Movements in Egypt. International Journal of Middle East Studies 16 (04): 541-552.
Ambrosio, Thomas. 2007. Insulating Russia From A Color Revolution: How the Kremlin Resists Regional Democratic Trends. Democratization 14 (2): 232-251.
Ambrosio, Thomas. 2010. Constructing a Framework of Authoritarian Diffusion: Concepts, Dynamics, and Future Research. International Studies Perspectives 11 (4): 375-392.
Ambrosio, Thomas. 2014. Democratic states and authoritarian firewalls: America as a black knight in the uprising in Bahrain. Contemporary Politics 20 (3): 331-346.
Bader, Julia. 2015. China’s foreign relations and the survival of autocracies. London: Routledge.
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo und Ernesto Ganuza. 2014. Participatory Budgeting as if Emancipation Mattered. Politics & Society 42 (1): 29-50.
Benz, Arthur und Sabine Kropp. 2014. Föderalismus in Demokratien und Autokratien – Vereinbarkeiten, Spannungsfelder und Dynamiken. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 8 (1): 1-27.
Bogaards, Matthijs. 2009. How to classify hybrid regimes? Defective democracy and electoral authoritarianism. Democratization 16 (2): 399-423.
Bohmelt, Tobias. 2014. Political Opportunity Structures in Dictatorships? Explaining ENGO Existence in Autocratic Regimes. The Journal of Environment & Development 23 (4): 446-471.
Boix, Carles und Susan Stokes. 2003. Endogenous Democratization. World Politics 53 (4): 517-549.
Boix, Carles und Milan W. Svolik. 2013. The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment, and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships. The Journal of Politics 75 (2): 300-316.
Brownlee, Jason. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brownlee, Jason. 2009. Portents of Pluralism: How Hybrid Regimes Affect Democratic Transition. American Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 515-532.
Brownlee, Jason. 2012. Democracy prevention. The politics of the U.S.-Egyptian alliance. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, David R. und Mitchell A. Orenstein. 2012. Post-Soviet Authoritarianism: The Influence of Russia in Its “Near Abroad”. Post-Soviet Affairs 28 (1): 1-44.
Collier, David und Steven Levitsky. 1997. Democracy with Adjectives. Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research. World Politics 49: 430-451.
Croissant, Aurel. 2014. Ways of Constitution-Making in Southeast Asia: Actors, Interests, Dynamics. Contemporary Southeast Asia 36 (1): 23.
Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Davenport, Christian. 2007. State Repression and Political Order. Annual Review of Political Science 10: 1-23.
Diamond, Larry. 2002. Elections Without Democracy: Thinking About Hybrid Regimes. Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 21-35.
Escribà-Folch, Abel. 2013. Repression, Political Threats, and Survival Under Autocracy. International Political Science Review 34: 543-560.
Gandhi, Jennifer. 2008. Political Institutions Under Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gandhi, Jennifer und Ellen Lust-Okar. 2009. Elections under Authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science 12: 403-422.
Gandhi, Jennifer und Adam Przeworski. 2007. Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats. Comparative Political Studies 40 (11): 1279-1301.
Gates, Scott, Håvard Hegre, Mark P. Jones und Håvard Strand. 2006. Institutional Inconsistency and Political Instability: Polity Duration, 1800-2000. American Journal of Political Science 50: 893-908.
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. What Do We Know About Democratization after Twenty Years? Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115-144.
Geddes, Barbara, Joseph Wright und Erica Frantz. 2014. Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set. Perspectives on Politics 12 (2): 313-331.
Gerschewski, Johannes, Wolfgang Merkel, Alexander Schmotz, Christoph H. Stefes und Dag Tanneberg. 2012. Warum überleben Diktaturen? Politische Vierteljahresschrift (Sonderheft 47): 106-131.
Gerschewski, Johannes und Alexander Schmotz. 2011. Contrary or Contradictory? Autocracies and Democracies between Dichotomy and Gradation. Paper prepared for the 6th ECPR General Conference. University of Iceland. Reykjavik.
Giersdorf, Stephan und Aurel Croissant. 2011. Civil Society and Competitive Authoritarianism in Malaysia. Journal of Civil Society 7 (1): 1-21.
Gilbert, Leah und Payam Mohseni. 2011. Beyond Authoritarianism: The Conceptualization of Hybrid Regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development 46 (3): 270-297.
Golub, Jonathan und Alexander Schmotz. 2015. Event History Analysis in the Study of Regime Change. Paper presented at the International Dimensions of Authoritarian Rule Workshop. King‘s College London. London.
Grambsch, Patricia M. und Terry M. Therneau. 1994. Proportional Hazards Tests and Diagnostics Based on Weighted Residuals. Biometrika 81 (3): 515-526.
Hadenius, Axel und Jan Teorell. 2007. Pathways from Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 18 (1): 143-156.
He, Baogang. 2011. Civic engagement through participatory budgeting in China. Three different logics at work. Public Administration and Development 31 (2): 122-133.
Heydemann, Steven und Reinoud Leenders. 2011. Authoritarian Learning and Authoritarian Resilience: Regime Responses to the ‘Arab Awakening’. Globalizations 8 (5): 647-653.
Holbig, Heike. 2013. Ideology after the end of ideology. China and the quest for autocratic legitimation. Democratization 20 (1): 61-81.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave. Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Koesel, Karrie J. und Valerie J. Bunce. 2013. Diffusion-Proofing: Russian and Chinese Responses to Waves of Popular Mobilizations against Authoritarian Rulers. Perspectives on Politics 11 (03): 753-768.
Levitsky, Steven und Lucan A. Way. 2002. Elections without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 51-65.
Levitsky, Steven; Lucan A. Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism. Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lin, Li-Wen und Curtis J. Milhaupt. 2013. We Are the (National) Champions: Understanding the Mechanisms of State Capitalism in China. Stanford Law Review 65 (4): 697-759.
Lin, Nan. 2011. Capitalism in China. A Centrally Managed Capitalism (CMC) and Its Future. Management and Organization Review 7 (1): 63-96.
Lindberg, Staffan I. Hrsg. 2009. Democratization by Elections. A New Mode of Transition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Linz, Juan J. 1970. An Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Spain. In Mass Politics: Studies in Political Sociology, hrsg. Erik Allardt und Stein Rokkan, 251-283. New York: Free Press.
Linz, Juan J. 1975. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. In Handbook on Political Science, Bd. 3, hrsg. Fred I. Greenstein und Belson W. Polsby, 175-411. Reading: Addison Wesley.
Linz, Juan J. 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. London: Lynne Rienner.
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review 53 (1): 69-105.
Lorentzen, Peter L. 2013. Regularizing Rioting. Permitting Public Protest in an Authoritarian Regime. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 8 (2): 127-158.
Luciani, Giacomo. 1990. Allocation vs. Production States: A Theoretical Framework. In The Arab State, hrsg. Giacomo Luciani, 65-84. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lueders, Hans und Aurel Croissant. 2014. Wahlen, Strategien autokratischer Herrschaftssicherung und das Überleben autokratischer Regierungen. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 8 (3): 329-355.
Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2006. Elections under Authoritarianism: Preliminary Lessons from Jordan. Democratization 13 (3): 456-471.
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy. Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2008. Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule. Comparative Political Studies 41 (4-5): 715-741.
Marshall, Monty G., Ted Gurr und Keith Jaggers. 2013. Polity IV Project. Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2012. Data Users’ Manual. Centre for Systemic Peace. Online unter www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2012.pdf, Zugriff am 04.04.2014.
Marshall, Monty G., Ted Robert Gurr und Keith Jaggers. 2014. Polity IV Project. Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2013. Dataset Users’ Manual. Centre for Systemic Peace. Online unter www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2013.pdf, Zugriff am 05.11.2015.
Merkel, Wolfgang. 1999. Defekte Demokratien. In Demokratie in Ost und West, hrsg. Wolfgang Merkel und Andreas Busch, 361-382. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Merkel, Wolfgang. 2004. Embedded and Defective Democracies. Democratization 11 (5): 33-58.
Merkel, Wolfgang. 2010. Systemtransformation. Eine Einführung in die Theorie und Empirie der Transformationsforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2. Aufl.
Merkel, Wolfgang und Aurel Croissant. 2000. Formale und informale Institutionen in defekten Demokratien. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 41 (1): 3-30.
Merkel, Wolfgang; Johannes Gerschewski; Alexander Schmotz; Christoph H. Stefes; Dag Tanneberg. 2015. Critical Junctures and the Survival of Dictatorships. Unpublished Book Manuscript.
Merkel, Wolfgang; Hans-Jürgen Puhle; Aurel Croissant; Claudia Eicher; Peter Thiery. 2003. Defekte Demokratie. Bd. 1 Theorie. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Merkel, Wolfgang; Puhle, Hans-Jürgen; Croissant, Aurel; Thiery, Peter. 2006. Defekte Demokratie. Bd. 2 Regionalanalysen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Møller, Jørgen und Svend-Erik Skaaning. 2013. Respect for Civil Liberties During the Third Wave of Democratization: Presenting a New Dataset. Social Indicators Research 117 (3): 1069-1087.
Morse, Yonatan L. 2012. The Era of Electoral Authoritarianism. World Politics 64 (01): 161-198.
O’Brien, Kevin J. 2008. Popular Protest in China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
O’Donnell, Guillermo; Philippe Schmitter. 1986. Transitions From Authoritarian Rule. Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies. 4 Bände. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press (4).
Ottaway, Marina. 2003. Democracy Challenged. The Rise of Semi-Authoritarianism. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Perry, Elizabeth J. 2002. Challenging the mandate of Heaven. Social protest and state power in China. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.
Posusney, Marsha Pripstein. 1993. Irrational Workers. The Moral Economy of Labor Protest in Egypt. World Politics 46 (1): 83-120.
Przeworski, Adam und Ferdinand Limongi. 1997. Modernization: Theories and Facts. World Politics 49 (2): 155-183.
Roessler, Philipp G. und Marc M. Howard. 2009. Post-Cold War Political Regimes. When Do Elections Matter? In Democratization by Elections. A New Mode of Transition, hrsg. Staffan I. Lindberg, 101-127. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ross, Michael L. 2001. Does Oil Hinder Democracy? World Politics 53 (3): 325-361.
Schedler, Andreas. 2002. The Nested Game of Democratization by Elections. International Political Science Review 23 (1): 103-122.
Schedler, Andreas. 2006. The Logic of Electoral Authoritarianism. In Electoral Authoritarianism. The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, hrsg. Andreas Schedler, 1-23. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Schedler, Andreas. 2013. The Politics of Uncertainty. Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmotz, Alexander. 2015a. Hybride Regime. In Handbuch Transformationsforschung, hrsg. Raj Kollmorgen, Wolfgang Merkel und Hans-Jürgen Wagener, 561-567. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Schmotz, Alexander. 2015b. Vulnerability and Compensation: Constructing an Index of Co-optation in Autocratic Regimes. European Political Science 14 (4): 439-457.
Schmotz, Alexander und Oisín Tansey. 2015. Regional Autocratic Linkage and Regime Survival. Prepared for the Second IDCAR Network Conference. Austin, Texas.
Skaaning, Svend-Erik. 2008. The Civil Liberty Dataset: Conceptualization and Measurement. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 2 (1): 99-121.
Skaaning, Svend-Erik, John Gerring und Henrikas Bartusevičius. 2015. A Lexical Index of Electoral Democracy. Comparative Political Studies 48 (12): 1491-1525.
Svolik, Milan W. 2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tansey, Oisín. 2016. The International Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tansey, Oisín, Kevin Koehler und Alexander Schmotz. 2016. Ties to the Rest: Autocratic Linkage and Regime Survival. Comparative Political Studies, published online before print.
Teets, Jessica C. 2014. Civil society under authoritarianism. The China model. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Tolstrup, Jakob. 2013. Russia vs. the EU. The competition for influence in post-Soviet states. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Ulfelder, Jay. 2007. Natural-Resource Wealth and the Survival of Autocracy. Comparative Political Studies 40 (8): 995-1018.
Walder, Andrew G. 2003. Elite Opportunity in Transitional Economies. American Sociological Review 68 (6): 899.
Wigell, Mikael. 2008. Mapping “Hybrid Regimes”: Regime Types and Concepts in Comparative Politics. Democratization 15 (2): 230-250.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schmotz, A. (2017). Defekte Autokratie. In: Croissant, A., Kneip, S., Petring, A. (eds) Demokratie, Diktatur, Gerechtigkeit. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16090-6_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16090-6_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-16089-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-16090-6
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)