Zusammenfassung
Mixed mode studies in survey research have been around since a long time. Whenever a new mode of data collection emerges, it has been combined with existing traditional modes of data collection, and compared in terms of resulting response rates, response bias, data quality and measurement error (Couper 2011, for general overviews of traditional mixed mode studies see de Leeuw 2005 and De Leeuw et al. 2008).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Antoun, C. (2015). Mobile Web Surveys: a First Look at Measurement, Nonresponse, and Coverage Errors. Doctoral Dissertation, the University of Michigan.
Avendano, M., Scherpenzeel, A., & Mackenbach, J. (2011). Can biomarkers be collected in an Internet survey? A pilot study in the LISS panel. In M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and behavioral research and the Internet: Advances in applied methods and research strategies, New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Blom, A.G., Bosnjak, M., Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A., Das, M., Douhou, S., & Krieger, U. (2015). Comparison of Four Probability-Based Online and Mixed-Mode Panels in Europe. Social Science Computer Review 0894439315574825, first published on March 31, doi: 10.1177/0894439315574825.
Connor Gorber, S., Tremblay, M., Moher, D., & Gorber, B. (2007). A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obesity Reviews, 8, 307-326.
Couper, M.P. (2011). The future of modes of data collection. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, (5), 889-908.
De Bruyne, M. (2015). Designing Web Surveys for the Multi-Device Internet. Doctoral Dissertation, Tilburg University.
De Leeuw, E.D. (2005). To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 21, 233-255.
De Leeuw, E.D., Hox, J.J., & Dillman, D.A. (2008). Mixed-mode surveys: When and why. In E.D. de Leeuw, J.J. Hox, & D.A. Dillman (Eds.), International Handbook of Survey Methodology. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
De Leeuw, E.D., & Hox, J.J. (2011). Internet surveys as part of a mixed-mode design. In M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and behavioral research and the Internet: Advances in applied methods and research strategies. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Eurostat (2009). Harmonized European time use surveys, Guidelines 2008. Methodologies and Working Papers. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-manuals-and-guidelines/-/KS-RA-08-014. Zugegriffen: 26. Juli 2016.
Fernee, H., & Sonck, N. (2014). A comparison between time-use data collected by smartphones and a paper diary [powerpoint slides]. Presentation at the XV111 ISA World Congress of Sociology, 13-19 July 2014, Yokohama, Japan
Geurs, K., Veenstra, S., & Thomas, T. (2013). The setup of a mobile mobility panel for the Netherlands. Paper presented at the 13th The World Conference on Transport Research (WCTR), July 15-18, 2013, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Groves R.M., Cialdini, R.B., & Couper, M.P. (1992). Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 475-495.
Hoogendoorn, A., & Daalmans, J. (2009). Nonresponse in the recruitment of an internet panel based on probability sampling. Survey Research Methods, 3, 59-72.
Kapteyn, A. (2015). Comparing subjective and objective physical measures across countries. Manuscript.
Kooreman, P., & Scherpenzeel, A. (2014). Advanced Body Mass Measurement, Feedback, and Health Behaviors. Economics and human biology, 14, 141-153.
Lozar Manfreda, K., Bosnjak, M., Berzelak, J., Haas, I., & Vehovar, V. (2008). Web surveys versus other survey modes: A meta-analysis comparing response rates. International Journal of Market Research, 50, 79-104.
Lugtig, P., & Toepoel, V. (2015). The Use of PCs, Smartphones, and Tablets in a Probability-Based Panel Survey: Effects on Survey Measurement Error, Social Science Computer Review, 34, 78-94.
Saris, W.E. (1998). Ten Years of Interviewing Without Interviewers: The Telepanel. In M. P. Couper et al. (Eds.), Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection (p. 409-429), New York: Wiley.
Scherpenzeel, A., & Das, M. (2011). True Longitudinal and Probability-Based Internet Panels: Evidence from the Netherlands. In M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and behavioral research and the Internet: Advances in applied methods and research strategies, New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Sonck, N., & Fernee, H. (2013). Using smartphones in survey research: a multifunctional tool. Implementation of a time use app; a feasibility study. SCP-publication 2013-22, The Hague: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research.
Thomas, T., Geurs, K., Bijlsma, M., & Douhou, S. (2014). Hoe mobiel zijn we eigenlijk? Eerste inzichten uit het Mobiele Mobiliteitspanel (How mobile are we really? First insights from the Mobile Mobility Panel). Tijdschrift Vervoerswetenschap, 50 (3), 138-154.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scherpenzeel, A. (2017). Mixing Online Panel Data Collection with Innovative Methods. In: Eifler, S., Faulbaum, F. (eds) Methodische Probleme von Mixed-Mode-Ansätzen in der Umfrageforschung. Schriftenreihe der ASI - Arbeitsgemeinschaft Sozialwissenschaftlicher Institute. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15834-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15834-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-15833-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-15834-7
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)