Advertisement

Mixing Online Panel Data Collection with Innovative Methods

  • Annette ScherpenzeelEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Schriftenreihe der ASI - Arbeitsgemeinschaft Sozialwissenschaftlicher Institute book series (SASI)

Zusammenfassung

Mixed mode studies in survey research have been around since a long time. Whenever a new mode of data collection emerges, it has been combined with existing traditional modes of data collection, and compared in terms of resulting response rates, response bias, data quality and measurement error (Couper 2011, for general overviews of traditional mixed mode studies see de Leeuw 2005 and De Leeuw et al. 2008).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Antoun, C. (2015). Mobile Web Surveys: a First Look at Measurement, Nonresponse, and Coverage Errors. Doctoral Dissertation, the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  2. Avendano, M., Scherpenzeel, A., & Mackenbach, J. (2011). Can biomarkers be collected in an Internet survey? A pilot study in the LISS panel. In M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and behavioral research and the Internet: Advances in applied methods and research strategies, New York: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  3. Blom, A.G., Bosnjak, M., Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A., Das, M., Douhou, S., & Krieger, U. (2015). Comparison of Four Probability-Based Online and Mixed-Mode Panels in Europe. Social Science Computer Review 0894439315574825, first published on March 31, doi:  10.1177/0894439315574825.
  4. Connor Gorber, S., Tremblay, M., Moher, D., & Gorber, B. (2007). A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obesity Reviews, 8, 307-326.Google Scholar
  5. Couper, M.P. (2011). The future of modes of data collection. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, (5), 889-908.Google Scholar
  6. De Bruyne, M. (2015). Designing Web Surveys for the Multi-Device Internet. Doctoral Dissertation, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
  7. De Leeuw, E.D. (2005). To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 21, 233-255.Google Scholar
  8. De Leeuw, E.D., Hox, J.J., & Dillman, D.A. (2008). Mixed-mode surveys: When and why. In E.D. de Leeuw, J.J. Hox, & D.A. Dillman (Eds.), International Handbook of Survey Methodology. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  9. De Leeuw, E.D., & Hox, J.J. (2011). Internet surveys as part of a mixed-mode design. In M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and behavioral research and the Internet: Advances in applied methods and research strategies. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  10. Eurostat (2009). Harmonized European time use surveys, Guidelines 2008. Methodologies and Working Papers. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-manuals-and-guidelines/-/KS-RA-08-014. Zugegriffen: 26. Juli 2016.
  11. Fernee, H., & Sonck, N. (2014). A comparison between time-use data collected by smartphones and a paper diary [powerpoint slides]. Presentation at the XV111 ISA World Congress of Sociology, 13-19 July 2014, Yokohama, JapanGoogle Scholar
  12. Geurs, K., Veenstra, S., & Thomas, T. (2013). The setup of a mobile mobility panel for the Netherlands. Paper presented at the 13th The World Conference on Transport Research (WCTR), July 15-18, 2013, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
  13. Groves R.M., Cialdini, R.B., & Couper, M.P. (1992). Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 475-495.Google Scholar
  14. Hoogendoorn, A., & Daalmans, J. (2009). Nonresponse in the recruitment of an internet panel based on probability sampling. Survey Research Methods, 3, 59-72.Google Scholar
  15. Kapteyn, A. (2015). Comparing subjective and objective physical measures across countries. Manuscript.Google Scholar
  16. Kooreman, P., & Scherpenzeel, A. (2014). Advanced Body Mass Measurement, Feedback, and Health Behaviors. Economics and human biology, 14, 141-153.Google Scholar
  17. Lozar Manfreda, K., Bosnjak, M., Berzelak, J., Haas, I., & Vehovar, V. (2008). Web surveys versus other survey modes: A meta-analysis comparing response rates. International Journal of Market Research, 50, 79-104.Google Scholar
  18. Lugtig, P., & Toepoel, V. (2015). The Use of PCs, Smartphones, and Tablets in a Probability-Based Panel Survey: Effects on Survey Measurement Error, Social Science Computer Review, 34, 78-94.Google Scholar
  19. Saris, W.E. (1998). Ten Years of Interviewing Without Interviewers: The Telepanel. In M. P. Couper et al. (Eds.), Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection (p. 409-429), New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Scherpenzeel, A., & Das, M. (2011). True Longitudinal and Probability-Based Internet Panels: Evidence from the Netherlands. In M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and behavioral research and the Internet: Advances in applied methods and research strategies, New York: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  21. Sonck, N., & Fernee, H. (2013). Using smartphones in survey research: a multifunctional tool. Implementation of a time use app; a feasibility study. SCP-publication 2013-22, The Hague: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  22. Thomas, T., Geurs, K., Bijlsma, M., & Douhou, S. (2014). Hoe mobiel zijn we eigenlijk? Eerste inzichten uit het Mobiele Mobiliteitspanel (How mobile are we really? First insights from the Mobile Mobility Panel). Tijdschrift Vervoerswetenschap, 50 (3), 138-154.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA)MünchenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations