Zusammenfassung
Viele Universitäten haben Fort- und Weiterbildungseinrichtungen etabliert und betreiben diese in zahlreichen Fällen als eigene Gesellschaften. Dabei wird erwartet, dass diese ihre Kosten durch die Beiträge der TeilnehmerInnen der verschiedenen Lehrveranstaltungen abdecken und in der Bilanz zumindest ein ausgeglichenes Ergebnis erwirtschaften. Zur Erreichung dieser Zielsetzung ist es notwendig, attraktive Programme anzubieten.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Alves, H. (2010). The Measurement of Perceived Value in Higher Education: a Unidimensional Approach. http://wdge.ubi.pt/investigacao/TDiscussao/2010/TD04_2010.pdf. Zugegriffen: 18. Jänner 2016.
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-656.
Belz, B., & Biger, T. (2006). Customer Value – Kundenvorteile schaffen Unternehmensvorteile. Landsberg am Leech.
Geertshuis, S., & Krickl, O. (2012). Perceived service value and willingness to pay for Continuing Education, Tagungsband: 34nd EUCEN Conference – Universities Engagement in and with Society, University of Graz, May 2012.
Geertshuis, S., & Krickl, O. (2016). Perceived Service Value. In: J. Field, B. Schmidt-Hertha & A. Waxenegger, Universities and Engagement (S. 80-89). London.
Holbrook, M. B. (1999). Consumer value: A framework for analysis and research. London.
Krickl, O., & Geertshuis, S. (2012). Continuing education services – perceived service value and related constructs, Tagungsband: Management Knowledge and Learning – Internation Conference, Celje (CD-Rom).
LeBlanc, G., & Nguyen, N. (1999). Listening to the customer’s voice: examining perceived service value among business college students. International Journal of Educational Management, 13(4), 187-198.
Milam, J. (2005). The role of noncredit courses in serving nontraditional learners. New Directions for Higher Education, 2005(129), 55-68.
Payne, A., & Holt, S. (2001). Diagnosing customer value: integrating the value process and relationship marketing. British Journal of Management, 12, 159-182.
Park, W., & Lessig, P. (1977). Students and Housewives: differences in susceptibility to reference group influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 102-110.
Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22, 159-170.
Wilkins, S., Balakrishnan, M. S., & Huisman, J. (2012). Student satisfaction and student perceptions of quality at international branch campuses in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(5), 543-556.
Winter, A., Wiseman, J., & Muirhead, B. (2006). University-community engagement in Australia practice, policy and public good. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 1(3), 211-230.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krickl, O. (2017). Welchen Wert haben Universitätslehrgänge für TeilnehmerInnen. In: Egger, R., Bauer, M. (eds) Bildungspartnerin Universität. Lernweltforschung, vol 21. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15013-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15013-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-15012-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-15013-6
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)