Advertisement

Entrepreneurship im Krankenhaussektor

  • Stefan Ingerfurth
  • Frederik O. Andersson
  • Jurgen Willems
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Ziel dieses Beitrages ist es, „Autonomie“ als eine Vorbedingung für Entrepreneurship zu setzen. Unter dem Begriff Autonomie wird verstanden, wie frei Organisationen ihre strategischen, taktischen und operationalen Möglichkeiten wählen, entwickeln und verfolgen können, ohne dabei von internen (interne Autonomie) oder externen (externe Autonomie) Einschränkungen betroffen zu sein. Interne Einschränkungen hängen mit internen Strukturen und mit der Verfügbarkeit von Ressourcen zusammen. Externe Einschränkungen hingegen werden hauptsächlich durch Umwelteinflüsse bestimmt, also beispielsweise externe Stakeholder oder Gesetze.

Ausgehend von einem Klassifikationsschema zeigt sich, dass sich Entrepreneurship im Krankenhaussektor in Deutschland schwierig gestaltet, da sowohl eine geringe interne, als auch eine geringe externe Autonomie vorliegt.

Literatur

  1. Austin J, Stevenson H, Wei-Skillern J (2006) Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same. Different, or both? Entrep Theory Pract 30(1):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker T, Nelson RE (2005) Creating something from nothing: resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Admin Sci Quart 50(3):329–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhuian SN, Menguc B, Bell SJ (2005) Just entrepreneurial enough: the moderating effect of entrepreneurship on the relationship between market orientation and performance. J Bus Res 58(1):9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourgeois LJ (1980) Strategy and environment: a conceptual integration. Acad Manage Rev 5(1):25–39Google Scholar
  5. Burgelman RA (1983) A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Admin Sci Quart 28(2):223–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burns T, Stalker GM (1996) The management of innovation, hardback ed., reprinted. Oxford Univ. Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Cornforth C (2004) The Governance of cooperatives and mutual associations: a paradox perspective. Ann. Public Coop. Econ 75(1):11–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Covin JG, Slevin DP (1989) Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strateg Manage J 10(1):75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dess GG, Lumpkin GT, McGee JE (1999) Linking corporate entrepreneurship to strategy, structure, and process: suggested research directions. Entrep Theory Pract 23(3):85–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ebben J, Johnson A (2006) Bootstrapping in small firms: an empirical analysis of change over time. J Bus Venturing 21(6):851–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Froelich KA (1999) Diversification of revenue strategies: evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprof Volunt Sec Q 28(3):246–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galbraith JR (1982) Designing the innovating organization. Organ Dyn 10(3):5–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gebert D, Boerner S, Lanwehr R (2003) The risks of autonomy: empirical evidence for the necessity of a balance management in promoting organizational Innovativeness. Creat Innov Manag 12(1):41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. González‐Benito Ó, González‐Benito J, Muñoz‐Gallego PA (2009) Role of entrepreneurship and market orientation in firms‘ success. European Journal of Marketing 43(3/4):500–522Google Scholar
  15. Hannan MT, Carroll GR, Dobrev SD, Han J (1998) Organizational mortality in european and american automobile industries part I: revisiting the effects of age and size. Eur Sociol Rev 14(3):279–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helm ST, Andersson FO (2010) Beyond taxonomy. An empirical validation of social entrepreneurship in the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit Manag Lead 20(3):259–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Helmig B, Hinz V, Ingerfurth S (2014) Extending miles & snow's strategy choice typology to the german hospital sector. Health Policy 118(3):363–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Helmig B, Hinz V, Ingerfurth S (2015) Valuing organizational values: assessing the uniqueness of nonprofit values. Voluntas 26(6):2554–2580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hinz V, Ingerfurth S (2013) Does ownership matter under challenging conditions?: On the relationship between organizational entrepreneurship and performance in the healthcare sector. Public Manag Rev 15(7):969–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hult GTM, Ketchen DJ (2001) Does market orientation matter?: A test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance. Strateg Manage J 22(9):899–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ingerfurth S (2013) Erfolg und Misserfolg von Nonprofit-Organisationen: Zur Bedeutung und Auswirkung strategischer Managemententscheidungen. Wiesbaden, Springer Gabler VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Janz BD, Colquitt JA, Noe RA (1997) Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, and contextual support variables. Pers Psychol 50(4):877–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jennings DF, Lumpkin JR (1989) Functioning modeling corporate entrepreneurship: an empirical integrative analysis. J Manage 15(3):485–502Google Scholar
  24. Kanter RM (1984) The change masters: innovation and entrepreneurship in the American corporation. New York, Simon & Schuster PublishingGoogle Scholar
  25. Kemelgor BH (2010) A comparative analysis of corporate entrepreneurial orientation between selected firms in the Netherlands and the USA. Entrep Region Dev 14(1):67–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (1996) Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Acad Manage Rev 21(1):135–172Google Scholar
  27. Lumpkin GT, Cogliser CC, Schneider DR (2009) Understanding and measuring autonomy: an entrepreneurial orientation perspective. Entrep Theory Pract 33(1):47–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lumpkin GT, Moss TW, Gras DM, Kato S, Amezcua AS (2013) Entrepreneurial processes in social contexts: How are they different, if at all?. Small Bus Econ 40(3):761–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin RL, Osberg S (2007) Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review 5(2):28–39Google Scholar
  30. Matsuno K, Mentzer JT, Özsomer A (2002) The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and market orientation on business performance. J Marketing 66(3):18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McKee DO, Varadarajan PR, Pride WM (1989) Strategic adaptability and firm performance: a market-contingent perspective. J Marketing 53(3):21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meyer JW, Scott WR, Rowan B (1983) Organizational environments: ritual and rationality, 1. print. Beverly Hills, Sage PublishingGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller D (1983) The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Manage Sci 29(7):770–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morris MH, Van Vuuren J, Cornwall JR, Scheepers R (2009) Properties of balance: a pendulum effect in corporate entrepreneurship. Bus Horizons 52(5):429–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nordqvist M, Habbershon TG, Melin L (2008) Transgenerational entrepreneurship: exploring entrepreneurial orientation in family firms. In: Landström H, Smallbone D, Laveren E, Crijns H (Hrsg.) Entrepreneurship, sustainable growth and performance: rrontiers in European entrepreneurship research, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, S, 93–116Google Scholar
  36. Pearce II JA, Fritz DA, Davis PS (2010) Entrepreneurial Orientation and the Performance of Religious Congregations as Predicted by Rational Choice Theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 34(1):219–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rauch A, Wiklund J, Lumpkin GT, Frese M (2009) Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: an assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrep Theory Pract 33(3):761–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Salge TO, Vera A (2009) Hospital innovativeness and organizational performance: evidence from English public acute care. Health Care Manage R 34(1):54–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schön DA (1963) Champions for radical new inventions. Harvard Bus Rev 41(2):77–86Google Scholar
  40. Shane S (2008) The illusions of entrepreneurship: The costly myths that entrepreneurs, investors, and policy makers live by. New Haven, Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  41. Short JC, Moss TW, Lumpkin GT (2009) Research in social entrepreneurship: past contributions and future opportunities. Strateg Entrep J 3(2):161–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wood VR, Bhuian S, Kiecker P (2000) Market orientation and organizational performance in not-for-profit hospitals. J Bus Res 48(3):213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Ingerfurth
    • 1
  • Frederik O. Andersson
    • 2
  • Jurgen Willems
    • 3
  1. 1.SRH Fernhochschule – The Mobile UniversityRiedlingenDeutschland
  2. 2.School of Public and Environmental Affairs; Indiana University Purdue University IndianapolisMilwaukeeUSA
  3. 3.Universität HamburgHamburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations