Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Personalauswahl pp 301–319Cite as

Innovationsorientierte Personalauswahl

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 29k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In Zeiten turbulenter, durch die globale Rezession ernsthaft angeschlagener Märkte ist es für Organisationen bedeutsam, zur Erlangung bzw. Aufrechterhaltung ihrer Wettbewerbsfähigkeit kontinuierlich zu innovieren. Ein Weg, organisationale Innovation zu steigern, besteht in der Rekrutierung und Auswahl innovativer Talente. Gemeint sind organisationsexterne Personen, die in ihren neuen Arbeitsrollen und Arbeitskontexten zukünftig kreativ und innovativ sein werden. Dieses Kapitel beschreibt und integriert vorliegende Forschungsergebnisse zu unterschiedlichen Variablen, die individuelle, innovative Leistung am Arbeitsplatz vorherzusagen vermögen. Auf diesen Überblick aufbauend geben wir Handlungsempfehlungen für die zukünftige Forschung und Praxis. Insbesondere werden wir der Frage Beachtung schenken, welche spezifischen Personalauswahlverfahren zur Diagnose des innovativen Potenzials von Personen besonders geeignet sind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40, 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, N., & Burch, G. S. J. (2003). The team selection inventory. Windsor: ASE/NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, N., & Gasteiger, R. M. (2008). Innovation and creativity in organisations: Individual and work team research findings and implications for government policy. In B. Nooteboom & E. Stam (Hrsg.), Micro-foundations for innovation policy (S. 249–271). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press/WRR.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 147–173.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, N., Salgado, J., Schinkel, S., & Cunningham-Snell, N. (2008). Staffing the organization: An introduction to personnel selection and assessment. In N. Chmiel (Hrsg.), An introduction to work and organizational psychology: A European perspective (S. 257–280). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson, N., Hülsheger, U., & Salgado, J. (2010). Selecting for innovation. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 2014, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 265–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 963–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baer, M., Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (2003). Rewarding creativity: When does it really matter? The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 569–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bartram, D. (2005). The great eight competencies: A criterion-centric approach to validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 9, 1185–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Batey, M., Furnham, A., & Safiullina, X. (2010). Intelligence, general knowledge and personality as predictors of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 532–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Barrick, R. M., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Burch, G. S. J., Pavelis, C., & Port, R. L. (2008). Selecting for creativity and innovation: The relationship between the innovation potential indicator and the team selection inventory. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 177–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders’ and other referents’ normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Choi, J. N. (2004a). Individual and contextual predictors of creative performance: The mediating role of psychological processes. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Choi, J. N. (2004b). Person-environment fit and creative behavior: Differential impacts of supplies-values and demands-abilities versions of fit. Human Relations, 57, 531–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi, J. N. (2004c). Individual and contextual dynamics of innovation-use behavior in organizations. Human Performance, 17, 397–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Choi, J. N., Anderson, T. A., & Veillette, A. (2009). Contextual inhibitors of employee creativity in organizations: The insulating role of creative ability. Group und Organization Management, 34, 330–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Clegg, C., Unsworth, K., Epitropaki, O., & Parker, G. (2002). Implicating trust in the innovation process. Journal of Occupational und Organizational Psychology, 75, 409–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Lebiecki, J. E., & Cortina, J. M. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-Mcintyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 618–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Frese, M., Teng, E., & Wijnen, C. J. D. (1999). Helping to improve suggestion systems: Predictors of making suggestions in companies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1139–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Furnham, A., Batey, M., Anand, D., & Manfield, J. (2008). Personality, hypomania, intelligence and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1060–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Furnham, A., & Nederstrom, M. (2010). Ability, demographic and personality predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 957–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gong, Y., Cheung, S., Wang, M., & Huang, J. (2012). Unfolding the proactive process for creativity: Integration of the employee proactivity, information exchange, and psychological safety perspectives. Journal of Management. doi:10.1177/0149206310380250 (in press).

  30. Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 90–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Howell, J. M., & Boies, K. (2004). Champions of technological innovation: The influence of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 123–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hülsheger, U. R., Lang, J. W. B., Anderson, N., & Kersting, M. (2011). Beyond the Big Five: The role of need for cognition and core self-evaluations for innovative work performance. Presentation at the 15th European Congress of Work and Organizational Psychology (EAWOP), Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Judge, T. A., Locke, A. E., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151–188.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Krause, D. E. (2004). Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors: An empirical investigation. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 79–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lowe, E. A., & Taylor, W. G. K. (1986). Creativity in life sciences research. R und D Management, 16, 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Madjar, N. (2008). Emotional and informational support from different sources and employee creativity. Journal of Occupational und Organizational Psychology, 81, 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). There’s no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees’ creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 757–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. McEntire, L. E., & Greene-Shortridge, T. M. (2011). Recruiting and selecting leaders for innovation: How to find the right leader. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13, 266–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 175–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mount, M. K., & Barrick, R. M. (1995). The Big Five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resource management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 153–200.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertiusiungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 100–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Patterson, F. (2000). The Innovation Potential Indicator: Test manual and user’s guide. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Potočnik, K., & Anderson, N. (2012). Assessing Innovation: A 360-degree appraisal study. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20, 497–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Raja, U., & Johns, G. (2010). The joint effects of personality and job scope on in-role performance, citizenship behaviors and creativity. Human Relations, 63, 981–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research finding. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Shipton, H., Fay, D., West, M., Patterson, M., & Birdi, K. (2005). Managing people to promote innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 118–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2009). Do Big Five personality factors affect individual creativity? The moderating role of extrinsic motivation. Social Behavior and Personality, 37, 941–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Tett, P. R., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management, 30, 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998). The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 540–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang, A., & Cheng, B. (2010). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 106–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang, H., Begley, T., Hui, C., & Lee, C. (2012). Are the effects of conscientiousness on contextual and innovative performance context specific? Organizational culture as a moderator. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 174–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. West, M. A., & Anderson, N. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 680–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Hrsg.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (S. 3–13). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wu, C., Parker, S. K., & Jong, J. P. J. de. (2014). Need for cognition as an antecedent of individual innovation behavior. Journal of Management, 40, 1511–1534. doi:10.1177/0149206311429862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2001). Enhancing creative performance: Effects of expected developmental assessment strategies and creative personality. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Edinburgh Business School, Edinburgh, UK

    Kristina Potočnik

  2. Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK

    Neil Anderson

Authors
  1. Kristina Potočnik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Neil Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristina Potočnik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Berlin, Germany

    Diana Eva Krause

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Potočnik, K., Anderson, N. (2017). Innovationsorientierte Personalauswahl. In: Krause, D. (eds) Personalauswahl. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14567-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14567-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-14566-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-14567-5

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation