Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gründe für die langsame Industrietransformation zur Elektromobilität

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nationale und internationale Trends in der Mobilität

Zusammenfassung

Betrachtet man die gegenwärtige wissenschaftliche Literatur zur Automobilindustrie eingehend, so wird unmittelbar deutlich, dass die Elektromobilität nicht nur einen wichtigen Stellenwert einnimmt, sondern auch das Potenzial in sich trägt, die globale Automobilindustrie fundamental zu verändern. Vielfältige Prognosen betonen, dass bis zum Jahr 2020 rund fünf bis zehn Prozent und bis zum Jahr 2030 sogar annähernd 20 bis 35 Prozent der verkauften Fahrzeuge mit einem elektrisch-betriebenen Motor ausgestattet sein dürften [1]. Gleichzeitig wird eine umfangreiche Konsolidierung unterschiedlichster Industrien (wie z.B. Energie-, Automobil- und IT-Industrie) im Übergang in die Elektromobilität nicht ausgeschlossen [2].

Dem folgenden Artikel liegt ein Arbeitspapier mit dem Titel „Industry Transformation and the Slowness of Strategic Actions in the Transition to Electric Mobility – An Explication of the Contradiction between the Expected Industry Changes and the Current Strategic Behavior of Incumbent Automotive Firms” zugrunde, welches auf der 23. Internationalen GERPISA-Konferenz 2015 in Paris vorgestellt wurde.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • [1] University of Duisburg-Essen (ed.) (2013): Competitiveness of the EU Automotive Industry in Electric Vehicles, Final Report, EU, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • [2] Fournier, G.; Hinderer, H.; Schmid, D.; Seign, R. & Baumann, M. (2012): The new mobility paradigm – transformation of value chain and business models, Conference Paper, Gerpisa colloquium (2012) Krakow, pp. 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • [3] Proff, H.; Fojcik, T. M.; Jung, B. & Sommer, K. C. (2014): Developing business models in times of a one-time long-term far-reaching technological change - A competence-based perspective, Journal of Competence- based Strategic Management, Vol. 7, pp. 35-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • [4] Kimble, C. & Wang, H. (2012): Transistors, electric vehicles and leapfrogging in China and Japan, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 22-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • [5] Bruche, G. & Wäldchen, D. (2013): Racing to the top? Catch-up strategies of Chinese and Indian independent car manufacturers, Int. J. Automotive Technology and Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 36-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • [6] Caiazza, R. & Nueno, P.: (2014): Corporate strategies of automotive firms: how to become global leaders, Competitiveness Review, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 119-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • [7] Fojcik, T. M. (2013): Exploitation, exploration and the ambidextrous design choice in the transition to electric vehicles – an analysis of small and medium-sized automotive suppliers in Germany, Int. J. Automotive Technology and Management, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 354-371.

    Google Scholar 

  • [8] Fojcik, T. M. (2012): Capacity for Change − A Crucial Factor to Firm Performance and Survival in the Automotive Industry, In: Proff, H./Schönharting, J./Schramm, D./ Ziegler, J. (Hrsg.): Zukünftige Entwicklungen in der Mobilität - Betriebswirtschaftliche und technische Aspekte, Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp. 315-332. (= Future Developments in Mobility – Economical and Technological Aspects.)

    Google Scholar 

  • [9] Amatucci, M. (2015): The world that chose the machine: an evolutionary view of the technological race in the history of the automobile, Int. J. Automotive Technology and Management, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 43-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • [10] Liesenkötter, B. & Schewe, G. (2013): Sailing-Ship-Effect in der Automobilwirtschaft, Proff, H. et al. (Eds.): Schritte in die künftige Mobilität – Technische und betriebswirtschaftliche Herausforderungen, Wiesbaden, pp. 273-286. (= Future Developments in Mobility – Economical and Technological Aspects.)

    Google Scholar 

  • [11] CAAM (2015): Automotive Statistics, China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, http://www.caam.org.cn/AutomotivesStatistics/20150114/0905144510.html.

  • [12] NADA (2014): Automotive Statistics, National Automobile Dealers Association, NADA_market_Beat_2014_12.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • [13] KBA (2015a): Fahrzeugzulassungen 12/2014, Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt, http://www.kba.de/SharedDocs/Publikationen/DE/PM/2015/pm_01_15_fahrzeugzulassungen_12_2014_pdf.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=5.

  • [14] KBA (2015b): Statistik, Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt, http://www.kba.de/DE/Statistik/Fahrzeuge/Neuzulassungen/MonatlicheNeuzulassungen/2014/201412GV1monatlich/201412_n_barometer_teil2_tabelle.html?nn=653844.

  • [15] EV-sales.blogspot.de (2015a): South Korea December 2014 (Draft Edition), http://evsales.blogspot.de/2015/01/south-korea-december-2014-draft-edition.html.

  • [16] EV-sales.blogspot.de (2015b): Japan December 2014, http://ev-sales.blogspot.de/2015/01/japan-december-2014.html.

  • [17] Fojcik, T. M. & Proff, H. (2014): Accelerating market diffusion of battery electric vehicles through alternative mobility concepts, Int. J. Automotive Technology and Management, Vol. 14, No. 3/4, pp. 347-368.

    Google Scholar 

  • [18] Altenburg, T. (2014): From Combustion Engines to Electric Vehicles. A Study of Technological Path Creation and Disruption in Germany, German Development Institute (DIE), Discussion Paper 29/2014, pp. 1-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • [19] Lieberman, M. B. & Montgomery, D. B. (1988): First-Mover Advantages, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 41-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • [20] Kerin, R. A.; Varadarajan, P. R. & Peterson, R. A. (1992): First-Mover Advantage: A Synthesis, Conceptual Framework, and Research Propositions, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 33-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • [21] Cho, D.-S.; Kim, D.-J. & Rhee, D. K. (1998): Latecomer Strategies: Evidence from the Semiconductor Industry in Japan and Korea, Organization Science, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 489-505.

    Google Scholar 

  • [22] Porac, J. F.; Thomas, H. & Baden-Fuller, C. (1989): Competitive groups as cognitive communities: the case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 397-416.

    Google Scholar 

  • [23] [23] Kaplan, S. (2011): Research in Cognition and Strategy: Reflections on Two Decades of Progress and a Look to the Future, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 665-695.

    Google Scholar 

  • [24] Walsh, J. P. (1995): Managerial and organizational cognition: notes from a trip down memory lane, Organization Science, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 280-321.

    Google Scholar 

  • [25] Adner, R. & Helfat, C. E. (2003): Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 10, pp. 1011-1025.

    Google Scholar 

  • [26] Tripsas, M. & Gavetti, G. (2000): Capabilities, Cognition, and Inertia: Evidence from Digital Imaging, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 10/11, Special Issue, pp. 1147-1161.

    Google Scholar 

  • [27] Nadkarni, S. & Barr, P. S. (2008): Environmental Context, Managerial Cognition, and Strategic Action: An Integrated View, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 29, No. 13, pp. 1395-1427.

    Google Scholar 

  • [28] Barr, P. S.; Stimpert, J. L. & Huff, A. S. (1992): Cognitive Change, Strategic Action, and Organizational Renewal, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, No. 1, Special Issue pp. 15-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • [29] Uotila, T.-P. (2015): Elicting Managerial Cognitions – The Role of Cognition in Management Research, Journal of Economics, Business and Management, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 221-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • [30] Fojcik, T. M. & Proff, H. (2015): Catching-up Strategies of German Automotive Companies in the Transition to Alternative Drivetrain Technologies – Learning from the Innovativeness of the Asian Automotive Industry to Develop own Ways?, Working Paper, University of Duisburg-Essen.

    Google Scholar 

  • [31] Eggers, J. P. & Kaplan, S. (2009): Cognition and Renewal: Comparing CEO and Organizational Effects on Incumbent Adaptation to Technical Change, Organization Science, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 461-477.

    Google Scholar 

  • [32] Reinartz, W.; Haenlein, M. & Henseler, J. (2009): An Empirical Comparison of the Efficacy of Covariance-Based and Variance-Based SEM, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 332-344.

    Google Scholar 

  • [33] Henseler, J.; Ringle, C. M. & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009): The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing, Sinkovics, R. R. & Ghauri, P. N. (eds.): Advances in International Marketing, Vol. 20, Bingley, pp. 277-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • [34] Proff, H. & Fojcik, T. M. (2011): Effects of Dynamic Strategies on Capital Market Performance. A Test among Automobile Companies in Japan, North America and Europe, International Journal of Management, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 304-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • [35] Chin W. W. (1998): The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling, Marcoulides, G. A. (ed): Modern Methods for Business Research, Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahway, IL, pp. 295-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • [36] Carmines E. G. & Zeller R. A. (1979): Reliability and Validity Assessment, Sage: Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • [37] Fornell C. & Larcker D. F. (1981): Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 39-50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl ABWL & Int. Automobilmanagement, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Lotharstr. 1, 47057, Duisburg, Deutschland

    Dr. Thomas M. Fojcik

  2. Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. H. Proff

Authors
  1. Dr. Thomas M. Fojcik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. H. Proff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas M. Fojcik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Duisburg-Essen , Duisburg, Germany

    Heike Proff

  2. Universität Duisburg-Essen , Duisburg, Germany

    Thomas Martin Fojcik

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fojcik, T.M., Proff, H. (2016). Gründe für die langsame Industrietransformation zur Elektromobilität. In: Proff, H., Fojcik, T. (eds) Nationale und internationale Trends in der Mobilität. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14563-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14563-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-14562-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-14563-7

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation