Skip to main content

Politische Unterstützung für Kooperationen und Netzwerke

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wissens- und Innovationsgeographie in der Wirtschaftsförderung

Part of the book series: Wirtschaftsförderung in Lehre und Praxis ((WLP))

  • 2123 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel werden aufbauend auf der Diskussion im vorangegangenem Kapitel zwei politische Programme präsentiert, die neben einer Unterstützung privater Forschungs- und Entwicklungsaktivitäten (F&E) auch eine Stimulierung des interorganisationalen Wissenstransfers durch die öffentliche Hand beinhalten. Das betrifft zum einen die Verbundprojektförderung des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) und zum anderen die Forschungsrahmenprogramme der Europäischen Union (EU).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ein anderes wichtiges Programm ist die EUREKA Initiative, die hier aus Platzgründen allerdings nicht diskutiert werden kann.

Literatur

  • Aguiar, L., & Gagnepain, P. (2012). European cooperative R&D and firm performance. Working Paper, Universidad Carlos III De Madrid, 12–07.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschhoff, B. (2008). Who gets the money? The dynamics of R&D project subsidies in Germany. ZEW – Berichte, 08018, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autant-Bernard, C., et al. (2007). Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from european collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies. Papers in Regional Science, 86, 495–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balland, P.-A. (2011). Proximity and the evolution of collaborative networks: Evidence from R&D projects within the GNSS industry. Regional Studies, 46(6), 741–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barajas, A., & Huergo, E. (2010). International R&D cooperation within the EU Framework Programme: Empirical evidence for Spanish firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(1), 87–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barajas, A., Huergo, E., & Moreno, L. (2012). Measuring the economic impact of research joint ventures supported by the EU Framework Programme. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 917–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BMBF. (2008). Merkblatt für Antragsteller/Zuwendungsempfänger zur Zusammenarbeit der Partner von Verbundprojekten. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF-Vordruck 0110/10.08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, S., & Cusmano, L. (2004). Unveiling the texture of a European research area: Emergence of oligarchic networks under EU framework programmes. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(8), 747–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broekel, T. (2015). Do cooperative R&D subsidies stimulate regional innovation efficiency? Evidence from Germany. Regional Studies, 49(7), 1087–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broekel, T., & Graf, H. (2012). Public research intensity and the structure of German R&D networks: A comparison of ten technologies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21(4), 345–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broekel, T., & Hartog, M. (2013). Explaining the structure of inter-organizational networks using exponential random graph models. Industry and Innovation, 20(3), 277–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broekel, T., Fornahl, D., & Morrison, A. (2015). Another cluster premium: Innovation subsidies and R & D collaboration networks. Research Policy, 44(8), 1431–1444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchman, T., & Pyka, A. (2014). The evolution of innovation networks: The case of a publicly funded German automotive network. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 24, 114–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, R., & Kleinknecht, A. H. (2008). The EU framework programs: Are they worth doing? MPRA Paper, No. 8503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delanghe, H., Muldur, U., & Soete, L. (2009). In European science and technology policy. Towards integration or fragmentation? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DFG. (2012). Förderatlas 2012. Bonn: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission. (2008). Council conclusions on the definition of a ‚2020 vision for the European Research Area‘. 16012/08 RECH 379 COMPET 502, Brussels. 09.12.2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäischer Rat. (2010). Conclusions on innovation Union for Europe. Brussels. 26.11.2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., Polt, W., & Vonortas, N. (2009). The impact of publicly funded research on innovation: An analysis of European Framework Programmes for Research and Development. PRO INNO Europe paper # 7, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornahl, D., Broekel, T., & Boschma, R. (2011). What drives patent performance of German biotech firms? The impact of R&D subsidies, knowledge networks and their location. Papers in Regional Science, 90(2), 395–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lata, R., Scherngell, T., & Brenner, T. (2015). Integration processes in European Research and Development: A comparative spatial interaction approach using project based research and development networks, Co-patent networks and Co-publication networks. Geographical Analysis, 47(4), 1538–4632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maggioni, M. A., Nosvelli, M., & Uberti, T. E. (2007). Space versus networks in the geography of innovation: A European analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 471–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marín, P. L., & Siotis, G. (2008). Public policies towards research joint venture: Institutional design and participants’ characteristics. Research Policy, 37(6–7), 1057–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paier, M., & Scherngell, T. (2011). Determinants of collaboration in European R&D networks: Empirical evidence from a discrete choice model. Industry and Innovation, 18(1), 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SBFI. (2015). Frühere Forschungsrahmenprogramme, Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovationen (SBFI) der Schweiz. http://www.sbfi.admin.ch/themen/01370/01683/02092/index.html?lang=de. Zugegriffen am 28.08.2015.

  • Scherngell, T., & Barber, M. J. (2009). Spatial interaction modeling of cross-region R&D collaboration. Empirical Evidence from the 5th EU Framework Programme. Papers in Regional Science, 88(3), 531–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherngell, T., & Barber, M. J. (2011). Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations: Evidence from the fifth EU Framework Programme. Annals of Regional Science, 46(2), 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M., et al. (2012). What determines the innovative success of subsidized collaborative R&D projects? – Project-level evidence from Germany. Technovation, 32(6), 358–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Brökel .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brökel, T. (2016). Politische Unterstützung für Kooperationen und Netzwerke. In: Wissens- und Innovationsgeographie in der Wirtschaftsförderung. Wirtschaftsförderung in Lehre und Praxis . Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13934-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13934-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-13933-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-13934-6

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics