Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Handlungsimplikationen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Arbeitszeugnisse in Deutschland

  • 2892 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In den nachfolgenden Tab. 5.1 und 5.2 sind die wichtigsten deskriptiven Ergebnisse der empirischen Untersuchung nochmals kompakt zusammengestellt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Aamodt, M. G., Bryan, D. A., & Withcomb, A. J. (1993). Predicting performance with letters of recommendation. Public Personnel Management, 01, 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colarelli, S. M., Alampy, R. H., & Alani, K. G. (2002). Letters of recom mendation: An evolutionary perspective. Human Relations, 03, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, H. (2006). Zeugnisse im Beruf: Rechtslage, Zeugnistypen, Formulierungen. München: Goldmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garmel, G. M. (1997). Letters of recommendation: What does good really mean? Academic Emergency Medicine, 08, 833–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, S. (2002). Painlessly write the painful truth. Scientist, 02, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolberg, A. (2010). Kein Exportschlager. Personalwirtschaft, 06, 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, G. L., & Marco, C. A. (2001). Ethical considerations in writing letters of recommendation. Academic Emergency Medicine, 01, 70–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. M., & Goffin, R. D. (2001). Improving the validity of letters of recommendation: An investigation of three standardized reference forms. Military Psychology, 04, 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicklin, J. M., & Roch, S. G. (2009). Letters of recommendation: controversy and consensus from expert perspectives. International Journal of Selection, 03, 76–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, H. (1994). Arbeitszeugnisse richtig schreiben und bewerten. Bamberg: Lexika-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stickling, E. (2010). Eine unglaubliche Ressourcenverschwendung. Personalwirtschaft, 06, 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tommasi, G. W., Williams, K. B., & Nordstrom, C. R. (1998). Letters of recommendation: What information captures hr professionals’ attention. Journal of Business and Psychology, 01, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, A. M., Kyllonen, P. C., & Plante, J. W. (2006). Developing a standardized letter of recommendation. Journal of College Admission, 03, 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzka, K. (2013). Arbeitszeugnisse – mehr als nur ein sinnfreies Ritual? Personalführung, 03, 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzka, K. (2014). Personalmanagement für Führungskräfte. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weuster, A., & Scheer, B. (2015). Arbeitszeugnisse in Textbausteinen Deutsch-Englisch: Rationelle Erstellung, Analyse, Rechtsfragen (13. Aufl.). Stuttgart: Boorberg.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unterwellenborn, Deutschland

    Steffi Grau

  2. Jena, Deutschland

    Klaus Watzka

Authors
  1. Steffi Grau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Klaus Watzka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffi Grau .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grau, S., Watzka, K. (2016). Handlungsimplikationen. In: Arbeitszeugnisse in Deutschland. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13920-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13920-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-13919-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-13920-9

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation