Advertisement

Resilience in Catastrophes, Disasters and Emergencies

Socio-scientific Perspectives
Chapter

Abstract

Resilience is a widely discussed topic in various fields of application. Within the context of socio-scientific disaster research and psychological research on traumatic events, the concept has been used since the late 1970s. Since then, some important and quite remarkable transformations have occurred which have changed the concept, its application, and its scope.

Keywords

Social Capital Natural Hazard Adaptive Capacity Social Vulnerability Disaster Risk Reduction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abelev, M. S. (2009). Advancing Out of Poverty: Social Class Worldview and Its Relation to Resilience. Journal of Adolescent Research 24(1), 114–141.Google Scholar
  2. Adger, N.W. (2000b). Social and ecological resilience: Are They Related? Progress in Human Geography 24, 347–364.Google Scholar
  3. Adger, N.W. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16(3), 268–281. DOI:  10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006.
  4. Adger, W. N. (1996). Approaches to Vulnerability to Climate Change (CSERGE Working Paper GEC 96-05).Google Scholar
  5. Adger, W. N. (2000a). Indicators of Social and Economic Vulnerability to Climate Change in Vietnam (CSERGE Working Paper GEC, 98-02). Online verfügbar unter http://www.cserge.ac.uk/sites/default/files/gec_1998_02.pdf.
  6. Agamben, G. (2009). What is an Apparatus? And Other Essays. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Aldrich, D. P. (2012). Building Resilience. Social Capital in Post-disaster Recovery. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google Scholar
  8. Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. (2015). Social Capital and Community Resilience. American Behavioral Scientist 59(2), 254-269.Google Scholar
  9. Aldunce, P., Beilin, R., Handmer, J., & Howden, M. (2015). Framing Disaster Resilience. The Implications of the Diverse Concepualisations of “Bouncing Back”. Disaster Prevention and Management 23(3), 252–270.Google Scholar
  10. Alexander, D. E. (2013). Resilience and Disaster Risk Reduction: An Etymological Journey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science 13(11), 2707–2716. Retrieved from http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/13/2707/2013/nhess-13-2707-2013.pdf [03/25/2015].
  11. Anderson, M. B., & Woodrow, P. J. (1998). Rising from the Ashes. Development Strategies in Times of Disaster. London: IT Publications.Google Scholar
  12. auf der Heide, E. (2004). Common Misconceptions about Disasters: Panic, the “Disaster Syndrome”, and Looting. In M. O’Leary (ed.), The First 72 Hours: A Community Approach to Disaster Preparedness (pp. 340-380). Lincoln (Nebraska): Universe Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Bankoff, G. (1999). A History of Poverty. The Politics of Natural Disasters in the Philippines, 1985-1995. The Pacific Revue 12(3), 381–420.Google Scholar
  14. Bankoff, G. (2003). Cultures of Disaster. Society and Natural Hazards in the Philippines. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  15. Bankoff, G. (2007a). Comparing Vulnerabilities. Toward Charting a Historical Trajectory of Disasters. Historical Social Research 32(3), 103–114.Google Scholar
  16. Bankoff, G. (2007b). Dangers to Going it Alone. Social Capital and the Origins of Community Resilience in the Philippines. Continuity and Change 22(2), 327–355.Google Scholar
  17. Bankoff, G. (2007c). Living with Risk; Coping with Disasters. Hazard as a Frequent Life Experience in the Philippines. Education about Asia 12(2), 26–29.Google Scholar
  18. Bankoff, G. (2001). Rendering the World Unsafe. ‘Vulnerability’ as Western Discourse”. Disasters 25(1), 19–35.Google Scholar
  19. Bercht, A. L. (2013). Stresserleben, Emotionen und Coping in Guangzhou, China. Mensch-Umwelt-Transaktionen aus geographischer und psychologischer Perspektive. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
  20. Berkes ,F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2003). Introduction. In F. Berkes, J. Colding & C. Folke (eds), Navigating Social-Ecological Systems. Building Resilience for Complexity and Change (pp. 1–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred Ecology. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  22. Berkes, F. (2007). Understanding Uncertainty and Reducing Vulnerability: Lessons from Resilience Thinking. Natural Hazards 41(2), 283–295. doi: 10.1007/s11069-006-9036-7.
  23. Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (2002). Back to the Future: Ecosystem Dynamics and Local Knowledge. In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (eds.), Panarchy. Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems (pp. 121–146). Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  24. Berkes, F., Folke, C., & Gadgil, M. (1995). Traditional Ecological Knowledge, Biodiversity, Resilience and Sustainability. In C. A. Perrings et al (eds), Biodiversity Conservation. Problems and Policies (pp. 281–299). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  25. Berkes, F., & Ross, H. (2013). Community Resilience: Toward an Integrated Approach. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, 26(1), 5-20.Google Scholar
  26. Berkes, F, & Folke, C. (1992). A Systems Perspective on the Interrelations between Natural, Human-made and Cultural Capital. Ecological Economics, 5(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  27. Birkmann, J. (2008). Globaler Umweltwandel, Naturgefahren, Vulnerabilität und Katastrophenresilienz. Notwendigkeit der Perspektivenerweiterung in der Raumplanung. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 66(1), 5-22.Google Scholar
  28. Blaikie, P. M., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (1994). At Risk. Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Blum, S., Endreß, M., Kaufmann, S., Rampp, B. (2016). Soziologische Perspektiven. In R. Wink (ed.), Multidisziplinäre Perspektiven der Resilienzforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  30. Bohle, H. G. (2008). Förderung von Resilience als Herausforderung für die Risikowelten von morgen. In C. Felgentreff & T. Glade (eds), Naturrisiken und Sozialkatastrophen, (pp. 435-441). Berlin: Spektrum.Google Scholar
  31. Bolin, R., & Stanford, L. (1998). The Northridge Earthquake: Vulnerability and Disaster. Vulnerability and Disaster. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Bonß, W. (2015). Karriere und sozialwissenschaftliche Potenziale des Resilienzbegriffs. In M. Endreß & A. Maurer (eds). Resilienz im Sozialen. Theoretische und empirische Analysen (pp. 15–31). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  33. Boon, H. J., Cottrell, A., King, D., Stevenson, R.B., & Millar, J. (2012). Bronfenbrenner’s Bioecological Theory for Modelling Community Resilience to Natural Disasters. Natural Hazards 60(2), 381–408.Google Scholar
  34. Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Brauner, C., & Dombrowsky, W. R. (1996). Defizite der Katastrophenvorsorge in Industriegesellschaften am Beispiel Deutschlands. Untersuchungen und Empfehlungen zu methodischen und inhaltlichen Grundsatzfragen.Google Scholar
  37. Breton, M. (2001). Neighbourhood Resiliency. Journal of Community Practice, 9(1), 21-36.Google Scholar
  38. Brown, D., & Kulig, J. C. (1996). The Concept of Resiliency. Theoretical Lessons from Community Research. Health and Canadian Society, 4, 29-52.Google Scholar
  39. Bürkner, H.-J. (2010). Vulnerabilität und Resilienz. Forschungsstand und sozialwissenschaftliche Untersuchungsperspektiven (IRS Working-Paper 43).Google Scholar
  40. Burton, I., Kates, R. W., & White, G. F. (1978). The Environment as Hazard. Hoboken: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  41. Burton, I., Kates, R. W., & White, Gilbert F. (1993). The Environment as Hazard. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  42. Butler, J. (1997). Das Unbehagen der Geschlechter. 6. Aufl., Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  43. Cannon, T., & Müller-Mahn, D. (2010). Vulnerability, Resilience and Development Discourses in context of Climate change. Natural Hazards, 55(3), 621-635.Google Scholar
  44. Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J.M., & Abel, N. (2001). From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What? Ecosystems, 4(8), 765–781.Google Scholar
  45. Carver, C. (1998). Resilience and Thriving: Issues, Models, and Linkages. Journal of Social Issues, 54(2), 245–266.Google Scholar
  46. Chambers, R., & Conway, G. R. (1991). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century. Institute of Development Studies DP.Google Scholar
  47. Chandler, D. (2013). Resilience and the Autotelic Subject: Toward a Critique of the Societalization of Security. International Political Sociology, 7(2), 210–226.Google Scholar
  48. Christmann, G. B., Balgar, K., & Mahlkow, N. (2015). Zur sozialwissenschaftlichen Konzeption von Vulnerabilität und Resilienz. In M. Endreß & A. Maurer (eds), Resilienz im Sozialen. Theoretische und empirische Analysen (pp. 15–31). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  49. Christopherson, S., Michie, J., & Tyler, P (2010). Regional Resilience: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3, 3–10. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsq004
  50. Clausen, L. (1992). Social Differentiation and the Long-term Origin of Disasters. Natural Hazards, 6(2), 181–190.Google Scholar
  51. Clausen, L. (1994). Krasser sozialer Wandel. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.Google Scholar
  52. Clausen, L. (2003). Reale Gefahren und katastrophensoziologische Theorien. Soziologischer Rat bei FAKKEL-Licht. In L. Clausen, E. M. Geenen & Elísio Macamo (eds), Entsetzliche soziale Prozesse. Theorie und Empirie der Katastrophen (pp. 51–76). Münster: Lit.Google Scholar
  53. Cohen, O., Leykin, D., Lahad, M., Goldberg, A., & Aharonson-Daniel, L. (2013). The Conjoint Community Resiliency Assessment Measure as a Baseline for Profiling and Predicting Community Resilience for Emergencies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80(9), 1732–1741.Google Scholar
  54. Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242–261.Google Scholar
  55. Cutter, S. L., Burton, C. G., & Emrich, C. T. (2010). Disaster Resilience Indicators for Benchmarking Baseline Conditions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 7(1).Google Scholar
  56. Cutter, S., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tat, E., & Webb, J. (2008). A Place-based Model for Understanding Community Resilience to Natural Disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598–606.Google Scholar
  57. Da Silva, J., & Morera, B. (2014). City Resilience Framework. Arup & Rockefeller Foundation. Online: http://publications.arup.com/Publications/C/City_Resilience_Framework.aspx [12/15/2015].
  58. Davis, I. (2004). Progress in Analysis of Social Vulnerability and Capacity. In G. Bankoff, G. Frerks & D. Hilhorst (eds), Mapping Vulnerability. Disasters, Development and People (pp. 128–144). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  59. Deffner, V. (2007). Soziale Verwundbarkeit im ,Risikoraum Favela‘- Eine Analyse des sozialen Raumes auf der Grundlage von Bourdieus „Theorie der Praxis“. In R. Wehrhahn (ed.), Risiko und Vulnerabilität in Lateinamerika (pp. 207–232). Kiel: Selbstverlag des Geographischen Instituts der Universität Kiel.Google Scholar
  60. Delica-Willison, Z., & Willison, R. (2004). Vulnerability Reduction. A Task for the Vulnerable People Themselves. In G. Bankoff, G. Frerks & D. Hilhorst (eds), Mapping Vulnerability. Disasters, Development and People (pp. 145–158). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  61. Dittmer, C. (2007). Gender Mainstreaming in der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit. Eine feministische Kritik. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.Google Scholar
  62. Dittmer, C., Lorenz, D. F., & Voss, M. (2016). Resilience and Vulnerability in the Eye of Pierre Bourdieu. A Theoretical Framework of the Sociology of Disasters (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  63. Dombrowsky, W. R. (1981). Solidaritätsformen während der Schneekatastrophen in Norddeutschland. SIFKU-Informationen, 4(1), 27–38.Google Scholar
  64. Dombrowsky, W. R. (1987). Das Tschernobyl-Syndrom. Katastrophen als verhaltensändernde Ereignisse. In J. Friedrichs (ed.), Deutscher Soziologentag 1986 (pp. 806 ff). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  65. Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1996). Symbols, Positions, Objects. Toward a New Theory of Revolutions and Collective Action. History and Theory: Studies in the Philosophy of History. Online verfügbar unter http://ssc.wisc.edu/~emirbaye/Mustafa_Emirbayer/ARTICLES_files/symbols,%20positions,%20objects.pdf.
  66. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What Is Agency? American Journal of Sociology 103(4), 962–1023.Google Scholar
  67. Endreß, M., & Rampp, B. (2015). Resilienz als Perspektive auf gesellschaftliche Prozesse. Auf dem Weg zu einer soziologsichen Theorie. In M. Endreß & A. Maurer (eds), Resilienz im Sozialen. Theoretische und empirische Analysen (pp. 33–55). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  68. Erikson, K.T. (1976). Everything in Its Path. Destruction of Community in the Buffalo Creek Flood. Simon and Schuster: New York.Google Scholar
  69. Eyre, A. (2006). Remembering. Community Commemoration After Disaster. In H. Rodríguez, E. L. Quarantelli & R. Dynes (eds), Handbook of Disaster Research (pp. 441–455). Springer: New York.Google Scholar
  70. Fazey, I., Kesby, M., Evely, A., Latham, I., Wagatora, D., & Hagasua, J.-E. (2010). A Threetiered Approach to Participatory Vulnerability Assessment in the Solomon Islands. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 713–728.Google Scholar
  71. Flach, F. (1988). Resilience – Discovering a New Strength in Times of Stress. Fawcett Books: NewYork.Google Scholar
  72. Folke, C., Berkes, F., & Colding, J. (1998). Ecological Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience and Sustainability. In F. Berkes & C. Folke (eds), Social and Ecological Systems. Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience (pp. 414–436). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Folke, C., Colding, J., & Berkes, F. (2003). Synthesis. Building Resilience and Adaptive Capacity in Social-Ecological Systems. In F. Berkes, J. Colding & C. Folke (eds), Navigating Social-Ecological Systems. Building Resilience for Complexity and Change (pp. 352–387). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The Emergence of a Perspective for Social–ecological Systems Analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267. DOI:  10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002.
  75. Fooken, I. (2016). Psychologische Aspekte der Resilienzforschung. In R. Wink (ed): Multidisziplinäre Perspektiven der Resilienzforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  76. Fordham, M. (2004). Gendering Vulnerability Analysis. Towards a More Nuanced Approach. In G. Bankoff, G. Frerks & D. Hilhorst (eds), Mapping Vulnerability. Disasters, Development and People (pp. 174–182). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  77. Furedi, F. (2005). Politics of Fear. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  78. Gallopín, G. C. (2006). Linkages between Vulnerability, Resilience, and Adaptive Capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 293–303. DOI:  10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004.
  79. Geenen, E. M. (2012). Gesellschaftliche Verfügung über Kapitalien und Vulnerabilität in konzeptioneller Perspektive. In A. Berlejung (ed.), Disaster and relief management. Katastrophen und ihre Bewaeltigung (pp. 41–65). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  80. Gunderson, L. H. (2003). Interactions between Social Resilience and Ecological Crises. In F. Berkes, J. Colding & C. Folke (eds), Navigating Social-Ecological Systems. Building Resilience for Complexity and Change (pp. 33–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S., & Peterson, G. D. (2002). Surprises and Sustainability: Cycles of Renewal in the Everglades. In L.H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (eds), Panarchy. Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems (pp. 315–332). Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  82. Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S., Pritchard, L., & Peterson, G. D. (1997). Resilience in Ecosystems, Institutions and Societies (Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics Discussion Paper 95), Stockholm.Google Scholar
  83. Gunderson, L. H. (2000). Ecological Resilience—In Theory and Application. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31 1), 425–439. DOI:  10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425.
  84. Hagan, P., & Maguire, B. (2007). Disasters and Communities. Understanding Social Resilience. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 22(2), 16–20.Google Scholar
  85. Hall, P. A., & Lamont, M. (eds) (2013). Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Press.Google Scholar
  86. Handmer, J. W., & Dovers, S. R. (1996). A Typology of Resilience. Rethinking Institutions for Sustainable Development. Organization & Environment, 9(4), 482–511. DOI:  10.1177/108602669600900403.
  87. Heijmans, A. (2004). From Vulnerability to Empowerment. In Greg Bankoff, Georg Frerks und Dorothea Hilhorst (eds), Mapping Vulnerability. Disasters, Development and People. London: Earthscan, 115–127.Google Scholar
  88. Hempel, L., & Lorenz, Daniel F. (2014). Resilience as an Eelement of a Sociology of Expression. Behemoth, 7(2), 26–72.Google Scholar
  89. Hempel, L., & Markwart, T. (2013). Einleitung. Ein Streit über die Katastrophe. In L. Hempel, M. Bartels & T. Markwart (eds), Aufbruch ins Unversicherbare. Zum Katastrophendiskurs der Gegenwart (pp. 7-27). Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
  90. Hewitt, K. (1983). The Idea of Calamity in a Technocratic Age. In Kenneth Hewitt (ed), Interpretations of Calamity from the Viewpoint of Human Ecology (pp. 1–32). Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  91. Hewitt, K. (1997). Regions of Risk. A Geographical Introduction to Disasters. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  92. Hilhorst, D., & Bankoff, G. (2004). Introduction. Mapping Vulnerability. In G. Bankoff, G. Frerks & D. Hilhorst (eds), Mapping Vulnerability. Disasters, Development and People (pp. 1–9). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  93. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1), 1–23. DOI:  10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245.
  94. Holling, C. S., Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1998). Science, Sustainability and Resource Management. In F. Berkes & C. Folke (ed.), Social and Ecological Systems. Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience (pp. 342–362). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Hurlbert, J. S., Beggs, J. J., & Haines, V.A. (2006). Bridges over Troubled Waters. What are the optimal Networks for Katrina’s Victims? http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Hurlbert_Beggs_Haines/IPCC 2007: Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change “Impacts, Adaption and Vulnerability”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  96. IPCC (2014). Working Group II Report “Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability”. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R.E., Turner, B.L., Schiller, A., & Hsiel, W.H. (2005). Vulnerability to Global Environmental Change. In J.X. Kasperson & R.E. Kasperson (ed.), Social Contours of Risk, Vol. II (pp. 245–285). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  98. Kaufmann, S. (2015). Resilienz als Sicherheitsprogramm. um Janusgesicht eines Leitkonzepts. In M. Endreß & A. Maurer (eds.), Resilienz im Sozialen. Theoretische und empirische Analysen (pp. 295–312). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  99. Kimhi, S. (2014). Levels of Resilience: Associations Among Individual, Community, and National Resilience. Journal of Health Psychology, 3, 1-7. Journal of health psychology, 3, 1-7.Google Scholar
  100. Knapp, G.-A. (2001). Grundlagenkritik und stille Post. Zur Debatte um einen Bedeutungsverlust der Kategorie „Geschlecht“. In B. Heintz (ed.), Geschlechtersoziologie (pp. 54-74). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.Google Scholar
  101. Krishnaraj, M. (1997). Gender Issues in Disaster Management. The Latur Earthquake. Gender, Technology and Development, 1(3), 395–411. DOI:  10.1177/097185249700100304.
  102. Levin, S., Barrett, S., Aniyar, S., Baumol, W., Bliss, C., Bolin, B., Dasgupta, P., Ehrlich, P., Folke, C., Gren, I.M., Holling, C.S., Jansson, A.M., Jansson, B.O., Mäler, K.G., Martin, D., Perrings, C., & Sheshinski, E. (1998). Resilience in Natural and Socio-Economic systems. Environment and Development Economics, 3, 222–235.Google Scholar
  103. Leykin, D., Lahad, M., Cohen, O., Goldberg, A., & Aharonson-Daniel, L. (2013). Conjoint Community Resiliency Assessment Measure-28/10 Items (CCRAM28 and CCRAM10). A Self-report Tool for Assessing Community Resilience. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52(3), 313-323.Google Scholar
  104. Lindblom, Charles E. (1959). The Science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88.Google Scholar
  105. Lindseth, B. (2011). The Pre-History of Resilience in Ecological Research, Limn 1.Google Scholar
  106. Luckesch R., Payer H., & Winkler-Rieder W. (2011). Wie gehen Regionen mit Krisen um? Eine explorative Studie über die Resilienz von Regionen, ÖAR Regionalberatung, Fehring.Google Scholar
  107. Macamo, E. (2003). Nach der Katastrophe ist die Katastrophe. Die 2000er Überschwemmung in der dörflichen Wahrnehmung in Mosambik. In L. Clausen, E. Geenen & E. Macamo (eds.), Entsetzliche soziale Prozesse. Theorie und Empirie der Katastrophen (pp. 167–184). Münster: Lit VerlagGoogle Scholar
  108. Manyena, S. B. (2006). The Concept of Resilience Revisited. Disasters, 30(4), 433−450.Google Scholar
  109. McEntire, D., Fuller, C., Johnsten, C.W., & Weber, R. (2002). A Comparison of Disaster Paradigms: The Search for a Holistic Policy Guide. Public Administration Review, 62(3), 267–281.Google Scholar
  110. Meyer, Michelle Annette (2013). Social capital and collective efficacy for disaster resilience: Connecting individuals with communities and vulnerability with resilience in hurricane-prone communities in Florida. Dissertation. Online available http://disaster.colostate.edu/Data/Sites/1/cdra-research/cdra-thesesanddissertations/meyer_michelle.pdf.
  111. Michael, D. N. (1995). Barriers and Bridges to Learning in Turbulent Human Ecology. In L. H. Gunderson, C.S. Holling & S.S. Light (eds), Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecological Systems and Institutions (pp. 461–485). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  112. Midgley, J. (1983). Professional Imperialism. Social Work in the Third World. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  113. Murphy, Brenda L. (2007). Locating Social Capital in Resilient Community-Level Emergency Management. Natural Hazards, 41, 297–315. doi: 10.1007/s11069-006-9036-6
  114. Norgaard, R. B. (1994). Development Betrayed: The End of Progress and a Coevolutionary Revisioning of the Future. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  115. Norris, F. H., & Stevens, S. P. (2007). Community Resilience and the Principles of Mass Trauma Intervention. Psychiatry, 70(4), 320–328.Google Scholar
  116. Norris, F. H., & Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1-2), 127–150.Google Scholar
  117. O’Keefe, P., Westgate, K., & Wisner B (1976). Taking the Naturalness out of Natural Disasters. Nature 260.Google Scholar
  118. O’Keefe, P., Wisner, B., & Baird, A. (1977) Kenyan Underdevelopment: A Case Study of Proletarianisation. In P. O’Keefe, P. & B. Wisner (eds), Landuse and Development (pp. 216-228). London: International African Institute.Google Scholar
  119. Obrist, B., Pfeiffer, C., & Henley, R. (2010). Multi-layered social resilience: A new approach in mitigation research. Progress in Development Studies, 10, 283–293.Google Scholar
  120. Olick, J. K., & Robbins, J. (1998). Social Memory Studies. From “Collective Memory” to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 105–140. DOI:  10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.105.
  121. Oliver-Smith, A. (1996). Anthropological Research on Hazards and Disasters. Annual Revue of Antropology, 25, 303–328.Google Scholar
  122. Oliver-Smith, A. (2004). Theorizing Vulnerability in a Globalized World. A Political Ecology Perspektive. In G. Bankoff, G. Frerks & D. Hilhorst (eds), Mapping Vulnerability. Disasters, Development and People (pp. 10–24). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  123. O’Riordan, T. (1990). Hazard and Risk in the Modern World. Political Models for Programm Design. In J. Handmer & E. Penning-Rowsell (eds), Hazards and the Communication of Risk (pp. 293–302). Brookfield, VT.Google Scholar
  124. Paton, D. (2003). Disaster Preparedness: A Social-cognitive Perspective. Disaster Prevention and Management, 12(3), 210–216. doi:  10.1108/09653560310480686
  125. Paton, D. (2008). Community Resilience: Integrating Individual, Community and Societal Perspectives. In K. Gow & D. Paton (eds), The Phoenix of Natural Disasters: Community Resilience (pp. 13–31). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  126. Paton, D., Smith, L., & Johnston, D. (2005). When Good Intentions Turn Bad: Promoting Natural Hazard Preparedness. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 20(1), 25–30.Google Scholar
  127. Peacock, W., & Ragsdale, G. (2012). Social Systems, Ecological Networks and Disaster. In W. Peacock, H. Galddwin & B. H. Morrow (eds), Hurricane Andrew. Ethnicity, Gender and the Sociology of Disasters (pp. 20-35). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  128. Phillips, B. D., & Fordham, M. (2010). Introduction. In D. Brenda D., D. S. K. Phillips, A. F. Thomas & L. Blinn-Pike (eds), Social Vulnerability to Disasters (pp. 1–23). Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  129. Quarantelli, E. L. (1996). Just as a Disaster is Not Simply a Big Accident, so a Catastrophe Is Not Just a Bigger Disaster. The ASPEP Journal, 68-71.Google Scholar
  130. Quarantelli, E. L. (2000). Emergencies, Disasters and Catastrophes Are Different Phenomena (Disaster Research Center Preliminary Paper 304).Google Scholar
  131. Quarantelli, E. L. (2006). Catastrophes are Different from Disasters: Implications for Crisis Planning and Managing drawn from Katrina. In Understanding Katrina: Perspectives from the Social Sciences. Social Science Research Council. http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Quarantelli/.
  132. Rodríguez, H., Díaz, W., & Santos, J.M. (2006). Communicating Risk and Uncertainty. Science, Technology and Disasters at the Crossroads. In H. Rodríguez, E.L. Quarantelli & R. Dynes (eds.), Handbook of Disaster Research (pp. 476–488). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  133. Scandlyn, J., Simon, C. N., Thomas, D. S.K., & Brett, J. (2010). Theoretical Framing of Worldviews, Values, and Structural Dimensions of Disaster. In B. D. Phillips, D. S.K. Thomas, A. Fothergill & L. Blinn-Pike (Hg.). Social Vulnerability to Disasters (pp. 27–49). Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  134. Scheffer, M., Westley, F., Brock, W.A. et al (2002). Dynamic Interaction of Societies and Ecosystems – Linking Theories form Ecology, Economy, and Sociology. In L.H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (eds), Panarchy. Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems (pp. 195–240). Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  135. Scherr, A. (2012). Soziale Bedingungen von Agency. Soziologische Eingrenzungen einer sozialtheoretisch nicht auflösbaren Paradoxie. In S. Bethmann, C. Helfferich, H. Hoffmann & D. Niermann (eds), Agency. Qualitative Rekonstruktionen und gesellschaftstheoretische Bezüge von Handlungsmächtigkeit (pp. 99–121). Weinheim und Basel: Beltz Juventa.Google Scholar
  136. Schulze, K., Lorenz, D.F., Wenzel, B., & Voss, M. (2015). Disaster Myths and their Relevance for Warning Systems. The 12th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management. http://iscram2015.uia.no/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/4-4.pdf.
  137. Sen, A. (2010). Poverty and Famines. An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  138. Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, Adaptive Capacity and Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 282–292. DOI:  10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008.
  139. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (eds). Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, Chicago: University of Illionois Press.Google Scholar
  140. Sudmeier-Rieux, K. (2015). Resilience – An Emerging Paradigm of Danger or of Hope? Disaster Prevention and Management, 23(1), 67–80.Google Scholar
  141. Swanstrom, T. (2008). Regional Resilience: A Critical Examination of the Ecological Framework. Berkeley, CA : University of California.Google Scholar
  142. Thürmer-Rohr, C. (2001). Gleiche unter Gleichen? Kritische Fragen zu Geschlechterdemokratie und Gender Mainstreaming. Forum Wissenschaft, 2, 34-37.Google Scholar
  143. Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R., & Christensen, Lindsey (2003). A Framework for Vulnerability Analysis in Sustainability Science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100 (14), 8074–8079. DOI:  10.1073/pnas.1231335100.
  144. UN/ISDR (2004). Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015. Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters Genf, UNISDR.Google Scholar
  145. UN/ISDR (2009). 2009 UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva, May 2009 (http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/terminology).
  146. UNISDR (2012). Making Cities Resilient. Report 2012. Genf, UNISDR.Google Scholar
  147. Vale, L. J., & Campanella, T. J. (2005). The Resilient City. How Modern Cities Recover from Disaster. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  148. van Loon, J. (2008). Governmentality and the Subpolitics of Teenage Sexual Risk Behaviour. In A. R. Petersen & I. Wilkinson (eds), Health, Risk and Vulnerability (pp. 48–65). London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  149. Voss, M. (2008). The Vulnerable Can’t Speak. An Integrative Vulnerability Approach to Disaster and Climate Change Research. Behemoth, 1(3).Google Scholar
  150. Voss, M. (2009). Vulnerabilität. In C. Hammerl (ed.), Naturkatastrophen. Rezeption – Bewältigung – Verarbeitung (pp. 103–121). Innsbruck: Studien-Verlag.Google Scholar
  151. Voss, M., & Dittmer, C. (2016). Resilienz aus katastrophensoziologischer Perspektive. In R. Wink (ed.), Multidisziplinäre Perspektiven der Resilienzforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  152. Voss, M., & Funk, L. (2015). Participative Vulnerability and Resilience Assesment and the Example of the Tao People (Taiwan). In F. Krüger (ed.), Cultures and disasters. Understanding cultural framings in disaster risk reduction (pp. 255-276). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  153. Voss, M., & Wagner, K. (2010). Learning from (Small) Disasters. Natural Hazards, 55(3), 657–669. DOI:  10.1007/s11069-010-9498-5.
  154. Walker, J., & Cooper, M. (2011). Genealogies of Resilience: From Systems Ecology to the Political Economy of Crisis Adaptation. Security Dialogue, 42(2), 143-160.Google Scholar
  155. Wallace, D., & Wallace, R. (2008). Urban Systems during Disasters: Factors for Resilience. Ecology and Society, 13(1).Google Scholar
  156. Watts, M. (1983). On the Poverty of Theory: Natural Hazards Research in Context. In K. Hewitt (ed.), Interpretations of Calamity from the Viewpoint of Human Ecology (pp. 229–262). Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  157. Weick, K. E. (1993). The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations. The Mann Gulch Disaster. Administration Science Quarterly, 38, 628–652.Google Scholar
  158. Werner, E. (1971). The Children of Kauai. A Longitudinal Study from the Prenatal Period to Age Ten. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  159. Werner, E. (2005). Resilience and Recovery: Findings from the Kauai Longitudinal Study. Research, Policy, and Practice in Children’s Mental Health, 19, 11-14.Google Scholar
  160. Werner, E., & Smith, R. S. (2001). Journeys from Childhood to Midlife. Risk, Resilience, and Recovery. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  161. Westley, F., Carpenter, S.R., & Brock, W.A. (2002). Why Systems of People and Nature Are Not Just Social and Ecological Systems. In L.H. Gunderson & C.S. Holling (Hg.), Panarchy. Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems (pp. 103–120). Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  162. Wisner, B. (2004). Assessment of Capability and Vulnerability. In G. Bankoff, G. Frerks & D. Hilhorst (eds), Mapping Vulnerability. Disasters, Development and People (pp. 183–193). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  163. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., & Cannon, T. (2003). At Risk. Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. 2. ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  164. Young, O. R., Berkhout, F., Gallopin, G. C., Janssen, M. A., Ostrom, E., & van der Leeuw, S. (2006). The Globalization of Socio-ecological Systems. An Agenda for Scientific Research. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 304–316. DOI:  10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.004.
  165. Zander, M. (2008). Armes Kind – starkes Kind? Die Chance der Resilienz. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  166. Zautra, A., Hall, J., & Murray, K. (2008). Community Development, and Community Resilience: An Integrative Approach. Community Development, 39, 130–147.Google Scholar
  167. Zimmerer, K.S. (1994). Human Geography and the New Ecology: The Prospect and Promise of Integration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84, 108–125.Google Scholar
  168. Zraly, M., Rubin, S. E., & Mukamana, D. (2013). Motherhood and Resilience among Rwandan Genocide-Rape Survivors. Ethos, 41(4), 411–439.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BerlinDeutschland

Personalised recommendations