Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Vergleichende Wahlkampfforschung pp 155–174Cite as

Twitter-Nutzung in den Bundestagswahlkämpfen 2009 und 2013 im Vergleich

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Der Microblogging-Dienst Twitter ist zu einem festen Element politischer Kommunikation in Deutschland geworden. Dennoch sind die Dynamiken politisch relevanter Kommunikation auf Twitter, ihre Verzahnung mit dem politischen Geschehen und der politischen Medienberichterstattung sowie ihre Wirkungen nur unzureichend bekannt. Dieser Beitrag vergleicht die auf Politik bezogene Kommunikation auf Twitter im Verlauf der Bundestagswahlkämpfe 2009 und 2013. Die Darstellung konzentriert sich darauf, welche politischen Ereignisse zu einem Anstieg in politischen Twitter-Nachrichten führten und ob traditionelle oder neue politische Akteure den Kommunikationsraum Twitter in beiden Bundestagswahlkämpfen dominierten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Adam, Silke, & Maier, Michaela (2010). Personalization of Politics. A Critical Review and Agenda for Research. In: Charles T. Salmon (Hrsg.), Communication Yearbook 34 (S. 213-257). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anstead, Nick, & O’Loughlin, Ben (2011). The Emerging Viewertariat and BBC Question Time. Television Debate and Real-Time Commenting Online. The International Journal of Press/Politics 16 (4), 440-462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anstead, Nick, & O’Loughlin, Ben (2012). Semantic Polling. The Ethics of Online Public Opinion.Media Policy Brief 5.The London School of Economics. http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/documents/MPP/Policy-Brief-5-Semantic-Polling_The-Ethics-of-Online-Public-Opinion.pdf. Zugegriffen: 7. Dezember 2014.

  • Anstead, Nick, & O’Loughlin, Ben (2014). Social Media Analysis and Public Opinion. The 2010 UK General Election. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (Online First). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcc4.12102/abstract. Zugegriffen: 7. Dezember 2014.

  • Bennett, W. Lance, & Segerberg, Alexandra (2013). The Logic of Connective Action. Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broersma, Marcel, & Graham, Todd (2012). Social Media as Beat. Tweets as a News Source during the 2010 British and Dutch Elections. Journalism Practice 6 (3), 403-419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, Andrew (2011). Britain’s First Live Televised Party Leaders’ Debate. From the News Cycle to the Political Information Cycle. Parliamentary Affairs 64 (1), 24-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, Andrew (2013). The Hybrid Media System. Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee, Steven H., & Metzger, Miriam J. (2001). The End of Mass Communication? Mass Communication & Society 4 (4), 365-379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip (1964). The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In: David E. Apter (Hrsg.), Ideology and Discontent (S. 206-261). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, Maeve, & Smith, Aaron (2013). Social Media Update. Technical Report Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Social-Media-Update.aspx. Zugegriffen: 7. Dezember 2014.

  • Fuchs, Martin (2013). Social Bundestag. Politik & Kommunikation (November), 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gainous, Jason, & Wagner, Kevin W. (2014). Tweeting to Power. The Social Media Revolution in American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golbeck, Jennifer, Grimes, Justin M., & Rogers, Anthony (2010). Twitter Use by the U.S. Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (8), 1612–1621.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Bailón, Sandra, Borge-Holthoefer, Javier, & Moreno, Yamir (2013). Broadcasters and Hidden Influentials in Online Protest Diffusion. American Behavioural Scientist 57 (7), 943-965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Todd, Broersma, Marcel, Hazelhoff, Karin, & van’t Haar, Guido (2013). Between Broadcasting Political Messages and Interacting with Voters. The Use of Twitter during the 2010 UK General Election Campaign. Information, Communication & Society 16 (5), 692-716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamby, Peter (2013). Did Twitter Kill the Boys on the Bus? Searching for a Better Way to Cover a Campaign. Discussion Paper Series #D-80. Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy. http://shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/d80_hamby.pdf. Zugegriffen: 7. Dezember 2014.

  • Hanna, Alexander, Wells, Chris, Maurer, Peter, Shah, Dhavan V., Friedland, Lewis, & Matthews, Jörg (2013). Partisan Alignments and Political Polarization Online. A Computational Approach to Understanding the French and US Presidential Elections. In: Ingmar Weber, Ana-Maria Popescu, & Marco Pennacchiotti (Hrsg.), PLEAD 2013. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop Politics, Elections and Data. (S. 15-21). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Nigel A., & Lilleker, Darren G. (2011). Microblogging, Constituency Service and Impression Management. UK MPs and the Use of Twitter. The Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (1), 86 -105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungherr, Andreas (2009). Twitternde Politiker: Zwischen buntem Rauschen und Bürgernähe 2.0. In: Christoph Bieber, Martin Eifert, Thomas Groß, & Jörn Lamla (Hrsg.), Soziale Netze in der digitalen Welt. Das Internet zwischen egalitärer Beteiligung und ökonomischer Macht (S. 99-127). Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungherr, Andreas (2012). Online Campaigning in Germany. The CDU Online Campaign for the General Election 2009 in Germany. German Politics 21 (3), 317-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungherr, Andreas (2013a). Schleppender Beginn. Deutsche Politiker entdecken Twitter nur zögerlich. Internationale Politik März/April, 54-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungherr, Andreas (2013b). PLEAD 2013. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop Politics, Elections and Data. (S. 5-14). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungherr, Andreas (2014). The Logic of Political Coverage on Twitter. Temporal Dynamics and Content. Journal of Communication 64 (2), 239-259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungherr, Andreas (2015). Analyzing Political Communication with Digital Trace Data: The Role of Twitter Messages in Social Science Research. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungherr, Andreas (2016). Twitter Use in Election Campaigns: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. (Online First). www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401. Zugegriffen: 30. Januar 2016.

  • Jungherr, Andreas, & Jürgens, Pascal (2014). Through a Glass, Darkly. Tactical Support and Symbolic Association in Twitter Messages Commenting on Stuttgart 21. Social Science Computer Review 32 (1), 74-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungherr, Andreas, & Schoen, Harald (2013). Das Internet in Wahlkämpfen. Konzepte, Wirkungen und Kampagnenfunktionen. Wiesbaden: SpringerVS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungherr, Andreas, Jürgens Pascal, & Schoen, Harald. (2016). The mediation of politics through Twitter: An analysis of messages posted during the campaign for the German federal election 2013. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 21(1), 50-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jürgens, Pascal, & Jungherr, Andreas (2011). Wahlkampf vom Sofa aus. Twitter im Bundestagswahlkampf 2009. In: Eva Johanna Schweitzer, & Steffen Albrecht (Hrsg.), Das Internet im Wahlkampf. Analysen zur Bundestagswahl 2009 (S. 201-225). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jürgens, Pascal, & Jungherr, Andreas (2015). The Use of Twitter During the 2009 German National Election. German Politics 24(4), 469-490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilleker, Darren G., & Jackson, Nigel A. (2010). Towards a More Participatory Style of Election Campaigning. The Impact of Web 2.0 on the UK 2010 General Election. Policy & Internet 2(3), 69-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Yu-Ru, Keegan, Brian, Margolin, Drew, & Lazer, David (2014). Rising Tides or Rising Stars? Dynamics of Shared Attention on Twitter during Media Events. PLoS One 9 (5). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094093

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, Jürgen, Faas, Thorsten, & Maier, Michaela (2013). Mobilisierung durch Fernsehdebatten. Zum Einfluss des TV-Duells 2009 auf die politische Involvierung und die Partizipationsbereitschaft. In: Bernhard Weßels, Harald Schoen, & Oscar W. Gabriel (Hrsg.), Wahlen und Wähler. Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2009 (S. 79-96). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, Michael, & Resnick, David (2000). Politics as Usual. The Cyberspace “Revolution”. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Amy, & Hitlin, Paul (2013). Twitter Reaction to Events often at Odds with Overall Public Opinion. http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/04/twitter-reaction-to-events-often-at-odds-with-overall-public-opinion/. Zugegriffen: 7. Dezember 2014.

  • Neuman, W. Russell (1991). The Future of the Mass Audience. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmelee, John H., & Bichard, Shannon L. (2012). Politics and the Twitter Revolution. How Tweets Influence the Relationship between Political Leaders and the Public. Lanham: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Rolfe D. (2012). To Tweet or not to Tweet. Exploring the Determinants of Early Adoption of Twitter by House Members in the 111th Congress. The Social Science Journal 49 (4), 430-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. (2014). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Wien: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainie, Lee, Smith, Aaron, Lehman Schlozman, Kay, Brady, Henry, & Verba, Sidney (2012). Social Media and Political Engagement. Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Political-engagement.aspx. Zugegriffen: 7. Dezember 2014.

  • Rogers, Richard (2013). Digital Methods. Cambridge. MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, Eva Johanna (2011). Normalisierung 2.0. Die Online-Wahlkämpfe deutscher Parteien zu den Bundestagswahlen 2002–2009. In: Eva Johanna Schweitzer, & Steffen Albrecht (Hrsg.), Das Internet im Wahlkampf. Analysen zur Bundestagswahl 2009 (S. 189-244). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siri, Jasmin, & Seßler, Katharina (2013). Twitterpolitik. Politische Inszenierungen in einem neuen Medium. Institut für Medien- und Kommunikationspolitik & Stiftung Mercator. http://medienpolitik.eu/cms/media/pdf/Twitterpolitik.pdf. Zugegriffen: 7. Dezember 2014.

  • Tenscher, Jens (2014). MPs and the Internet. An Empirically Based Typology. The Journal of Legislative Studies 20 (3), 305-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theocharis, Yannis, Lowe, Will, van Deth, Jan W., & García-Albacete, Gema (2014). Using Twitter to Mobilize Protest Action. Online Mobilization Patterns and Action Repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados, and Aganaktismenoi Movements. Information, Communication & Society (i. E.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaccari, Cristian, Valeriani, Augusto, Barberá, Pablo, Bonneau, Richard, Jost, John T., Nagler, Jonathan, & Tucker, Joshua (2013). Social Media and Political Communication. A Survey of Twitter Users during the 2013 Italian General Election. Rivista Italiana di Scienza 43 (3), 325-355.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eimeren, Birgit, & Frees, Beate (2014). 79 Prozent der Deutschen online. Zuwachs bei mobiler Internetnutzung und Bewegtbild. Media Perspektiven (7-8), 378-396.

    Google Scholar 

  • vom Hofe, Hanna Jo, & Nuernbergk, Christian (2012). Twitter im professionellen Journalismus. Ergebnisse einer Redaktionsbefragung. Journalistik Journal 15 (1), 31-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallsten, Kevin (2014). Microblogging and the News. Political Elites and the Ultimate Retweet. In: Ashu M. G. Solo (Hrsg.), Political Campaigning in the Information Age (S. 128-147). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham, Hadley (2009). Ggplot2. Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mannheim, Deutschland

    Andreas Jungherr

  2. Mainz, Deutschland

    Pascal Jürgens

Authors
  1. Andreas Jungherr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pascal Jürgens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Jungherr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Jens Tenscher

  2. Inst F Kommunikation Mktg Sales, FHWien der WKW, Wien, Austria

    Uta Rußmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jungherr, A., Jürgens, P. (2016). Twitter-Nutzung in den Bundestagswahlkämpfen 2009 und 2013 im Vergleich. In: Tenscher, J., Rußmann, U. (eds) Vergleichende Wahlkampfforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12977-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12977-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-12976-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-12977-4

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation