Abstract
The conditions of school learning change globally. Teachers are faced with the challenge of either using digital media extensively in teacher training and school or allowing its usage. In order to develop an understanding of the meaning of such considerable change, authors first discuss the need for instructional design methods based on the way the users learn. While introducing the concept of instrumental conflict, a theoretical approach is applied, which helps to clarify the core structure of such processes. Finally, the successful example of adoption in the context of pharmaceutical education will be presented.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baron, G.-L. (2011). Learning design. Recherché et formation,68, 109-120.
Bremer, C., Ebner, M., Gumpert, A., Hofhues, S., Döbeli Honegger, B., Köhler, T., Lorenz, A., & H.W. Wollersheim (2016): Mediale Megatrends und die Positionierung der Hochschulen; In: Wachtler, J., Ebner, M., Gröblinger, O., Kopp, M., Bratengeyer, E., Steinbacher, H.-P., Freisleben-Teutscher, C. & Kapper C. (eds.) Digitale Medien: Zusammenarbeit in der Bildung; Reihe: Medien in der Wissenschaft, Band 71; Münster Waxmann.
Cheshire, C. & Antin, J. (2008). The Social Psychological Effects of Feedback on the Production of Internet Information Pools. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00416.x
Cizeron, M. (2010). Le geste professionnel comme concept et outil d’analyse. M. Cizeron & N. Gal-Petitfaux (eds.), Analyse des pratiques: Expérience et gestes professionnels (257-268). Clermont-Ferrand, France: Presses de l’Université Blaise Pascal.
Contamines, J., Georges, S. & Hotte, R. (2003). Approche instrumentale des banques de ressources éducatives. Sciences et Techniques Educatives, hors série, 157-177.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Denami, M. (2016a). Simulation: A powerful tool for training professional skills in cleanrooms. Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy, 1(1), 45-53.
Denami, M. (2016b). Un Serious Game pour le développement des compétences professionnelles des opérateurs en zone aseptique: Définition d’un modèle holistique de conception et études d’usage. PhD. Université de Strasbourg.
Dick, W., Carey, L. & Carey J.O. (2013). Systematic Design of Instruction: Pearson New International Edition [ebook]
Docebo (2016). ELearning market trends and forecast 2014-2016 report. Dubai.
Duval, R. (1995). Sémiosis et pensée humaine. Registres sémiotiques et apprentissages intellectuels. Berne, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
Edwards, R. & Usher, R. (2001). Lifelong learning: A postmodern condition of education? Adult Education Quarterly, 51(4), 273-287.
Esseff, P.J. & Esseff, S.M. (1998). Instructional Development Learning System (IDLS). 8th ed. ESF Press.
European Commission (2011). Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) guidelines. Retrievable at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/documents/eudralex/vol-4/index_en.htm [March 08, 2017].
Fischer, H., Heise, L., Heinz, M., Möbius, K., Köhler, T. (2015): Let’s Look to Future! E-Learning-Trends and Hypes in Academic Teaching. In: EURODL – European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Special Issue Best of EDEN 2013-2014, S. 129-140. Retrievable at: http://www.eurodl.org/materials/special/2015/Zagreb_Fischer_et_al.pdf.
Gartner (2015). The hype cycle. Interpreting Technology Hype. Retrievable at: http://www.gartner.com/technology/research/methodologies/hype-cycle.jsp [March 08, 2017].
Henry, F. (2007). Pratique de design pédagogique et instrumentation du concepteur. M. Baron (ed.), Environnements informatisés et ressources numériques pour l’apprentissage (229-254).Paris: Hermes-Lavoisier.
Kahnwald, N. & Köhler, T. (2007). Microlearning in Virtual Communities of Practice? An explorative analysis of changing information behaviour. Micromedia & eLearning 2.0: Getting the Big Picture. Proceedings of Microlearning 06. Innsbruck: University Press.
Koehler, M.J. & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Köhler, T. & Ihbe, W. (2006). Möglichkeiten und Stand der Nutzung neuer Medientechnologien für die akademische Lehre. Überlegungen zur aktuellen Situation an der TU Dresden; Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Technischen Universität Dresden, 1-2.
Köhler, T. & Kahnwald, N. (2013). Online Communities: Enterprise Networks, Open Education and Global Communication. Proceedings of the GeNeMe 2013; Dresden, TUDPress. Retrievable at: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-153950 [March 08, 2017].
Koper, R. & Tattersall, C. (2005). Learning Design: A Handbook on Modelling and Delivering Networked Education and Training. Springer Verlag: Berlin.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lave J. & Wenger E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Le Monde (2015). Le Monde, [online] 10 October. Retrievable at: http://www.lemonde.fr/lesdecodeurs/article/2015/10/22/le-secteur-automobile-ne-represente-pas-9-des-emploisfrancais_4794416_4355770.html [March 03, 2017].
Merrill, M. D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J. & Pratt, J. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design. Educational Technology. 36 (5), 5–7.Misoch, S. & Köhler, T. (2006). Neue Medien in der Lehrerbildung: Beobachtungen zur aktuellen Nutzung an der Universität Potsdam. In: LLF Berichte, Lernen und Neue Medien, 21.
Moeglin, P. (2005). Les industries éducatives. Paris, France: PUF.
Newzoo (2016). 2016 global games market report. San Francisco.
OECD (2007). Participative Web and User-Created Content: Web 2.0, Wikis and Social Networking; Paris, OECD. Retrievable at:http://browse.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/pdfs/free/9307031e.pdf [September 10, 2015].
Paquette, G. (2002). L’ingénierie pédagogique, pour construire l’apprentissage en réseau. Montreal, Canada: Presse de l’Université du Québec.
Paquette, G. (2014). Technology-based instructional design: Evolution and major trends. J.M. Spector, M.D. Merrill, J. Elen & M.J. Bishop (eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (661-671). New York, NY: Springer.
Peraya, D. (2002). Le cyberespace: Un dispositif de communication et de formation médiatisée. S. Alava (ed.), Cyberespace et formations ouvertes. Vers une mutation des pratiques de formation? (17-44). Brussels, Belgium: De Boeck.
Pscheida, D., Minet, C, Herbst, S, Albrecht, S. & Köhler, T. (2015). Use of Social Media and Online-based Tools in Academia. Results of the Science 2.0-Survey 2014. Dresden: TUD Press. SLUB. Retrievable at: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-191110 [March 09, 2017].
Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies, approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Paris, France: Armand Colin.
Samurçay, R. & Pastré, P. (2010). Recherches en didactique professionnelle. Toulouse, France: Octarès Éditions.
Sharples, M., Adams, A., Alozie, N., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., Gaved, M., McAndrew, P., Means, B., Remold, J., Rienties, B., Roschelle, J., Vogt, K., Whitelock, D. & Yarnall, L. (2015). Innovating pedagogy 2015: Open University innovation report 4. Milton Keynes: Open University.
Stützer, C. M., Breiger, R. & Köhler, T. (2015). Social Academic Analytics in Higher Education. Abstracts of the Sunbelt XXXV International Sunbelt Social Network. Brighton: ISNA Publishers. Retrievable at: http://insna.org/sunbelt2015 [March 09, 2017].
Tattersall, C., Vogten, H., Brouns, F., Koper, R., Van Rosmalen, P, Sloep, P. & Van Bruggen, J. (2003). Delivering courses modelled using IMS Learning Design. Heerlen: OUNL. Retrievable at: http://dspace.ou.nl/bitstream/1820/35/2/LD-delivery.pdf [March 07, 2017].
UNESCO (2014). Education for all global monitoring report. Paris, France: UNESCO.
UNESCO (2015). What are Open Educational Resources? Retrievable at: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/access-to-knowledge/open-educational-resources/what-are-open-educational-resources-oers [March 07, 2017].
UNESCO (2016). Education 2030 – Incheon Declaration. Paris, France: UNESCO.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marquet, P., Köhler, T. (2018). The Empowerment of Users: Rethinking Educational Practice Online. In: Dobrick, F., Fischer, J., Hagen, L. (eds) Research Ethics in the Digital Age. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-12908-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-12909-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)