Skip to main content

Journalists on Twitter: Reconfiguring Professional Identity, Reconsidering Research Ethics – The Case of Croatia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Research Ethics in the Digital Age

Abstract

This paper aims to discuss the extent and potential consequences of the blurring line between professional and private activity of journalists on social media: if and how is this challenging traditional journalistic norms and routines, but also if and how this could stand as an ethical issue for researchers. The study first utilizes netnography as a method to notice potential trends and conflicts that were then used to define categories of the content analysis of tweets posted or shared by journalists in Croatia. Finally, in-depth interviews will be conducted with journalists that show to be most (pro)active in their use of Twitter. The preliminary observations suggest the shift towards more transparency and personalization. However, there is also a tendency of normalization, in particular with the gatekeeping role

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agócs, C. (1997). Institutionalized Resistance to Organizational Change: Denial, Inaction and Repression. Journal of Business Ethics, 16 (9), 917-931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, L. (2014). From traditional gatekeeper to professional verifier: how local newspaper journalists are adapting to change. Journalism Education: The Journal of the Association of Journalism Education, 3 (1), 102-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6(4), 442-464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evetts, J. (2014). The Concept of Professionalism: Professional Work, Professional Practice and Learning. In S. Billett, C. Harteis & H Gruber (Eds.), International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredriksson, M. & Johansson, B. (2014). The Dynamics of Professional Identity. Journalism Practice, 8(5), 585-595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godkin, P. (2008). Rethinking Journalism as a Profession. Canadian Journal of Media Studies, 4(1), 109-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, P. & Elliott, P. (1979). Making the News. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hladík, R. & Štětka, V. (2015). The Powers that Tweet: Social media as news sources in the Czech Republic. Journalism Studies. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2015.1046995

  • Klimes, D. (2016). Understanding Journalists on Twitter: The Czech Case. Strategic Innovative Marketing, part of the series Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, pp 219-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovach, B. & Rosenstiel, T. (2001). The Elements of Journalism. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasorsa, D. L., Lewis, S. C. & Holton, A. E. (2012). Normalizing Twitter. Journalism Studies, 13(1), 19-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauk, E. (2008). How will it all unfold? Media systems and journalism cultures in post-communist countries. In K. Jakubowicz & M. Sukosd (Eds.), Finding the Right Place on the Map: Central and Eastern European Media Change in Global Perspective. UK: Intellect Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, M. & Resnick, D. (2000). Politics as usual: The cyberspace revolution. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, D. (1995) Public Journalism – Defining a Democratic Art. Media Studies Journal, 9(3), 125–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygren, G. & Stigbrand, K. (2014). The Formation of a Professional Identity. Journalism Studies, 15(6), 841-858, DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2013.834163.

  • Peters, J. & Tandoc, E. C. Jr. (2013). “People who aren’t really reporters at all, who have no professional qualifications”: Defining a Journalist and deciding who may claim the Privileges. N.Y.U. Journal of Legislation and Public Policy QUORUM 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, S. D. & Ballinger, J. (2001). The Roots of a Sociology of News: Remembering Mr. Gates and Social Control in the Newsroom. Journalism and Media Quarterly, 78(4), 641-658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, T. C. (1998). Organizational and Professional Identification: A Case of Newspaper Journalists. Management Communication Quarterly, 12(1), 72–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, M. (2003). The sociology of news. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, P. J. (1991). Gatekeeping: Communication concepts 3. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. B. (2005). The political j-blogger “normalizing” a new media form to fit old norms and practices. Journalism, 6(2), 173-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloski, J. (1990). News Reporting and Professionalism: Some Constraints on the Reporting of the News. Media, Culture and Society, 11(4), 207–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, G. (2002). The Production of News. In K. Jensen (Eds.) A Handbook of Media and Communication Research (pp 78-90). London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vobic, I., Maksuti, A. & Dezelan T. (2016). Who Leads the Twitter Tango? Studying the journalist–politician relationship in Slovenia through Twitter conversations. Digital Journalism. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2016.1259002

  • Wenger, E. (2006). Communities of Practice. Available at: http://www.ewenger.com.

  • Wiik, J. (2009). Identities under construction: professional journalism in a phase of destabilization, International Review of Sociology, 19(2), 351-365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, B. (2005). Definitions of journalism. In G. Overholser & K. Hall Jamieson (Eds.), The Press. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, B. (2009). Journalism and the academy. In K.Wahl-Jorgensen &T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York & London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iva Nenadic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nenadic, I. (2018). Journalists on Twitter: Reconfiguring Professional Identity, Reconsidering Research Ethics – The Case of Croatia. In: Dobrick, F., Fischer, J., Hagen, L. (eds) Research Ethics in the Digital Age. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-12908-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-12909-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics