Advertisement

Entscheidungszeiten als Hinweise auf Gedächtnisprozesse

  • Hellmuth Metz-Göckel
Chapter
Part of the Schlüsseltexte der Psychologie book series (SCHTP)

Zusammenfassung

Der folgende Beitrag von Meyer & Schvaneveldt (1971) gehört in die Reihe von frühen, kognitionspsychologisch sehr wichtigen Untersuchungen, deren Ziel es war, Aufschluss über Gedächtnisstrukturen und die zugrundeliegenden Prozesse zu erhalten. Als Kriterien wurden meist Antwortlatenzen verwandt, also etwa die Reaktionszeiten bei bestimmten semantischen Entscheidungen. Der dokumentierten Studie ist die Untersuchungsanordnung entnommen, die gerne in Lehrbüchern dargestellt wird.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BOUSFIELD, W. A., COHEN, B. H., WHITMARSH, G. A., & KINCAID, W. D. The Connecticut free associational norms. (Tech. Rep. No. 35) Storrs, Conn.: University of Connecticut, 1961.Google Scholar
  2. COLLINS, A. M., & QUILLIAN, M. R. Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969, 8, 240–247.Google Scholar
  3. COLLINS, A. M., & QUILLIAN, M. R. Facilitating retrieval from semantic memory: The effect of repeating part of an inference. In A. F. Sanders (Ed.), Attention and performance III. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1970.Google Scholar
  4. KUCERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. N. Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, R. I.: Brown University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  5. LANDAUER, T. K., & FREEDMAN, J. L. Information retrieval from long-term memory: Category size and recognition time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1968, 7, 291–295.Google Scholar
  6. McCORMICK, E. M. Digital computer primer. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.Google Scholar
  7. MEYER, D. E. On the representation and retrieval of stored semantic information. Cognitive Psychology, 1970, 1, 242–300.Google Scholar
  8. MEYER, D. E. Dual memory-search of related and unrelated semantic categories. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York, April 1971.Google Scholar
  9. MEYER, D. E., & ELLIS, G. B. Parallel processes in word recognition. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Antonio, November 1970.Google Scholar
  10. NORMAN, D. A. Comments on the information structure of memory. In A. F. Sanders (Ed.), Attention and performance HI. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1970.Google Scholar
  11. OLDFIELD, R. C. Things, words and the brain. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 18, 340–353.Google Scholar
  12. RUBENSTEIN, H., GARFIELD, L., & MlLLIKAN, J. A. Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970, 9, 487–494.Google Scholar
  13. SCHAEFFER, B., & WALLACE, R. Semantic similarity and the comparison of word meanings. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 82, 343–346.Google Scholar
  14. SCHAEFFER, B., & WALLACE, R. The comparison of word meanings. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 86, 144–152.Google Scholar
  15. SHIFFRIN, R. M., & ATKINSON, R. C. Storage and retrieval processes in long-term memory. Psychological Review, 1969, 76, 179–193.Google Scholar
  16. SWANSON, J. M., & WICKENS, D. D. Preprocessing on the basis of frequency of occurrence. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 22, 378–383.Google Scholar
  17. STERNBERG, S. Memory scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist, 1969, 57, 421–457.Google Scholar
  18. WARREN, R. E. Stimulus encoding and memory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1970.Google Scholar
  19. WINER, B. J. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FR PsychologieUniversität DortmundDortmundDeutschland

Personalised recommendations