Zusammenfassung
Um die Zukunftsfähigkeit eines Unternehmens zu sichern, muss der Arbeitsplatz der Zukunft ein Workspace für Wissens- und Innovationsarbeiter sein. In diesem Beitrag wird gezeigt, wie Innovation, Wissen, Organisation und Raum beziehungsweise Büro zusammenhängen. Ausgehend von einer Darstellung des Konzeptes der Innovation wird deutlich, dass kognitive Prozesse für alle Formen von Wissens- und Innovationsprozessen verantwortlich sind und dass diese niemals ohne die sie umgebenden Rahmenbedingungen (Raum, Organisation, soziale Strukturen) verstanden werden können. Innovation kann demnach nur ermöglicht und nicht „gemacht“ werden. Notwendig ist es, eben diese „Ermöglicher“ zu verstehen und zu einem ganzheitlichen Organisations- und Raumkonzept für den Arbeitsplatz der Zukunft zu integrieren. Aus der Darstellung der „Ermöglicher“ werden die Konsequenzen für die Gestaltung von Workspaces abgeleitet und praktische Implikationen, Handlungsempfehlungen sowie konkrete Beispiele vorgestellt.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Adolf, M., & Stehr, N. (2014). Knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge.
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Allen, T. J., & Henn, G. W. (2007). The organization of architecture and innovation. Managing the flow of technology. Amsterdam: Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier.
Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview Press.
Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339.
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–93.
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design. How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Collins.
Catmull, E. (2008). How Pixar fosters collective creativity. https://hbr.org/2008/09/how-pixar-fosters-collective-creativity. Zugegriffen: 12. Sept. 2015.
Chesbrough, H. W., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Churchland, P. M. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind. Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33(3), 44–54.
Coughlan, P., Suri, J. F., & Canales, K. (2007). Prototypes as (design) tools for behavioral and organizational change. A design-based approach to help organizations change work behaviors. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(1), 1–13.
Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation. Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5), 693–716.
Dodgson, M., & Gann, D. (2010). Innovation. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dorst, K. (2003). The problem of design problems. In N. Cross & E. Edmonds (Hrsg.), Expertise in design (S. 135–147). Sydney: Creativity and Cognition Studio Press.
Dorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues (National Council of State Boards of Nursing (U. S.)), 22(3), 4–17.
Drucker, P. F. (1988). The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review, 66, 45–53.
Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-capitalist society. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
d.school. (2010). Design thinking bootcamp bootleg. Methodbook. Stanford: d.school, Hasso Platter, Institute of Design.
Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, crowds, and markets. Reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & O’Keefe, R. D. (1984). Organisational strategic and structural differences for radical vs. incremental innovation. Management Science, 30(6), 682–695.
European Commission. (1995). Green paper on innovation. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2004). Innovation management and the knowledge-driven economy. Brussels: European Commission. (Directorate-general for Enterprise)
Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies. The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy, 38(2), 218–233.
Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (Hrsg.). (2006). The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fayard, A. L., & Weeks, J. (2007). Photocopiers and water-coolers: The affordances of informal interaction. Organization Studies, 28(5), 605–634.
Felin, T., Kauffman, S. A., Koppl, R., et al. (2014). Economic opportunity and evolution: Beyond landscapes and bounded rationality. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(4), 269–282.
Friedenberg, J., & Silverman, G. (2006). Cognitive science. An introduction to the study of the mind. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Friedman, T. L. (2006). The world is flat. A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Ferrar, Straus and Giroux.
Gedenryd, H. (1998). How designers work. Lund: Lund University Cognitive Studies.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.
Houde, S., & Hill, C. (1997). What do prototypes prototype?. In M. Helander, T. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Hrsg.), Handbook of human-computer interaction. Second (S. 367–381). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kauffman, S. A. (2014). Prolegomenon to patterns in evolution. BioSystems, 123(2014), 3–8.
Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Hrsg.). (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kelley, T. (2004). The art of innovation. Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America’s leading design firm. London: Profile Books.
Koppl, R., Kauffman, S. A., Felin, T., et al. (2014). Economics for a creative world. Journal of Institutional Economics, 2014, 1–31.
Krogh, G. v., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation. How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Laurel, B.. (Hrsg.). (2003). Design research. Methods and perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Leifer, R. (2000). Radical innovation. How mature companies can outsmart upstarts. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Menary, R. (Hrsg.). (2010). The extended mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Moggridge, B., Suri, J. F., & Bray, D. (2007). People and prototypes. In B. Moggridge (Hrsg.), Designing interactions (S. 641–735). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of „ba“: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. How Japanese companies manage the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
O’Connor, G. C., & McDermott, C. M. (2004). The human side of radical innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1–2), 11–30. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.002.
Onarheim, B. (2012). Creativity from constraints in engineering design: Lessons learned at Coloplast. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(4), 323–336.
Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2008a). Emergent innovation and sustainable knowledge co-creation. A socio-epistemological approach to „Innovation from within“. In M. D. Lytras, J. M. Carroll, E. Damiani, et al. (Hrsg.), The open knowledge society: A computer science and information systems manifesto (S. 101–108). New York: Springer (CCIS 19).
Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2012a). Spaces enabling game-changing and sustaining innovations: Why space matters for knowledge creation and innovation. Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change (OTSC), 9(1), 41–61.
Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2012b). Vom „digital turn“ zum „socio-epistemological creative turn“. Räume der Ermöglichung von Innovation und Wissensgenerierung. In B. Kossek & M. F. Peschl (Hrsg.), Digital Turn? Zum Einfluss digitaler Medien auf Wissensgenerierungsprozesse von Studierenden und Hochschullehrenden (S. 47–62). Göttingen: V & R unipress.
Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2014a). Designing and enabling interfaces for collaborative knowledge creation and innovation. From managing to enabling innovation as socio-epistemological technology. Computers and Human Behavior, 37, 346–359.
Peschl, M. F., & Fundneider, T. (2014b). Why space matters for collaborative innovation networks. On designing enabling spaces for collaborative knowledge creation. International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering (IJODE), 3(3/4), 358–391.
Peschl, M. F., Raffl, C., Fundneider, T., et al. (2010).Creating sustainable futures by innovation from within. Radical change is in demand of radical innovation. In R. Trappl (Hrsg.), Cybernetics and Systems 2010 (S. 354–359). Wien.
Poli, R. (2006). The ontology of what is not there. In J. Malinowski & A. Pietruszczak (Hrsg.), Essays in logic and ontology (Poznan studies in the philosophy of the sciences and the humanities, vol. 91) (S. 73–80). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
SAP. (2015). https://experience.sap.com/designservices/apphaus. Zugegriffen: 9. Sept. 2015.
Scharmer, C. O. (2001). Self-transcending knowledge. Sensing and organizing around emerging opportunities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(2), 137–150.
Scharmer, C. O. (2007). Theory U. Leading from the future as it emerges. The social technology of presencing. Cambridge: Society for Organizational Learning.
Steup, M. (2012). Epistemology. In E. N. Zalta (Hrsg.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/.
Stokes, P. D. (2005). Creativity from constraints. The psychology of breakthrough. New York: Springer.
Stokes, P. D. (2007). Using constraints to generate and sustain novelty. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 107–113.
Tedlock, B. (2005). Ethnography and ethnographic representation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Third (S. 455–486). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
UNESCO. (2005). Towards knowledge societies. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO World Report).
Varela, F. J. (1990). Kognitionswissenschaft – Kognitionstechnik. Eine Skizze aktueller Perspektiven. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Peschl, M., Fundneider, T. (2016). Büro als Treiber von Wissens- und Innovationsprozessen. In: Klaffke, M. (eds) Arbeitsplatz der Zukunft. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12606-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12606-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-12605-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-12606-3
eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)