Abstract
Innovation processes in land-use systems require land-users to change their management actions. Understanding land-users’ management actions requires understanding of how land-users regulate their system i.e. how they achieve what they want to achieve. Their management is based on their experience, which remains usually hidden to scientists, as it is usually not explained (made explicit) to third parties, either due to the lack of necessity within the production process, or, because the underlying knowledge / experience is implicit and insufficiently formalised to make it explicit. In this chapter we will present a methodology based on second-order cybernetics to model land users’ regulation of the production process and thereby transform their experience and their underlying knowledge into information for science.
Using this methodology permits to identify the observations, which landusers make when controlling the production process. Hence it enables learning about different aspects and characteristics of the respective controlled processes of production systems, and about the production environment that matter – i.e. are decisive for the land-users actions. Beyond this, the methodology also permits identifying the rules behind land users’ actions, which reveals cause-effect relations and points at characteristics of the production environment, which a) have shaped the system (restrictions), and b) are considered as problems (disturbances) by the land users. Once transformed into information, land-users’ experience can be used in knowledge integration processes, as employed in transdisciplinary research, where the different system views of different stakeholders such as e.g. scientists and practitioners are combined to develop innovations that fit into the system. This is much needed in the design of development projects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Ashby, W. R. (1974): Einführung in die Kybernetik. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
Bateson, G. (1983): Ökologie des Geistes: Anthropologische, psychologische, biologische und epistemologische Perspektiven. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
Bauer, M. (1996): The narrative interview: comment s on a technique of qualitative data collection. In: Papers in Social Research Methods – Qualitative Series. Vol. 1, London, UK: London School of Economics, Methodology Institute.
Bawden, R. J., Macadam, R. D., Packham, R. J. & Valentine, I. (1984): Systems Thinking and Practices in the Education of Agriculturalists. In: Agricultural Systems. Vol. 13, pp. 205–225.
Béranger, C. & Vissac, B. (1993): An holistic approach to livestock farming systems. Theoretical and methodological aspects. In: Brossier, J., Bonneval, L. D. & Landais, E. (Eds.): Systems studies in agriculture and rural development. Paris, France: INRA, pp. 149–164.
Briske, D. D., Zhao, M., Han, G., Xiu, C., Kemp, D. R., Willms, W., Havstad, K., Kang, L., Wang, Z., Wu, J., Han, X. & Bai, Y. (2015): Strategies to alleviate poverty and grassland degra-dation in Inner Mongolia: Intensification vs production efficiency of livestock systems. In: Journal of Environmental Management. Vol. 152, pp. 177–182.
Coughenour, C. M. (1984): Social ecology and agriculture. In: Rural Sociology. Vol. 49, pp. 1–22.
Dillon, J. L. (1992): The Farm as a Purposeful System. In: Miscellaneous Publication. No. 10, Armidale, Australia: Department of Agricultural Economics and Business Management, University of New England.
Esser, H. (2002): Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. Bd. 1: Situationslogik und Handeln. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag.
Fairweather, J. (2010): Farmer models of socio-ecologic systems: Application of causal mapping across multiple locations. In: (2010): Ecological Modelling. Vol. 221, pp. 555–562.
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S. & Walker, B. (2002): Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. In: AMBIO. Vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 437–440.
Gliessman, S. R. (2007): Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food system. Second Edition. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press.
Hildebrand P. E. & Waugh, R. K. (1986): Farming systems research and development. In: Hildebrand, P. E. (Eds.): Perspectives of Farming Systems Research and extension. pp. 12–16, Boulder, Colorado, USA: Lynne Rienner.
Hubert, B. (1993): Modelling pastoral land-use practices. In: Brossier, J., Bonneval, L. D. & Landais, E. (Eds.): Systems studies in agriculture and rural development. Paris, France: INRA, pp. 235–258.
Ison, R. & Russel, D. (2005): Agricultural extension and rural development. Breaking out of traditions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Janssen M. A., Anderies J. M. & Ostrom E. (2007): Robustness of social-ecological systems to spatial and temporal variability. In: Society & Natural Resources. Vol. 20, pp. 307–322.
Kaufmann, B. A. (2005): Precision livestock farming in developing countries: creating order where uncertainty prevails. In: Cox, E. (Eds.): Precision Livestock Farming ’05. Wageningen: Academic Publishers, pp. 327–336.
Kaufmann, B. A. (2011): Second-order cybernetics as a tool to understand why pastoralists do what they do. In: Agricultural Systems. Vol. 104, pp. 655–665.
Kaufmann, B., Nelson, W., Gudere, R., Canger, V., Golicha, D., Frank, M., Roba, H., Mwai, O. & Hülsebusch C. (2012): Identifying local innovations in pastoral areas in Marsabit County, Kenya. Witzenhausen, Germany: German Institute for Tropical and Subtropical Agriculture (DITSL).
Keating, B. A. & McCown, R. L. (2001): Advances in farming systems analysis and intervention. In: Agricultural Systems. Vol. 70, pp. 555–579.
Kremen, C., Iles, A. & Bacon, C. (2012): Diversified Farming Systems: An Agroecological, Systemsbased Alternative to Modern Industrial Agriculture. Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on A Social-Ecological Analysis of Diversified Farming Systems: Benefits, Costs, Obstacles, and Enabling Policy Frameworks. In: Ecology and Society. Vol. 17, no. 4, p. 44.
Luhmann, N. (2004): Einführung in die Systemtheorie. Heidelberg, Germany: Carl-Auer-Systeme.
Norman, D. (2000): A personal evolution. In: Collinson, M. P. (Eds.): A history of Farming Systems Research. Pp. 30–33, Wallingford: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), CAB International. Osty, P. L. & Landais, E. (1993): Functioning of pastoral farming systems. In: Brossier, J., Bonneval,
L. D. & Landais, E. (Eds.): Systems studies in agriculture and rural development. Paris, France: INR, pp. 201–214.
Porter, J. & Rasmussen, J. (2009): Agriculture and Technology. In: Berg Olsen, J. K., Pedersen, S. A. & Hendricks, V. F. (Eds.): A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., ch. 48.
Puppe, F. (1991): Wissensrepräsentation mit Regeln. In: Struss, P. (Eds.): Wissensrepräsentationen. München, Germany: Oldenbourg Verlag, pp. 123–130.
Sørensen, J. T. & Kristensen, E. S. (1992): Systemic modelling: a research methodology in livestock farming. In: Global appraisal of livestock farming systems and study on their organizational levels: Concept, methodology and results. Brussels, Belgium: Commission of the European Community, pp. 45–57.
Spedding, C. R. W. (1988): An introduction to agricultural systems. London, New York, USA: Elsevier Applied Science.
Von Foerster, H. (1982): Observing systems. Seaside, California, USA: Intersystems publications. Werner, M. (2010): Fulani agro-pastoralists’ production strategies: Adaptation to climate variability in Mopti region, Mali. MSc thesis DITSL Witzenhausen, University of Göttingen, Germany.
Werner, M., Diarra, L., Hülsebusch, C. & Kaufmann, B. (2010): Securing Food Supply by Adapting Millet Growing to Climate Variability: Decision Making Rules of Fulani Agro-pastoralists in Mopti Region, Mali. Book of Abstracts, Tropentag 2010. ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
Willke, H. (1994): Systemtheorie II: Interventionstheorie. Stuttgart, Germany: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
Willke, H. (2001): Systemisches Wissensmanagement. Stuttgart, Germany: Lucius & Lucius.
Winter, W. (1999): Theorie des Beobachters: Skizzen zur Architektonik eines Metatheoriesystems. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Neue Wissenschaft.
Woodhill, J. & Röling, N. G. (1998): The second wing of the eagle: the human dimension in learning our way to more sustainable futures. In: Röling, N. G. & Wagemakers, M. A. E. (Hrsg.): Facilitating sustainable agriculture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 46–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaufmann, B., Hülsebusch, C. (2015). Employing Cybernetics in Social Ecological Systems Research. In: Jeschke, S., Schmitt, R., Dröge, A. (eds) Exploring Cybernetics. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11755-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11755-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-11754-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-11755-9
eBook Packages: Computer Science and Engineering (German Language)