Skip to main content

Employing Cybernetics in Social Ecological Systems Research

Transforming Experience of Land Users into Information for Scientists

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Exploring Cybernetics

Abstract

Innovation processes in land-use systems require land-users to change their management actions. Understanding land-users’ management actions requires understanding of how land-users regulate their system i.e. how they achieve what they want to achieve. Their management is based on their experience, which remains usually hidden to scientists, as it is usually not explained (made explicit) to third parties, either due to the lack of necessity within the production process, or, because the underlying knowledge / experience is implicit and insufficiently formalised to make it explicit. In this chapter we will present a methodology based on second-order cybernetics to model land users’ regulation of the production process and thereby transform their experience and their underlying knowledge into information for science.

Using this methodology permits to identify the observations, which landusers make when controlling the production process. Hence it enables learning about different aspects and characteristics of the respective controlled processes of production systems, and about the production environment that matter – i.e. are decisive for the land-users actions. Beyond this, the methodology also permits identifying the rules behind land users’ actions, which reveals cause-effect relations and points at characteristics of the production environment, which a) have shaped the system (restrictions), and b) are considered as problems (disturbances) by the land users. Once transformed into information, land-users’ experience can be used in knowledge integration processes, as employed in transdisciplinary research, where the different system views of different stakeholders such as e.g. scientists and practitioners are combined to develop innovations that fit into the system. This is much needed in the design of development projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Ashby, W. R. (1974): Einführung in die Kybernetik. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1983): Ökologie des Geistes: Anthropologische, psychologische, biologische und epistemologische Perspektiven. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M. (1996): The narrative interview: comment s on a technique of qualitative data collection. In: Papers in Social Research Methods – Qualitative Series. Vol. 1, London, UK: London School of Economics, Methodology Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawden, R. J., Macadam, R. D., Packham, R. J. & Valentine, I. (1984): Systems Thinking and Practices in the Education of Agriculturalists. In: Agricultural Systems. Vol. 13, pp. 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béranger, C. & Vissac, B. (1993): An holistic approach to livestock farming systems. Theoretical and methodological aspects. In: Brossier, J., Bonneval, L. D. & Landais, E. (Eds.): Systems studies in agriculture and rural development. Paris, France: INRA, pp. 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briske, D. D., Zhao, M., Han, G., Xiu, C., Kemp, D. R., Willms, W., Havstad, K., Kang, L., Wang, Z., Wu, J., Han, X. & Bai, Y. (2015): Strategies to alleviate poverty and grassland degra-dation in Inner Mongolia: Intensification vs production efficiency of livestock systems. In: Journal of Environmental Management. Vol. 152, pp. 177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughenour, C. M. (1984): Social ecology and agriculture. In: Rural Sociology. Vol. 49, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J. L. (1992): The Farm as a Purposeful System. In: Miscellaneous Publication. No. 10, Armidale, Australia: Department of Agricultural Economics and Business Management, University of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, H. (2002): Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. Bd. 1: Situationslogik und Handeln. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. (2010): Farmer models of socio-ecologic systems: Application of causal mapping across multiple locations. In: (2010): Ecological Modelling. Vol. 221, pp. 555–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S. & Walker, B. (2002): Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. In: AMBIO. Vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 437–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman, S. R. (2007): Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food system. Second Edition. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand P. E. & Waugh, R. K. (1986): Farming systems research and development. In: Hildebrand, P. E. (Eds.): Perspectives of Farming Systems Research and extension. pp. 12–16, Boulder, Colorado, USA: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, B. (1993): Modelling pastoral land-use practices. In: Brossier, J., Bonneval, L. D. & Landais, E. (Eds.): Systems studies in agriculture and rural development. Paris, France: INRA, pp. 235–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison, R. & Russel, D. (2005): Agricultural extension and rural development. Breaking out of traditions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen M. A., Anderies J. M. & Ostrom E. (2007): Robustness of social-ecological systems to spatial and temporal variability. In: Society & Natural Resources. Vol. 20, pp. 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, B. A. (2005): Precision livestock farming in developing countries: creating order where uncertainty prevails. In: Cox, E. (Eds.): Precision Livestock Farming ’05. Wageningen: Academic Publishers, pp. 327–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, B. A. (2011): Second-order cybernetics as a tool to understand why pastoralists do what they do. In: Agricultural Systems. Vol. 104, pp. 655–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, B., Nelson, W., Gudere, R., Canger, V., Golicha, D., Frank, M., Roba, H., Mwai, O. & Hülsebusch C. (2012): Identifying local innovations in pastoral areas in Marsabit County, Kenya. Witzenhausen, Germany: German Institute for Tropical and Subtropical Agriculture (DITSL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, B. A. & McCown, R. L. (2001): Advances in farming systems analysis and intervention. In: Agricultural Systems. Vol. 70, pp. 555–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremen, C., Iles, A. & Bacon, C. (2012): Diversified Farming Systems: An Agroecological, Systemsbased Alternative to Modern Industrial Agriculture. Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on A Social-Ecological Analysis of Diversified Farming Systems: Benefits, Costs, Obstacles, and Enabling Policy Frameworks. In: Ecology and Society. Vol. 17, no. 4, p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2004): Einführung in die Systemtheorie. Heidelberg, Germany: Carl-Auer-Systeme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (2000): A personal evolution. In: Collinson, M. P. (Eds.): A history of Farming Systems Research. Pp. 30–33, Wallingford: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), CAB International. Osty, P. L. & Landais, E. (1993): Functioning of pastoral farming systems. In: Brossier, J., Bonneval,

    Google Scholar 

  • L. D. & Landais, E. (Eds.): Systems studies in agriculture and rural development. Paris, France: INR, pp. 201–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J. & Rasmussen, J. (2009): Agriculture and Technology. In: Berg Olsen, J. K., Pedersen, S. A. & Hendricks, V. F. (Eds.): A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., ch. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puppe, F. (1991): Wissensrepräsentation mit Regeln. In: Struss, P. (Eds.): Wissensrepräsentationen. München, Germany: Oldenbourg Verlag, pp. 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, J. T. & Kristensen, E. S. (1992): Systemic modelling: a research methodology in livestock farming. In: Global appraisal of livestock farming systems and study on their organizational levels: Concept, methodology and results. Brussels, Belgium: Commission of the European Community, pp. 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spedding, C. R. W. (1988): An introduction to agricultural systems. London, New York, USA: Elsevier Applied Science.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Von Foerster, H. (1982): Observing systems. Seaside, California, USA: Intersystems publications. Werner, M. (2010): Fulani agro-pastoralists’ production strategies: Adaptation to climate variability in Mopti region, Mali. MSc thesis DITSL Witzenhausen, University of Göttingen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, M., Diarra, L., Hülsebusch, C. & Kaufmann, B. (2010): Securing Food Supply by Adapting Millet Growing to Climate Variability: Decision Making Rules of Fulani Agro-pastoralists in Mopti Region, Mali. Book of Abstracts, Tropentag 2010. ETH Zurich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke, H. (1994): Systemtheorie II: Interventionstheorie. Stuttgart, Germany: Gustav Fischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke, H. (2001): Systemisches Wissensmanagement. Stuttgart, Germany: Lucius & Lucius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, W. (1999): Theorie des Beobachters: Skizzen zur Architektonik eines Metatheoriesystems. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Neue Wissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhill, J. & Röling, N. G. (1998): The second wing of the eagle: the human dimension in learning our way to more sustainable futures. In: Röling, N. G. & Wagemakers, M. A. E. (Hrsg.): Facilitating sustainable agriculture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 46–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brigitte Kaufmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaufmann, B., Hülsebusch, C. (2015). Employing Cybernetics in Social Ecological Systems Research. In: Jeschke, S., Schmitt, R., Dröge, A. (eds) Exploring Cybernetics. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11755-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics