Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Healthy Justice pp 189–205Cite as

Vergebung und Restorative Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Im dem Beitrag wird diskutiert, welche Rolle die Vergebung bei der kriminaljustiziell veranlassten Versöhnung – etwa im Rahmen eines Täter-Opfer-Ausgleiches – spielt. Aus psychologischer, philosophischer und pragmalinguistischer Sicht wird beleuchtet, was Vergebung eigentlich ist. Schließlich wird erörtert, inwiefern die Figur der Vergebung dem Anliegen einer als heilsam angesehenen Restorative Justice inhaltlich zu entsprechen vermag und welche kritischen Aspekte hierbei zu berücksichtigen sind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Ahmed, E. & Braithwaite, J. (2005). Forgiveness, Shaming, Shame and Bullying. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 38, 298-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allers, C. R. (2010). Undoing what has been done: Arendt and Levinas on forgiveness. In C. R. Allers & M. Smit (Hrsg.), Forgiveness in perspective (S. 19-42). Amsterdam u.a.: Editions Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allers, C. R. & Smit, M. (2010). Putting forgiveness in perspective, In: C. R. Allers & M. Smit (Hrsg.), Forgiveness in perspective (S. ix-xviii). Amsterdam u.a.: Editions Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkin, R., Harris, N., Freeman, S. & Huntington, S. (2014). The Forgiveness Reconciliation Inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in counseling and development 47, 3-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C. (2008). The apology ritual: A philosophical theory of punishment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, M. (2010). Vengefulness as a discredited emotion. In I. Urlić, M. Berger & A. Berman (Hrsg.), Victimhood, vengefulness, and the culture of forgiveness (S. 61-84). New York: Nova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blustein, J. M. (2014). Forgiveness and remembrance: Remembering wrongdoing in personal and public life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolivar, D., Aertsen, I. & Vanfrauchem, I. (2013). The ritual of apology and restorative justice: exploring the victim’s perspective. In D. Cuypers, D. Janssen, J. Haers & B. Segaert (Hrsg.), Public apology between ritual and regret (S. 123-145). Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi E. V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (2009). Restorative Justice. In H.-J. Schneider (Hrsg.), Internationales Handbuch der Kriminologie, Bd 2, Besondere Probleme der Kriminologie (S. 497-506). Berlin u. a.: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (2003). Making variation a virtue: evaluating the potential and limits of restorative justice. In E. Weitekamp & H. J. Kerner (Hrsg.), Restorative justice in context: International practice and directions (S. 23-50). Portland, Oregon: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, W. J. (1998). Forgiveness and crime: the possibilities of restorative justice. In R. D. Enright & J. North (Hrsg.), Exploring forgiveness (S. 106-120). Madison: The Universtity of Winsconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dürr, T. (2009). Hannah Arendts Begriff des Verzeihens. Freiburg: Karl Alber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, R. D. (2008). Forgiveness as a choice. A step-by-step process for resolving anger and restoring hope. Washington D. C.: American Psychological association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, R. D., Rique, J. & Coyle, C. T. (2004). Enright Forgiveness Inventory (EFI). Menlo Park, Ca: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, C., Zander, J. & Hall, G. (2013). „Forgiveness is a present to yourself as well“: An intrapersonal model of forgiveness in victims of violent crime. International Journal of Victimology 19, 235-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaway, B., Hudson, J., Maxwell, G. & Morris, A. (1996). Introduction to family group conferences. In B. Galaway et al. (Hrsg.), Restorative Justice: International perspectives (S. 1-16). Monsey, NY, Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giner-Sorolla, R., Kamau, C. W. & Castano, E. (2010). Guilt and shame through recipients eyes: the moderating effects of blame. Social psychology 41, 88-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, M. & Rothmund, T. (2011). What exactly are victim-sensitive persons sensitive to? Journal of research in personality 45, 448-455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govier, T. (2002). Forgiveness and revenge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, S. (2009). Strafen als Sprechakt. Die Bedeutung der Strafe für das Opfer. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hieronymi, P. (2001). Articulating an uncompromising forgiveness. Philosophy and phenomenological research 62, 529-555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, S. (2009). Street children in Sierra Leone who forgive those who physically and sexually abuse them. A quantitative and qualitative analysis. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houser, R. E. (Hrsg.) (2009). Forgiveness. Houston, TX: National Office of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, University of Saint Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson (2001). The Japanese way of justice. Prosecuting crime in Japan. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, G. (2011). Restorative Justice: Ideas, Values, Debates, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klocke, G. (2011). Die Auflage “Entschuldigung”. Geschichte und Anwendung einer Sprechaktsanktion. aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur 6, 249-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klocke, G. (2013). Entschuldigung und Entschuldigungsannahme im Täter-Opfer-Ausgleich. Eine soziolinguistische Untersuchung zu Gesprächsstrukturen und Spracheinstellungen. München: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansky, M. R. (2001). Hidden shame, working through, and the problem of forgiveness in the tempest. Journal of the American Psychological Association 49, 1005-1033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larocco, S. (2010). A qiet assault on the malicious. In C. R. Allers & M. Smit (Hrsg.), Forgiveness in perspective (S. 3-18). Amsterdam u.a.: Editions Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leys, C., Licata, L., Bernard, P. & Marchal, C. (2012). The effects of offenders’ emotions versus behaviours on victims’ perception of their personality. Disentangling the effects of felt guilt and apologies. Swiss Journal of Psychology 71, 187-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, G. & Morris, A. (2012). The role of shame, guilt and remorse in restorative justice processes for young people. In H.-J. Kerner & E. Weitekamp (Hrsg.), Restorative Justice: Theoretical foundations (S. 267-284). Portland, Oregon: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I. & Thoresen, C. E. (1999). Forgiveness. Theory, research and practice. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • o. Autor (2014). Victim Offender Dialogue Program. Vermont. Department of corrections. Agency of human Services. http://www.doc.state.vt.us/victim-services/the-victim-services-program-of-the-vermont-department-of-corrections/vodp/vod-faq#what. Zugegriffen: 31. Juli 2014.

  • Rehbein, J. (1975). Entschuldigung und Rechtfertigungen, In D. Wunderlich (Hrsg.). Linguistische Pragmatik. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retzinger, S. & Scheff, T. (1996). Strategy for community conferences: emotions and social bonds. In B. Galaway et al. (Hrsg.), Restorative Justice: International perspectives (S. 315-336). Monsey, NY, Criminal Justice Press. Schwennen, C. (2008). Verzeihen. In A. E. Auhagen (Hrsg.), Positive Psychologie. 2. Aufl. (S. 150-165). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, J. (2007). Beyond apology? Domestic violence and critical questions for restorative justice. Criminology and criminal justice 7, 169-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbreit, M. S., Bradshaw, W. & Coates, R. B. (2003). Victims of severe violence in dialogue with the offender: key principles, practices, outcomes and implications. In E. Weitekamp & H. J. Kerner (Hrsg.), Restorative justice in context: International practice and directions (S. 123-144). Portland, Oregon: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, E. L. Jr. (2009). A just forgiveness. The art and science of forgiving. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Regensburg, Deutschland

    Gabriele Klocke

Authors
  1. Gabriele Klocke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Klocke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. IPP Abteilung 6, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany

    Nadine Ochmann

  2. Institut für Public Health, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Bremen, Germany

    Henning Schmidt-Semisch

  3. Hochschule Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

    Gaby Temme

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klocke, G. (2016). Vergebung und Restorative Justice. In: Ochmann, N., Schmidt-Semisch, H., Temme, G. (eds) Healthy Justice. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11727-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11727-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-11726-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-11727-6

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation